small res variant of my emote for league of legendsâ emote contest.Â
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY LANTERN!

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
small res variant of my emote for league of legendsâ emote contest.Â
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY LANTERN!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Esos lugares raros para dormir âĽď¸âĽď¸ #kitten #lalalala #memote https://www.instagram.com/p/B7o_qTWBxjI/?igshid=15ehs0y71vcgz
The History and Future of Remote Control
âYou have to know the pastâ, said Carl Sagan, âto understand the present.â We at Transmitive are building a better remote control. So, with Mr. Saganâs sage advice in mind, here is a brief history of the remote control accompanied by my color commentator Mike Meyer, in italics,
1950: Zenith debuted the âLazy Bonesâ, the worldâs first remote control, which was physically connected to the TV by a wire. Mike: does that even count as âremoteâ? When did âwirelessâ become such a popular word, anyway? And who was being more lazy, the television audiences at home, or the engineers at Zenith?
1955: The worldâs first wireless remote control, the âFlash-maticâ, used visible light and a photoelectric receiver. Visible light, unsurprisingly, was not the best technology for remote controls; other light sources confused commands, and users had to point at the receiver âvery precisely.â Mike: but it did look like a ray gun, and that was cool.
1956: Zenith debuted the âSpace Commandâ, which used ultrasound technology. The remote actually clicked when pressed, leading to the advent of the term âclicker.â This also marked the zenith (Mike: hey-o!) of remote control UI/UX. Also, look how awesome it looked! In 1956, beige, brushed tin, and cursive were all the rage. People KILLED for this remote. And the ones made out of glass and black steel? They sat on the shelves.
1970âs-1980: ultrasonic technology remained in use through the early 1980âs. The proliferation of features and content, however, pushed the industry to innovate. In 1980, a company by the name of Viewstar releases the first infrared remote control. It is an immediate commercial success. Mike: with 31 buttons, remote clutter was born, but infrared (invisible!) light was so cool that we let it slide.
1985: The first universal remote control is released by Phillips under the Magnavox brand name. Mike: itâs a great ad (remember that Sony ruled the world with the Walkman in 1985) but look at that remote! There must be fifty buttons on that thing. Awful. But notice the Eames Lounge Chair and Ottoman, and the unlabeled cigar. The advertisers could insinuate good design and refinement, but the boys at Magnavox were no Charles and Ray Eames. And, well, it was the eighties so... not exactly a high point for aesthetic sensibilities.
1987: The first programmable remote control, developed by Steve Wozniakâs company, CL 9, was released. It was extremely flexible but difficult to use, and saw little commercial success. Mike: too much Wozniak; not enough Jobs.
1990âs through today: consumer electronics companies built a variety of remote control solutions, from low-end universal remotes offered by companies like URC, to mid-range remotes from Harmony (which debuted in 2001 and was acquired by Logitech in 2004), to high-end remotes for custom installations, such as the Philips Pronto (which was shut down in late 2010.) Mike: no comment.
Remote controls will continue to evolve, especially as they are asked to tame a growing number of increasingly complex devices in the medium term. Even more importantly, though, fundamental changes in how we discover and access content will necessitate fundamental changes in remote controls. For starters, itâs almost certain that infrared remote controls will disappear over the next 10 years. TV manufacturers such as Samsung are already building WiFi-controllable TVs, though for the time being they are also IR-controllable. Most connected TV devices such as Roku or Apple TV are similarly WiFi-controllable. WiFi doesnât require line of sight, and is built into a variety of devices--your phone, tablet, PC, and TV--that can therefore be used as remotes. IR will inevitably be replaced by smarter, more flexible, and more useful technology. Although the average number of devices in the living room has grown over the past ten years, we are on track for long-term contraction as more and more content is served over the internet. Physical media (DVDs) or specific content-serving devices (set top boxes) are endangered species. The DVD player, Roku, and A/V switch currently in my living room are likely to be my last. The living room of the future wonât require more than one (connected TV) or two (surround sound) devices to access the same entertainment content that requires seven devices today. As a result of this shift, the physical remote is destined to disappear as well. Products such as Memote are jumping to take advantage of usersâ second and third screens, and to radically simplify how we interact with our home entertainment systems. In addition, by offering a technology bridge for usersâ legacy devices, they also turn existing âdumbâ devices--which will be in living rooms for years to come--into âsmartâ ones that can be controlled by a tablet, PC, or phone. How are we so certain that so-called âsoft remotesâ will become the predominant method of remote control? Simply put, because controlling the TV will soon look a lot more like browsing the internet--finding content via search--rather than flipping through a randomly-ordered set of channels. The alternative to a soft remote, of course, is to continue using a hard remote, such as the one Sony created for Google TV. But good luck with that.
Mike: holy cow thatâs bad design. Letâs just say that itâs not 1985 anymore, and Sonyâs not quite so in touch with what the people want. Sony, if youâre interested, we could help you in this area. Seriously, give us a call. If youâre interested in finding out more about what weâre up to, please let me know at [email protected] or sign up for our mailing list over at our website. Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_control http://inventors.about.com/od/rstartinventions/a/remote_control.htm http://www.electronichouse.com/slideshow/category/3891/656 http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/remotectl.htm http://www.news.com.au/technology/connected-tv/gallery-fn8tnfhb-1226079304316 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_remote http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logitech_Harmony_Remote http://hothardware.com/News/Philips-Shuts-Down-Pronto-Universal-Remote-Line/