âThe course and thesis projects of the VjutemĂĄs students, which used to be spreaded in soviet and international architecture publications, had a main role in the creative exploration and in the consolidation of avant-garde soviet architecture. Among these projects, generally, the most interesting ones had the signature of students from Alexandr VesnĂn (constructivist) and NikolĂĄi Ladivski (rationalist). After conquering the VjutemĂĄs, VesnĂn and Ladovski formed teams of students for applying their teachings. In fact, there already existed a tacit competitiveness between the thesis projects presented by the students from the leaders of both avant-garde trends.
In 1925, Andrei Burov, VesnĂnâs student, was rewarded with a studying trip for his brilliant thesis for a train station. In 1926, MijaĂl Korzhev presented a magnificent design for a stadium designed in Ladovskiâs studio. Ivan Leonidov, from the studio of Vesnin, signed in 1927 a project [...]. It was 1928 and in the VjutemĂĄs the period for thesis defense had finished. Both students and teachers were ready for starting their summer vacations. However, there was a thesis presentation remaining. The defense of the project, which was rarely delayed, awakened great interest. Contradictory rumours circulated, noone exactly knew what was the topicality of Gueorgui KrĂștivovâs project. [...]
The examining board of the Faculty of Architecture of the VjutemĂĄs-VjuteĂn carried a preliminary evaluation of the drafts for the thesis projects.When the moment arrived for KrĂștikov to present the drawings [...] he was the only one not to do so as he was not prepared. The tribunal had assigned him the topicality âurbanistic planification of a cityâ, but nobody had seen any drawing. A deadline was fixed for his sketch presentation.
[...] It took place in the psychotechnical laboratory directed by Ladovski, were floor, ceilings and walls were painted in black. In the center of the room KrĂștikov disposed six tables in U shape, spreading in them diverse magazines cuttings. He positioned himself in the center while the examining board members turned around the table attending his explanations.Â
It is worth mentioning that the most interesting thesis projects in the VjutemĂĄs-VjuteĂn did not limit themselves to the profesional execution of a design for a particular object but they also worked on a creative solution for a particular problem. For this reason the theoretical corpse of the projects was often considerable and included a graphical analysis [...].
After making the jury members walk around the tables, KrĂștikov showed them some sketches in which a flying city was drawn. They were inked-drawn remnants. Having used most of his time in the analysis of the problem KrĂștikov had not achieved the required development stage for the sketch approval.
Ladovski highly marked KrĂștikov [...] Rilski, who was the Architecture Faculty dean, proposed giving KrĂștikov a ten-day period of time for presenting a finished project. [...]
After the exit of the examination board, friends and ASNOVA (Association of New Architects) colleagues entered the laboratory willing to know the presentationâs results. One of the active members of this creative association and lĂder of its more radical wing, VĂktor Balijn, declared the deadline performance was a matter that affected [...] all of the association members. In this brief reunion it was decided that KrĂștikov would address the theoretical part and the main sketches. From these and directed by him his friends would be in charge of completing the design.
The evaluation given to KrĂștikovâs drawings by the jury was widely spread in the VjuteĂn and the final defense caused certain stir. Lots of people attended the examination day. Attendees took the places effusively, sitting even in tables, sills, railsâŠâ
(Gueorgui KrĂștikov: The flying city, utopia and reality. Selim OmĂĄrovich Jan-MagomĂ©dov, 2008. Translated from Spanish version: de Miquel Cabal Guaro. Pasaje: Revuelo en los VjutemĂĄs)













