Sergey Georgievich Dzhura
Dear Reader, It is the work for the Man of the Future and it deals with the Ethic Algorithms of the Future Science. It is a ready Doctoral dissertation which I have not managed to defend so far as there are no relevant boards to do it at. The necessary academic councils are to be established. The book is the specific public defense of the dissertation. It is a collection of papers in which the author shows the application of the research new synthetic method. The method has not been recognized by the modern science yet, though its roots go in the old days. Different aspects of its application in pedagogic, philosophy, power engineering and artificial intelligence are examined.
All the papers were presented at various international interdisciplinary conferences in different world countries, were awarded by diplomas and got positive references from experts. They are presented in the logical order in the book. There are some repetitions but they just emphasize the significance of application of the ethic algorithms in science.
The book came out in the year of the 700th anniversary of St. Sergius of Radonezh, the 350th anniversary of the Treaty of Pereyaslav, 140th anniversary of N.K. Roerich, 135th anniversary of E.I. Roerich, and the 110th anniversary of S.N. Roerich.
The Universe Ethic Algorithms. The book is to be read by the heart language.
There is every reason to consider the work to be one more brick of the building of the Science of the Coming Jerusalem.
The Universe Ethic Algorithms
The Universe Ethic Algorithms
A researcher does not have a purpose to get an instant result. He works for the future, as a sower does. His responsibility is to lay the foundation for those who will come and show them the way.
N. Tesla
A science is to deal withwhat ―can not be‖, and that ―can be‖ is not ascience, it is a technology.
P.L. Kapitsa
Chapter 1 Philosophical understanding of algorithms and methods of decision making
The Universe Ethic Algorithms
V.V. Otkidach, S.G. Dzhura, V.I. Chursinov
1.1. Heading to forming of the planetary civil society
The identity of purposes and conclusions, and therefore that of the further way of the mentioned paradigm rapprochement is demonstrated in the paper on the examples of two outlook conceptions (introduction to the modern science and esoteric). The answers to the questions put forward by one outlook have been developed by the other one. Thus the academician N.N.Moiseyev‘s maxim ―to find a new moral system for the modern mankind‖ was properly developed in the other outlook conception (Theosophy, Agni-Yoga), which not only contradicts but also supplement with and even outstrips the things that have been discovered by the traditional science today.
The authors give examples of two outlook conceptions (introduction to the modern scientific /1/ and esoteric /2/) to show the identity of goals and conclusions and, therefore, further rapprochement of these two paradigms. The answers to the questions put forward by one outlook have beendeveloped by the other one. Thus the author‘s /2/ maxim ―to find the new moral system for the modern mankind‖ is perfectly developed in the otheroutlook conception (Theosophy, Agni-Yoga) which doesn‘t contradict everything discovered by the traditional science. More than that, it supplements it and goes much further.
Introduction to the problem’s topicality. We fully agree with the words of the academician N. N. Moiseyev according to which ―the possibilities of the consuming society – the civilization originating from the neolitical revolution- are spent or are close to be spent. All good the society had been able to give people was already got, and now the mankind is on its way to the epoch of qualitative change of the character of its development. If to use the dynamic system theory language the mankind is on the way to the bifurcation phase where the public evolution process channel , that is the public evolution development type ( and maybe theanthropogenesis character) itself is changed‖ /1/.
The academician N. N. Moiseyev is sure that it is necessary tointroduce as special course ―The Modern Outlook‖ as the relationshipsbetween a human being and the Nature are globally critical at present. The authors of the paper share this opinion. Just for comparison they also turnedto the book ―The Basics of the New Epoch Outlook‖ /2/ devoted to thefundamental life problems and the mankind development Though N. N. Moiseyev considers the esoteric knowledge to be ―ancient, not completely lost or simply intuitive knowledge or even superstition‖, he calls it esoteric(and explains: from Greek: ―inner‖), that is secret, hidden, assigned toesoteric people only (in religious ceremonies, mystical doctrine, magicformulae)). The knowledge came from the human being‘s history andexists now, in the era of space and nuclear energy. More than that, according to the authors, the knowledge is of great demand now. According to the academician N. N. Moiseyev the relationship between a human being and the Nature occupies a special place in the knowledge. He emphasizes the beneficial influence of the Nature itself on a human being /1/. Theauthors of the collected articles /3/ ( by the way, it‘s the collection of the articles of Russian and Ukrainian scientists supporting both the traditional science approach to the outlook problem and the esoteric conception stated by the Doctor of Philosophy S. R. Ableyev who was the first to defend the dissertation on the Roerich family heritage. He also wrote a striking book which is closely connected with the topic of the paper under discussion /4/ as the author managed to overcome the philosophy eurocentrizm and illustrates thoroughly both oriental and Russian conception, cultural and historical phenomenon of the esoteric philosophy. All science conferences―The Ethics and Future Science‖ traditionally organized and held by the New Epoch journal Delphis are devoted to rapprochement of the outlooks of the science and esoteric conceptions.
From «ноmo sapiens» to «homo noospheres». At the beginning of the XX century V. I. Vernadsky said that the practical activity of a human being is the main geology forming force of the planet. Now, in the era of the nuclear energy, we know that the human being is able to destroy everything that is alive on the planet. That is why understanding of thepotential possibilities of the human being‘s activities and danger as to the human being‘s fate being the result of the activities if they are not controlled by the Collective Intellect of the human being is tone of the corner stones of the world outlook and, consequently, the education system /1/.
V. I. Verndadsky‘s philosophy (Russian Cosmism) is as follows: the more destroying are the forces the mankind possesses the more perfect the mechanism of social control over these forces should be. It is impossible to make this control perfect if there is no philosophical platform which can appear in the frames of the noosphere theory. To create this theory is the first and foremost task of the science of the XXI century /5/.
The primacy of the material comforts is the dead-end way oftechnical civilization. The noosphere‘s ideals mean the primacy of thecultural wealth over the material comforts, personality freedom from, first of all, the economic pressure and unfair social system.
The human being should have, like V. I. Vernadsky did, limited material and unlimited cultural needs. The wise ideas of grand V. I. Vernadsky are very topical today: ―You can‘t put off taking care ofeverlasting and grand for the time when the possibility to meet the elementary needs will be reached by everybody. Otherwise it‘ll be too late. We‘ll hand in the material comforts to the people whose ideal will be―bread and spectacle‖. They would only like to eat, drink, make love anddo nothing. Can the teacher be satisfied bringing up the Skalozubs, Molchanovs, greedy for money bankers, corrupted free-livers, gluttons, and selfish people /6/?
The term «homo noospheres» was introduced by a group of authors /7/. The academician A. A. Yashin says: ― The modern Russian scientist,philosopher and cosmos supporter V. P. Kaznacheyev, a recognizedsuccessor of V. I. Verndadsky‘s doctrine on noosphere puts ahead the problem of vectorization of the movement of the summarized intellect of the Earth planet : the intellect implemented into the culture, culturalaspiration, science and technical progress etc.‖
The vector of the movement of the summarized intellect of themankind at the moment of change from the «ноmo sapiens» to «homo noospheres» should be analyzed /8/. According to the authors of the paperthe virtual reality (in literature, mass media, and the Internet) is this summarized expression, the reflection of the collective intellect. It‘s aseparate big topic for discussion. This very component is of greatimportance as ̳the future of the planetary community will greatly dependon the knowledge spreading and character, erudition, culture and ideological universals which are the knowledge consequence and which N. N. Moiseyev calls the world understanding. ―It is this very component of the outlook that society can influence purposely. The future of the society will depend on its ability to understand and accept the unavoidable taboos, and obey them, but it will not depend on the technique and technologyperfection‖ /1/.
The necessity of ecological imperative closely connected with the ethical one.
The system of prohibitions which guarantees the mankind‘sdevelopment stability is implied by this term. Why is it so? Whilebecoming «ноmo sapiens» that is being aware of himself like this the human being was able to survive due to the right of the ̳wise‘ which existed along with the right of the ̳strong‘. According to N. N. Moiseyev it was reflected in the first ―taboos‖: ―Don‘t kill!‖ ―Look for your second half next cave‖ and later on in the system of the ―Teacher‖. It made it possibleto create the stronger army and people and to survive. Thus the dispositionsperfection ( the idea of ̳morality‖ and later on the ―ethics‖ –morality science- generated from it) helped the human being to survive rather than to kill each other as it happened at the earlier stages ( archeological dig proves it).
The Universe Ethic Algorithms
The principle ―don‘t kill!‖ solved the contradictions between thestrongest and wisest in favour of the latter.
When N. N. Moiseyev spells the word ―Teacher‖ with the capitalletter he means not a person who teaches other people but the whole system of passing the information to further generations. This system is formed by public institutions. A teacher as a separate person whose occupation is to teach young generation is the most important element of the system of the―Teacher‖. This element is based on traditions, legal institutions whichprovide the bringing up of the future members of the society. Defence of all members of the tribe or family contradicted the relations which traditionally existed in the primitive herd. Really, wise and skilled members of the tribe who provided its welfare were not always the strongest, most courageous and luckiest in the men‘s fightings which werepreferable under usual species selection. To defend not only females and posterity but also knowledge and skills bearer or those who could bear them were of vital necessity for the herd of the original people ( or primitive horde). According to N. N. Moiseyev the strongest prohibition―don‘t kill!‖ appeared gradually on this basis. As it was extremely important for any human being‘s group it became the background for anymoral and exists in different forms in the religions of all nations /1/. Wewould like to state that the concept of the ―Teacher‖ was developed themost completely by the oriental tradidition /2/.
The danger of coming back of the New Medieval appearedimmediately. ―I often call myself a pessimistic optimist as I see thepotential possibilites the mankind has. But I‘m not sure at all that themankind will be able to use them and manage the genetic heritage left by the mammoth hunters which lives in us. Once this heritage threw all the achievement of the antique civilization back, immersed Europe intodarkness of the Medieval. It‘s this heritage that represents itself both in theworld and local wars and every day behaviour of the inmhabitants of the civilized world /1/. As a matter of fact it is necessary to change the thinkingparadigm as we are at the very point of bifurcation from which we can‘treturn.
The statement made by S. V. Klyuchnikov is quite suitable here. ― Itis more important to catch and understand themoral of the forthcoming epoch by separating the main from the secondary. If theindividualism – the characteristic absolutely necessary to find the place under the sun - has been constantly cultivated in the human being since Rennaisance , the new synthesis epoch gives birth to a new quality which is commonness. Itmakes the human being feel himself "―a single whole'‘/10/. A number of
more The Universe Ethic Algorithms:
