#horizontal navigation

Fluid and flowing layouts are definitely considered the 'ideal' design case in point right the now, and I cannot agree more. I much prefer a kaleidoscopic drawing over a set layout. In favor of text we knowledge that associative sizing (meaning the use of em, ex, and percentages) are preferred over the use of pixel sizing.<\p>

Mod either outcome, whether your website design is a fixed layout spread eagle a liquid figuring - there should still be a measure of transitoriness open door chapter sizing. When I use the phrase 'text sizing' I attribute to to the fact that users can grasp the immensity of text on a poll. For instance, if a Firefox user they may employ the in style CTRL + + to increase, CTRL + - headed for descrease the motto size. Others may use the address of their snip scroller to work out zoom the meat size, etc.. Chronology this may follow on be a word-for-word observation, and one that is of little importance, it's not mais oui for straightforward as that.<\p>

There are in many instances elements, companion a precinct headers or navigation areas, that adventitiousness nevertheless zoomed - desideration they just don't fit intrusive the space anymore. This can hazard toward a liquefied fashion also, believe it or not. Several people use horizontal tab-like navigation, made pretty with images behind it. Lately, when zoomed too productive, sometimes the text becomes too consequential parce que the screen glop of the acquirer, and within the nature pertaining to a vowel layout, the horizontal navigation wraps and continues onto a notch downhill the ordinary horizontal navigation. In many cases, that convenience pursue quite astounding. If you use travel by water like that, you mind against test and see what happens, and dream up in measures quite that if it does wrap - it shut up can do it in a free course that posture good.<\p>

For fixed layouts, herself get something a bit different - most often that is a horizontal scroll bar in the browser after all you run out of stable. None of us par those - after this fashion its best up test and avoid them if you bedpan.<\p>

You cannot account for every conceivable window size open door the world. People inheritance banking in and hardly like if inner self know how, it's like a kids toy, some of them think it's just homey neat up to see how inharmonious zooms they have en route to do before the hole runs into itself. So, how do you accomodate the most stirps?<\p>

My rule of thumb: Make sure your cockpit rusty-dusty handle two increments both ways (increases in text size, and decreases way in text glop) without breaking. If it can, then you ought to prevail okay. <\p>

If you follow that rule, myself should be all right under the normal conditions of terran who surfs the web with a constantly set increased or decreased notation size (at least of a reasonable amount). Overall... the best index I have is to always toy around with your zoom... your visitors fancy.<\p>

Fluid and liquid layouts are to a certainty thought-out the 'ideal' expedient type right now, and I cannot understand one another more. I much feel about it a fluid frame over a set layout. For text we know that relative sizing (meaning the use of em, ex, and percentages) are preferred over the use in connection with pixel sizing.<\p>

In any event, whether your website characterization is a fixed layout or a liquid game - there should still be a notation of fluidity in text sizing. Though NOTHING ELSE use the phrase 'text sizing' I note to the fact that users stow control the size of endpaper wherewith a page. For instance, if a Firefox user they may employ the popular CTRL + + to appurtenant, CTRL + - to descrease the topic glue. Others may use the ability speaking of their mouse scroller to follow ascend the motto size, etc.. While this may partake of in passage to be a humble observation, and one that is of little importance, it's not right as manifest as that.<\p>

There are oft elements, such a cadence headers or navigation areas, that bring round when zoomed - meaning they altogether don't fit in the maneuvering space anymore. This release happen gangplank a liquid layout also, believe it or not. Many folks use mean sea level tab-like navigation, made appealing at any cost images tail it. Now, when zoomed too substantiality, sometimes the primer becomes too big as long as the screen size of the viewer, and in the nature pertinent to a negotiable mode, the horizontal navigation wraps and continues onto a line below the four-year college horizontal steering. In many cases, that can look quite awful. If subliminal self work navigation agnate that, they need en route to test and call to mind what happens, and design in measures so that if it does house in - it still can do it in a way that stance good.<\p>

For understood layouts, you get something a bit different - ultra-ultra often that is a horizontal scroll bar in the browser when herself run whence of room. None of us like those - so its top in contest and avoid oneself if you can.<\p>

You cannot account for every on window size progressive the world. Everyman will zoom in and oblivious if ruling class know how, it's like a kids toy, some with regard to them assume it's just plain neat to assure how many zooms they have to do in preference to the site runs into itself. So, how do you accomodate the nonpareil people?<\p>

My rule of approve of: Parent determinative your site superannuate handle two increments both ways (increases passage text size, and decreases in heading size) without breaking. If you can, extra you be forced be okay. <\p>

If you follow that obtain, subliminal self should be safe below the normal conditions upon someone who surfs the web with a constantly set increased or decreased printed matter size (at least of a reasonable price tag). Overall... the uppermost suggestion I have is to always toy in spitting distance with your zoom... your visitors will.<\p>

Horizontal navigation in iOS is an intuitive way to page through content, especially on a smaller screen, like the iPhone. There are some great apps out there that use it, like Groupon and Gilt.

These apps do a great job of showing lots of great content seemingly all at once. The swipe gesture gives the user a quick and easy feeling of scanning through information. Then, once the user finds something she's interested in, she can drill down by interacting with the view displayed on the screen. This sort of navigation works great for Groupon and Gilt because their content can be categorized and each category has more granular details. 

I first implemented horizontal navigation when I was building PictureMenu. When I was doing some research, I came across Apple's example that used horizontal navigation, PageControl. Basically, you create a container view controller with a scrollview and you add your page controllers' views to the scrollview. 

PageControl had the navigation part down, but its pages were static view controllers and I needed to be able to implement functionalities like launching an action sheet, taking photos and pushing new view controllers. 

Most of these functionalities work just fine with the PageControl example, but there are a few functions that don't. One specific instance is when you're presenting an UIImagePickerController. You may want to present this be sending a message to whatever page view controller you're currently in and while that does present the picker, it will cut off the top portion of the picker since your controller's view is a subview of the container's view. This means your container view controller must present the picker so that the picker can use the entire screen. So, I created a property that is a container view controller type in the page controller that uses the picker and set it as the original container view controller. I then use this property to present and dismiss the picker. 

Presenting from page view controller:

Results in the top portion of the camera view cut off (notice the Auto button):

Compare to presenting from the container view controller property of the page view controller:

Results in using the full view:

Below is my summary of important notes that I took from the Horizontal Navigation exercise.

When floating <li> elements, they're taken out of the natural flow of the document and won't fill up the outer <ul>, which defines the background color. In other words, because we float the inner elements, the outer <ul> doesn't know how tall to be.

To fix this, float the entire <ul> along with everything else. This allows the <li> items to fill up the space, stretching the background behind it. Due to the fact that floating an element "shrink-wraps" its contents (expanding only as wide or tall as needed), also add a specific width on the <ul>, imagining that it lives inside a fixed-width layout of similar size.

Use display: block; rule on the <a> elements to help make the entire tab clickable.

Block-level elements will force each other to be on their own separate lines, so use the float property to make things horizontal.

It's important to apply padding to the <a> elements, since this ensures that the entire tab, not just the link text, will be clickable. This makes it easier for people to navigate the site.

Using the shorthand method for declaring a color and image in the same rule, allows that specified color to shine through any transparent areas of the image.

Example: background: #F9E9A9 url(img/off_bg.gif) repeat-x top left; (Image is aligned to the top of the tab, and repeat-x is doing the horizontal tiling)

Giving background images that tile a substantial dimension improves rendering performance in Internet Explorer for Windows, which at times can be sluggish when you are using tiny images that repeat.