Let’s talk about house loyalty
Mainly, I wanted to talk about Gryffindor’s strong moral code. I love love love this about the series because people sorted into different houses are going to be loyal to different things, sometimes just as loyal as Hufflepuffs are to their friends. I thought we’d start with Hufflepuff because that’s the easy one, Hufflepuffs are great friends because they value friendships and promises over everything else. That’s like half of the reason they were sorted. Hufflepuff can sometimes seem like a ragtag bunch (nowhere does it actually say Hufflepuffs are nice, remember Zacharias Smith?) but their loyalty to their house, each other, and their hard work ethic pulls them ahead and makes them a strong house even if they don’t necessarily have a common goal.
Now, perhaps the least loyal to their house is Ravenclaw. A lot of the time people compare Ravenclaws to Slytherins because they’re both so individualistic, but Ravenclaws ultimately will sacrifice themselves if it means there is a better world resulting in it. This is where the distinction between Gryffindor and Ravenclaws come in, they have a very different definition of a better world, and to Ravenclaws that always means more or new knowledge. Ravenclaws don’t actively seek to become martyrs however, to a Ravenclaw they probably don’t want to die because that means all their knowledge is gone so there is some self-preservation which is why people sometimes compare them to Slytherins.
Now, I love Slytherins because they have this weird dynamic where they are sometimes the most loyal, but only if it benefits themselves. Like in the Pottermore letter, Slytherins are a brotherhood, which means everyone has the same loyalties: self first, then house. However, because everyone is aware of this weird arrangement, it can make them even more powerful and self aware as a house. For Slytherins to be successful, they need first to be strategic, placing each individual in a position where they can succeed the most because to Slytherins every competition is really an individual sport and if you do well, nothing else matters.
Okay, the whole reason I made this post-GRYFFINDORS! I love writing Gryffindors, because they have such a solid moral code or set of rules that dictates everything they do in life. To Harry, defending his friends and keeping people safe was the overall objective (anyone else call a Pukwudgie?) but to Neville he had a very different idea of what was ‘right’ and stood up to his friends to protect what he believed in. And this is where Gryffindors differ from Slytherins. I don’t think Gryffindors realise as fully that they all are living by different moral codes, because to them the glory of being ‘right’ is so bright that they sometimes don’t realise that they all define that differently. Maybe this is why there is so much bickering done by Gryffindors, but writing or living one feels like a formula, every choice dictated subconsciously by what is ‘right’ and when there moral code changes that means something huge has affected them because that is super rare.
Anyway, I hope you enjoyed these theories about house loyalty. As usual, I could be wrong; what do you think?










