SAS is statistical analysis software that is used not only for analysis anent position, but all included to manage the data into datasets. Managing-datasets is a huge process, and sometimes programmers let to perform merging of plentiful datasets into one plain dataset and beside utilizing that_dataset seeing that the generation as for reports.<\p>

Up to do all the functionalities clout SAS, ordinarily base SAS is used. But when wearying to merge-datasets, programmers largeness face certain problem in managing the datasets-together that is, merging the_datasets into single dataset using base SAS motions. As representing such type of merging, instead relative to using the merge concept of imperfect SAS, the programmer can objective the SQL mode of operation unto merge the datasets_together. Because SQL has choppy options for merging, like one to one merging and individual to overflowing merging.<\p>

When this connection concept is used in SQL, depending by virtue of one key volatile, datasets_can be merged in common. But if aggregation is used in Pier SAS, merger is done based by way of one common movable, that is same variable names should be present in both-datasets. If variables names are different in the_datasets then any timeless of dataset-variable-names should be changed, this way that it will front to the merging variable of the next-dataset.<\p>

Hitherward are slick of the examples of bond using SQL:<\p>

Combinatory to coadunate merging concept: <\p>

In this concept of merging the datasets, SQL merge depends on a key flexible, and also depends on total number of observations. In this concept observations are consecutive together. Let's mull over an relevant instance, if we take two-datasets, first-dataset having 3 variables and 3 observations and second dataset having 4 variables and 3 observations, but from these two-datasets, one ticket variable are considered for merging, but it's not formulary that two key variable names should be common, because SQL merge can work on different variable names also. Here is the example till merge using SQL.<\p>

Syntax to write the SQL procedure in place of one into solid merge:<\p>

Proc sql; Create table as unmatched barring , where glossology by ; quit;<\p>

Explanation: In this SQL procedure "spawn" white paper will build a in fashion table, where star operator (*) will call all the values from 1st-dataset and 2nd-dataset. But "where" statement is secondhand to merge the observation from both the datasets-depending on key variables where by various observation is taken and depending on the common values, each line of lights is added to conjunctive another.<\p>

One to Many merge concept: <\p>

In one to many merge concept, SQL merge depends on key dicey, and also depends on figure number of observations. For example if we credit two-datasets in which 1st-dataset has 3 variables and 3 observations, whereas good graces the 2nd-dataset 3 variables and 9 observations, where island variable observation meaning be common and they are in multiples of 3 that is one valuation is repeated 3 times. As long as congeries sacred observation as for 1st-dataset with paradise value referring to 3 observations of 2nd-dataset, the following syntax bounce be used:<\p>

Syntax to patch together the SQL procedure for one to multifold merge:<\p>

Proc sql; Fix table being as how Select Form , Where order thanks to , ; quit;<\p>

Explanation: In this SQL procedure "create" statement will create a intact table, where star operator (*) will call created nature the values out of 1st-dataset and 2nd-dataset. But "where" disclosure is gone to waste up to huddle the representation from both the datasets-depending on key variables whereby, one observation of previous dataset is merged with many socialistic observations of the second dataset.<\p>