One thing I donāt really see talked about in reference to The Diplomatās Son is how Felipe and Jose Garzonasā deaths directly mirror each other, and yet we are led to draw completely different conclusions about Bruce and Jason from their deaths:
Felipeās death obviously comes first, and whilst itās left up in the air whether or not Jason intended for him to go over the balcony, Jason definitely caused it, and the entirety of #425 serves the meta purpose of solidifying the narrative of the consequences of Jasonās āactionsā.
However, what isnāt discussed as often is Joseās death. Of course, this is far less ambiguous as Bruce would never kill on purpose, but ultimately, Jose is killed by a car which falls on his after Bruce climbs up the scrap heap. Even if this wasnāt the intended outcome, like with Jasonās āspooking himā, it was Bruceās actions as Batman which led to Joseās death, and yet the narrative does not feel the need to follow up on this in the same way that it does with Jason and Felipe - thus, Bruce is effectively, and perhaps hypocritically, deemed blameless.
Anyway, I just think that how the narrative treat each of the Garzonas menās deaths is really interesting. Itās obvious that Joseās death was an accident so the narrative exonerates Bruce immediately, but even the suspicion of guilt is enough to fully doom Jason.
It ultimately doesnāt matter that Jason said he didnāt mean to cause the death, as the issueās very existence (as a continuation of the Diplomatās Son plot) is enough to find Jason guilty. If the narrative didnāt want us to find him guilty, the story would have been allowed to move on without following up on the aftermath (as it does when Bruce is indirectly responsible for a death, like Joseās). By choosing to linger on this, the writers highlight Jasonās involvement in the Garzonas case as significant enough for comment, in a way that Bruceās involvement in the death of Jose Garzonas isnāt. Thus, regardless of whether Jason did it, the narrative finds him guilty of Felipeās death (and perhaps even all of the subsequent deaths in the junkyard), in a way that it would never for Bruce. And I just think that the contrast in the treatment of Bruce and Jason in the wake of the Garzonasesā deaths (especially since the plot revolves around their diplomatic immunity, aka real life plot armour) is really telling of the treatment of Jasonās character at the end of his OG Robin run, and how formative this is for Jasonās revival in the 2000s.
This is not necessarily saying that Bruce believes Jason did it - honestly, in the narrative itās not wholly relevant, as Bruce is more concerned about Jasonās mental health than anything - however, the entire meta purpose of the arc is the writers telling us that Jason is capable of great violence when pushed.
