Sep 29, 2025
looks around
Loading...
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from Nepal
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Sweden
seen from Algeria
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
looks around
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
anyway i don't usually fuck with samndean hygiene headcanons because they're usually dean-skewed (as in, usually based on dean's behaviour) then attributed onto samndean as a monolith. like normal cishetero guy behaviour aside, i don't think sam would smell bad regularly because of the lifestyle because 1) i think he cares and 2) he tends to not favour The Lifestyle in the first place lol
dstiel
hmm. 'spare bedroom'. anyway it was season eleven, not fifteen
jesus fucking christ where do i start. "what police or military team training do they have," is the third sentence of the second paragraph. "we have the boys to protect us [...] covert, cia-backed, dirty half dozen team of regular humans. [...] blue collar grit... fight very dirty." 'underdogs' vs 'overlords'—5.01, "i'm serious. i mean, screw the angels and the demons and their crap apocalypse. hell, they want to fight a war, they can find their own planet. this one's ours, and i say they get the hell off it. we take 'em all on. we kill the devil. hell, we even kill michael if we have to but we do it our own damn selves." / "and how are we supposed to do all this, genius?" / "i got no idea but what i do have is a ged and a give-'em-hell attitude, and i'll figure it out." "real heroes."
it's all the same imperialist values. if you hadn't noticed
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
this audience is so incapable of perceiving these characters beyond their shipping goggles that they can't even properly contextualise any potential valuable details that could very well tell you a lot about this character you centre your perception of the show within. like i think of dean's familiarity/privilege with henriksen as represented by dean's usage of his first name after their first proper conversation with one another as an extension of their status as foils especially so as characters with similar narrative authority. henrikson is a very 'decorated' agent, with a lot of solved cases and a lot of power over both the police and his fbi department while dean remains the narrative's idealised hunter who, in a lot of cases, represents both hunter values as well as the moral point of reference. this is further reflected in the differences in conversation sam vs dean have with hendrikson—dean and henrikson's conversation is derived from a place of shared/similar responsibility and authority for other people's lives wrt the need to 'protect them' while henrikson mostly refers to sam's responsibility as having to do with familiarity with the supernatural (lilith) sans everything else he discussed with dean. there's so much you could understand about dean's narrative position with this information referenced from a singular, small detail but i guess decontextualising it and taking that information as it is in its most shallow form is more fun
i should be paid every time someone willfully misinterprets sam's concern here by projecting the argument that dean made about the inmates lives onto the sam's actual concern—regarding the fact that they're wanted and being actively investigated by the fbi and the subsequent escape plan made by someone he and dean do not know enough to trust beyond their father—in order to morally scale dean as perceivably more politically righteous (towards the left, because there r straight male conservative fans of the show doing this same thing to dean vs sam, but while pushing dean towards the right lol) and therefore validate their interest in him as a character on the monster-of-the-week show. honestly, i should be paid every time someone adopts and regurgitates dean's projected ideal or perspective of sam as if it's sam's actual character lol
really and truly though, this is discourse that is tired to me; what i want people to ponder about their argument here are 1) what about these inmates beyond their status as humans places them within a category that deserves to be saved by dean (and sam, although i'm tagging sam in here in brackets because they don't actually see sam as For saving these people at all, even though he is) winchester over the monsters they've hunted, when it's likely that these inmates have endangered or killed just as many or more people 'innocents to be saved'/'us' as said monsters and even sam and dean? and 2) there is so much more in this episode to be critiqued than petty righteous fictional media consumption like the relationship john has with his army buddies and how dean is actively adopting and putting it to use within the way he hunts (ie. the narrative's development of particular 'hunter code') and the ways in which the show writes the police system and hunters, especially as systems that foil each other. i understand that not only is arguing this more shallow stuff more fun and easier to handle but so is demonstrating your lack of literacy abilities within your wilful misinterpretations of the scene, but i'm honestly bored and annoyed, more so the latter.
anyway 'the way sam is more right leaning that dean' i fear has no standing on the already steeply conservative motw show because we are all operating from within 'the right' (which is a vacuous phrase that means next to nothing if you don't have an ongoing conversation that contextualises it to actually mean something, which this does not) right beneath the concept of hunting and i fear sam's literal Whole Deal is being a character representative of exactly how the foundational structures and beliefs of hunting are based on fallacy and false ontologies but god forbid we even give sam the time of day beyond dean's own perspective of sam.
the phenomenon that is queers on here (spnblr) who cannot recognise supernatural as the fundamentally conservative media it is which goes hand in hand with thinking that there's a real undercurrent dstiel plot, a failure to acknowledge fundamental aspects of both sam and dean's characters, the former largely relating to attributing sam to his monstrous traits while feigning progressive views within their inability to see how the show's conservatism plays into those aspects of his character + the condemnation of those who do recognise these aspects as fundamental as having bigoted views when really the show itself is explicitly presenting this to its audience and really it should be their responsibility to break it down within context and attribute it to the way deviance is seen irl... aka another way to explain the literal and uncritical (usually unknowing/unrecognised) adoption of the righteous man vs the boy with the demon blood