#logical fallaciea

Okay, we're talking about this Anon again.

These are the verifiable, documented facts:

You responded here...to a sentence I never wrote.

You falsely claimed I called someone a "fucking kapo," then treated that claim as fact.

That line doesn't appear anywhere in my writing.

In reality:

You wrote that sentence yourself

You placed it in my mouth

You responded as if I had said or written it.

You then built an entire accusation around that invention and treated it as evidence.

What I actually wrote was:

The Jews who know you in real life and accuse you of being self-loathing, an antisemite, and/or an aspiring kapo have a strong argument… while you have no argument at all.

That's a statement about credibility. It's not a slur, and it's not name-calling.

So you either misunderstood what I wrote, or are actively, knowingly lying.

Either way...I'm sort of concerned about you, Anon.

Are you staying hydrated? Touching grass occasionally?

Your tactic is easy to recognize because it has a long history.

Fabricated speech, projected guilt, and inverted accusations are familiar territory for people who know Jewish history...which is why neither Anon grasps this. Here are just some examples.

The Dreyfus Affair: A Jewish French officer was falsely accused of treason, convicted on forged documents, and publicly degraded for years because the lie served political needs.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: Fabricated in Tsarist Russia and disseminated globally, this forged text claimed to reveal a Jewish plan for world domination. It was presented as authentic minutes from a secret meeting, despite being a plagiarized political satire with no basis in fact. The lie was sustained for over a century and used to justify state violence, discrimination, and genocide. It is still used today and is a popular seller in most of the Arab world.

Soviet Anti-Zionism Campaign: Beginning in the late 1940s and escalating in the 1960s and 70s, the USSR officially claimed that Zionism was a racist, fascist ideology. Jewish activists were accused of dual loyalty and labeled agents of Western imperialism. This campaign weaponized invented speech and ideological projection to repress Jewish culture, criminalize dissent, and isolate Soviet Jews from the global Jewish community. It is the basis of today's "antizionism is not antisemitism" lie popularized in recent years.

Talmud Trials: Rabbinic texts were quoted out of context or deliberately mistranslated by hostile readers, then used as proof of blasphemy and justification for burning thousands of Jewish books.

The Inquisition: Forced converts to Christianity were accused of secretly practicing Judaism. The evidence was invented, and the guilt was decided before the trial ever started. The crown needed some scapegoats to consolidate power and Jews are always good targets for that.

Blood Libel: Entire Jewish communities were murdered because someone told a story about a kidnapped child. The accusation was treated as truth. No proof was ever required.

Your logical fallacy, Anon, is the false attribution.

Your moral judgment depends on accurate reference to make a meaningful moral argument. Instead of an accurate reference, you assigned blame based on a sentence you supplied, not one you or anyone else received.

I will not turn out my pockets out for you, Anon, and your cheap rhetorical dishonesty demeans us both.

History is Your Friend:

Surprisingly good, given that it's Wikipedia: