Common Misconceptions: Removing Impaled Objects
Uh oh. Character C is in the wilderness with Character D and they just got stabbed by a murderer / impaled by a tree branch / walked over barbed wire / fell on a pointy thing. What should D do? Leave the impaled object in? Or take it out?
Luckily, the author has read a lot of medical advice posts online and knows that you always leave impaled objects in. Right?
Nope. As a wilderness first responder, we are actually empowered to remove impaled objects in most cases (assuming we are two hours away from care).
Leaving an impaled object in lets it do more damage. C is halfway down the Grand Canyon. One of those infamous Grand Canyon serial killers has just stabbed him. How does D intend to wrap the knife in place so that hiking out does not jostle it around and stab C more?
The answer is D cannot. The same is true of sticks and other implements—unlike in the front country, C and D need to travel at least two hours before care and that changes the rules.
A second excellent reason to remove an impaled object is if the object is so large, C cannot travel with it. In the wilderness, D might not have the ability to saw through a log so C and his impaled object can hike out together. Should D just leave C there? No! It's time to remove that impaled object.
A third excellent reason to remove an impaled object is when it is impeding a basic life support function. For instance, if C needed CPR and the barbed wire he'd impaled himself on was thwarting D's access, that barbed wire is gone. (Remember: when raising the dead, essentially nothing in contraindicated).
When NOT to Remove Impaled Objects
Eye liquid is difficult to replace. Losing it can mean losing the eye, so even though it sucks, D should leave the impaled object in C's eye while they hike out. D should splint the object in place using a cup or similar object and get out ASAP. Depending on terrain, D might also cover the uninjured eye. This is to keep C from moving his eyes.
Put the cup upside down over the impaled object and wrap it in place.
The patient yells "stop stop stop!"
My WFR instructor liked to say "never say never, never say always," but one rule that is about as close to an always as you can get in the wilderness is: if the patient is screaming and begging for you to stop, you should stop.
Therefore, if D tries to pull out the impaled stick and C starts shrieking in pain, it is now time to leave that object in place.
Removing the object will cause more harm
If C was, for instance, impaled by a barbed harpoon, or shot with an arrowhead, it might behoove D to leave it in place during evacuation.
The same is true if it looks like removing the object will lead to blood loss, as blood loss should be avoided, in the wilderness and outside of it.
The impalement is in the core
The core is home to two of the three most important organs in the body, (and, unfortunately, to the spleen). It has also plenty of big arteries and other important things that should not be damaged. If evacuation is possible without removing the object, the object should stay in place.
The internet lied to you when it told you removing an impaled object was literally the worst thing in the entire world. Frontcountry, leave impalements in. Backcountry, we almost always remove extremity impalements.