#kiritsuki

eito never had to deal with that, but he did have to deal with ableism that meant he could never be a valuable asset. he cannot be a willing soldier because he is a liability. even if he wanted to, he cannot simply fight and be done with it. he is the weakness and therefore, he physically cannot sit in blind complicity.

takumi, on the other hand, is a cishet abled white boy* who has never had to deal with the fact that being that means he has to take responsibility for the privilege he has. he has also been throughly brainwashed and had his entire childhood written in such a way that he specifically has never had to think about it.

therefore, we should stop shipping takumi with either of them, and start shipping them together. in this essay, i wi

what if you were created as a weapon of war by propaganda? what if you loved so much you failed to see what was in front of you?

what if you were on opposing sides of a war, of a love triangle, of an ideological chasm?

break the ice (+ more sketches under cut)

both have a route in which they sacrifice themself for a futuran child/ren

both have routes in which they are the protagonist and narrator

nozomi and eito are fighting for the same reason at the end of 2nd scenario

they look like karua

the doorbell ringers. genuinely 90% of the time it’s either nozomi or eito

what if you were hurt by the people who were supposed to protect you and it left a wound that will never heal and you see someone else who went through what you did and they did exactly the opposite of what you did

(you could never have done something like that. hurting her just because of her work? no, no, that wouldn’t have been fair to her. it was just because of her job. she loved you. she loved you, you know she loved you, even though it hurt. even though it hurt. it’s your fault she did what she did. if you had just been better, if you had just been a better subject, she wouldn’t have died.)