âThis film isnât about fucking, itâs about human rightsâ, says the Iranian-American youth in Maryam Kesharvazâ Circumstance, which opened in the UK on Friday. Surprisingly, despite winning the Sundance Film Festival's audience award last year, it doesn't seem overly to have impressed any audiences over here.  Reviews in the national press have called it âcrude and predictableâ and essentially making excessive use of the âtrowelâ as a laying-on utensil where the teaspoon would do. Perhaps the most attention-worthy criticism, however, would be that of Leila Mouri, Iranian womenâs rights activist and writer for the Huffington Post, who calls the film âa very trivial portrayal of Iranian youthsâ sexual desires,â as opposed to the revolutionary portrayal of sexual minorities that it could be. The opening comment on human rights and fucking does not, I should add, reference Circumstance itself. The speaker is attempting to persuade his Iranian friends to help him dub Gus Van Santâs âMilkâ into Farsi, and to understand the seriousness of his agenda. Mouriâs contention is with the latent message that the Iranian teenagers in the film need an American to stir their political conscience. As it appears in the 107mins on offer, the only right they particularly care about is the right to fuck. I wonder, though, whether the same would be said of a film that dealt specifically with the right to freedom of speech or freedom in education. In a film which tells the tale of two female lovers in a country where âmorality policeâ form a menacing presence and homosexuality is a hang-able offence, the right to sexual freedom seems a pretty important one, no? Circumstance doesnât undermine other political travesties, it just doesnât have space to deal with them all. Itâs like saying Milk didnât pay enough attention to the civil rights of Californiaâs dairy farmers.
I will not pretend that the filmâs various episodes of sexual fantasy werenât sometimes lurid and a teeny bit cringe-inducing. The porno-style music and lingering closeups on one particularly full-lipped characters mouth might justify the trowel comments, but the excess and sexual freedom (however jarring) of these scenes are precisely what the film seeks to champion as common rights. The protagonists are teenagers, seeking rebellion in underground parties fueled by booze and drugs. They havenât had time to prune their sexual fantasies to nice respectable and tasteful ones. The desires of the filmâs two lovers are real and devastating, and as relevant to the cause of Iranâs sexual minorities as those of any fully-fledged adult. Following release, both Circumstance and its director are now banned substances in Iran. In London, the film is currently showing only in the Institute for Contemporary Arts â hardly apt for an âaudience awardâ winner. Superficial flaws aside, the film is deeply affecting. As I see it, this makes the disappointment of critics, and the indifference of distributors, a real shame.