#litigationfinance

Business setbacks happen—credit crunches, legal hassles, or urgent project funding needs. The best leaders act early, choosing strategic partners like Credit Curators to turn crisis into opportunity. Smart businesses today combine OTS finance, bridge loans, and alternative funding options to win where traditional banks hesitate.

What makes Credit Curators different?

One-Time Settlement (OTS) Finance: Settle NPAs, repair your credit, and restore confidence before deadlines expire. Learn more about OTS strategies

Alternative Funding: Private lenders and NBFCs fit real business needs—Explore our full range of funding solutions

Bridge & Mezzanine Loans: Urgent cash flow for receivables, inventory, and new projects—Discover project and bridge loan options

Litigation Finance: Don’t let legal battles stall your operations—See litigation funding tips

Business Restoration: Transparent advice, tailored funding, and hands-on support for your comeback. Meet our expert team

💡 Deep dive into every strategy that works for Indian founders and CFOs here: 👉 https://creditcurators.in/blog/ots-finance-alternative-funding-strategies-india

🔗 Visit our home page: https://creditcurators.in

Every problem has a pathway. Credit Curators will partner to plan, negotiate, and deliver results, so you never have to face NPA or cash crunch alone.

THE IMPACT OF THIRD-PARTY LITIGATION FUNDING ON THE DYNAMICS AND OUTCOMES OF LITIGATION

In the realm of legal battles, the cost of pursuing justice can be a substantial barrier for individuals and businesses alike. However, a revolutionary solution has emerged in recent years that's changing the landscape of litigation – Third Party Litigation Funding. Commonly referred to as litigation finance or legalpay, this innovative concept is transforming how cases are funded and providing access to justice that was once considered out of reach.

Understanding Third Party Litigation Funding

Third party litigation funding is a practice where a financially independent third party, often a specialized firm, provides funding to cover the costs associated with a legal dispute in exchange for a share of the potential settlement or award. This arrangement not only levels the playing field for individuals who may not have the financial resources to pursue a case but also allows businesses to mitigate the financial risks associated with litigation.

The Mechanics of Litigation Finance

In essence, litigation finance operates as a non-recourse investment. If the case is unsuccessful, the funding provider typically absorbs the loss, sparing the litigant from bearing the financial burden. If the case is successful, the funding provider receives an agreed-upon portion of the recovered amount. This arrangement aligns the interests of all parties involved and encourages funding providers to meticulously assess the viability of the cases they choose to invest in.

Key Advantages of Third-Party Litigation Funding

1. Access to Justice: One of the most profound benefits is the increased access to justice. Individuals and smaller entities can now assert their rights against well-funded opponents without being deterred by financial constraints.

2. Mitigated Risk: Businesses can offload the financial risks associated with litigation, protecting their assets and bottom line.

3. Expert Assessment: Litigation finance firms employ legal experts to assess the merit of cases. This stringent evaluation process ensures that only strong cases receive funding.

4. Strategic Leverage: Litigants can leverage third party litigation funding to negotiate settlements from a position of strength, knowing that they have the necessary resources to go the distance.

Navigating the Legal Landscape with Confidence

In recent years, litigation finance has gained significant traction across various jurisdictions. The involvement of specialized firms has brought professionalism and transparency to the process. One notable example is LegalPay, a leading provider of third-party litigation funding. They work closely with clients, attorneys, and businesses to provide tailored funding solutions that empower legal pursuits.

Conclusion

Third party litigation funding is ushering in a new era of access to justice and strategic litigation. With the support of litigation finance providers like LegalPay, litigants can pursue their legal rights without fearing the financial implications. As this field continues to evolve, more individuals and businesses will have the means to seek recourse through the legal system, ultimately fostering a fairer and more just society.

How Litigation Funding Can Help You Pursue Justice Without Financial Risk

Or The Dos and Don'ts of Working with a Third Party Litigation Funder

Or Litigation Funding: A Win-Win Solution for Claimants and Litigants

“Litigation finance is the new email, not knowing what it is or how it works is simply not an option.”

Litigation funding, also known as third-party funding (TPF), has become a vital tool for businesses of all sizes to manage the financial risks associated with legal disputes. Contrary to popular belief, litigation finance is not just for underdog battles but serves as a valuable resource for all parties involved in high-stakes litigation. In recent years, the global litigation finance industry has grown exponentially, offering support to both underdogs and well-backed parties in need of financial assistance.

It is significant to note that TPF stands acknowledged for civil suits under Order XXV Rule 1 of CPC. Further, the Indian judiciary has discussed TPF against the backdrop of litigation quite a few times now. Firstly, the Supreme Court’s judgment in Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji & Ors.[1], wherein it was held that a lawyer himself financing his client’s claim was illegal but there was no instituted restriction upon third parties i.e. non-lawyers funding the litigation and being compensated post-conclusion. The Ram Coomar Candoo v. Chunder Canto Mukherjee[2] ruling held that a reasonable agreement to provide funds for litigation in exchange for a share of the recovered property is not against public policy and is not illegal. However, such agreements must be carefully monitored; if they are extortionate, unconscionable, or made for illegitimate purposes, they must be invalidated. Additionally, in the Re GA Senior Advocate[3] case, the court opined that a third party litigation funding agreement in which the returns are reliant on the conclusion of the case is not prohibited per se unless the third party is also the advocate. Therefore, in effect, the bench prohibited solicitors from acting as the third party that finances the process on a contingency or success-based fee basis.

Benefits of Litigation Funding for companies and litigants in India

Ensuring Financial Stability

One of the primary benefits of litigation funding for claimants is the ability to maintain financial stability while pursuing legal action. Legal expenses can be significant, continuous, and burdensome, which can strain a business's cash flow. Litigation finance provides a mechanism for businesses to shoulder the financial burden of legal proceedings, allowing them to allocate their budget towards essential business operations instead.

By leveraging litigation funding, claimants can focus their funds on business essentials such as expansion, research and development, growth, marketing strategies, and appraisals. They no longer have to worry about diverting resources away from these critical activities to cover uncertain legal expenses, including attorney fees, court costs, and expert witness fees. Litigation finance covers all these costs, ensuring that the working capital remains accessible for significant business activities.

Non-recourse Funding

Litigation Financing offers non-recourse, which means that the funder gets paid only after a client receives the recovery. In the event of an unsuccessful outcome, the claimant is not obligated to repay the funding. This non-recourse nature of litigation finance minimizes the risk for claimants, as they are not burdened with additional financial obligations if their case does not yield the desired outcome.

Objective Analysis and Expertise

When engaging in litigation funding, the claimant has access to a fully-equipped diligence team which offers an objective analysis of portfolios for a better understanding and assessment of claims and their range with respect to “winnability”.

Additionally, litigation finance can also offer prudent counsel as may be required during litigation. Pre- and during-litigation due diligence entails thorough research, check, and review of all documents and communication records essential to the agreement made with the defaulting party. This underwriting plays a significant role in deciphering the quantum of litigation, types of claims, and what degree and kind of legal approach would suit the portfolio best.

Access to claims otherwise difficult to pursue

Additionally, claims otherwise difficult and easier to reject individually are brought to the table and given due attention. Settlements are driven by sheer merit and not by imbalanced bargaining power. LegalPay offers support to clients’ existing legal teams and to the one who requires getting in touch with legal representation.

 Strengthened Settlement Leverage

In arbitration proceedings, litigation finance can enhance a claimant's settlement leverage. By partnering with a litigation funder, claimants send a strong signal to the opposing party that their claim has merit and that they are committed to pursuing recovery. This solidifies the claimant's position during negotiations and increases the likelihood of favourable settlement offers.

Furthermore, litigation funders can assist with the timely enforcement of awards when defendants prove uncooperative. By providing financial support and resources, litigation finance enables claimants to navigate the enforcement process effectively, ensuring that they can recover what is rightfully owed to them.

Responsibilities Associated with Litigation Funding for Claimants

While litigation funding offers numerous benefits to claimants, it is essential for them to understand and fulfil certain responsibilities to maintain a cooperative and transparent relationship with the litigation funder. By adhering to these responsibilities, claimants can ensure effective collaboration and maximize the value they receive from litigation finance.

1. Commencing the Claim

The first responsibility of claimants in litigation funding is to initiate the legal claim and engage the services of a litigation funder. Claimants must provide relevant information and documentation to the funder to assess the claim's viability and determine if it aligns with their investment criteria. This includes sharing details about the legal dispute, potential damages, and any supporting evidence.

2. Communication with the Funder

Maintaining clear and open communication with the litigation funder is crucial throughout the entire legal process. Claimants should keep the funder informed about any developments, including settlement offers, negotiations, or changes in the case. Regular updates help foster transparency and allow the funder to provide appropriate guidance and support.

3. Cooperation

Claimants have a responsibility to cooperate with the litigation funder during the legal proceedings. This includes providing access to relevant documents, participating in meetings or discussions, and actively engaging in the litigation process. By actively cooperating with the funder, claimants can ensure that the funder has all the necessary information to effectively support their case. This will give the funder appropriate measure to device strategy to win the case in the favour of the claimant.

4. Deciding Funding Terms

Another responsibility of claimants is to discuss and negotiate the terms of the funding agreement with the litigation funder. This includes determining the funding amount, the funder's share of the recovery, and how the funding fee may vary over different stages of litigation. Open and honest discussions about these terms ensure that both parties have a clear understanding of their obligations and expectations.

5. Compliance with the Funding Agreement

Claimants must comply with the terms and conditions outlined in the funding agreement. This includes providing regular updates to the funder, adhering to any reporting requirements, and promptly notifying the funder of any significant developments or changes in the case. Compliance ensures that both the claimant and the funder are on the same page throughout the legal process.

In summary, litigation funding offers significant benefits for claimants, including financial stability, non-recourse financing, access to expertise, and strengthened settlement leverage. While Litigation Finance gains more credibility and recognition towards being a landmine of opportunities, India awaits its official acknowledgment as a concept that is in perfect sync with the law. While present discord has cleared the air about nothing being illegal about it, the industry tirelessly works towards a legal, certain stamp of approval that would end the ongoing debates in the best way.

For original post visit: https://legal-pay-fund-services.blogspot.com/2023/07/litigation-funding-win-win-solution-for.html

[1] (2018) 5 SCC 379.

[2] 1876 SCC Online PC 19.

Exploring Collaborative Opportunities: How Foreign Law Firms Can Enter the Indian Market Through Litigation Funders

LITIGATION FUNDING’s GROWTH IN INDIA

LITIGATION FINANCE: A NEW TOOL FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE

As per the reports by Daksh India, the average cost (other than fees of lawyers) incurred by a litigant is ₹1,039 per case per day, and the average cost incurred due to loss of pay/business is ₹1,746 per case per day. Legal expenses of listed Indian companies were Rs 36,973.75 crore in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021

Thus, litigation has been an expensive affair since the very beginning. In the past few decades, many jurisdictions have introduced the concept of third-party litigation funding to ease this burden. Third-party litigation funding companies supply the capital to litigators in exchange for a portion of the settlement or other remedies. This funding is non-recourse which means that if the lawsuit fails, the funded party is not required to pay the funder after the case. The funders provide capital to businesses and business owners to help them protect and enforce their commercial rights and interests and strengthen their legal positions. On the ‘demand side’, companies with legitimate commercial claims can increasingly access third-party litigation funding which can be thought of as a type of hedge against the uncertainty of a legal outcome.

A cheaper alternative to loans

A bank’s loan comes with a high-interest rate and also a compulsory liability to pay back even if the litigant loses the case. This is not the case with litigation finance as it is non-recourse, i.e., a return is collected only if the case is successful. Also, the business will not have the obligation to pay the principal and the interest amount and it will be protected from inflating interest rates as well. The funder can be paid from the claim amount received by the litigant.

In addition to reducing risk, using litigation finance rather than self-funding legal disputes provides accounting benefits to the business. Loans add to operating expenses and thus, reduce profits. Whereas, litigation funding removes that expense and may, in some circumstances, even be treated as revenue, immediately boosting the financial picture of the business.

Flexibility

Litigation funding is a flexible mode of financing legal expenses as it is non-recourse in nature. Litigation funding also allows lawyers, litigants, and businesses the flexibility to take up small offers on meritorious claims and enhances the probability of the dispute being resolved on the basis of the merit of the claim and not the financial position of the parties involved.

Financial benefits to the business

Litigation Funding also provides benefits like:

Hiring better lawyers that the Litigant otherwise could not have been able to afford.

Increased Liquidity- It allows businesses to retain cash for immediate business needs and release capital of the business for other priorities.

Potentially turn a company’s legal department into a revenue source instead of a fees and expenses center.

Positive P&L impact – Litigation funding keeps ongoing litigation costs off a business’s profit and loss as the expense is borne by the funder;

Claim expertise and diligence

The Funder also assesses the merit of the case and acts as a project manager, collaborating with the law firm to give an expert opinion on the case.

The diligence that the funder undertakes provides assurance of the strength of the case as a funder’s legal team undertakes thorough due diligence prior to funding to ensure the claim has merit.

With the recent pandemic affecting every walk of life, the preservation of the cash flow by businesses is critical to ensure survival. Litigation funding can help businesses to reduce risk without writing off potential upside. This option of conversion of legal liabilities into potential assets can provide businesses with the required security and certainty.