On me giving myself feelings for Elendil and MĂriel even though they have a total of zero interactions on page
I'm looking at how insistent Elendil is in the UT that we should not count VanimeldĂ«'s husband Herucalmo in the line of kings of NĂșmenor. Elendil clearly specifies that Herucalmo WAS of royal blood, as a descendent of Atanamir, and that he effectively ruled NĂșmenor for 20 years, until he died, and he even adopted a royal name -- Tar-Anducal. But he also makes a point of highlighting that none of the circumstances of his claim made it legitimate, and goes on to say that Alcarin, Herucalmo and VanimeldĂ«'s son, "ruled for 80 years until his death in 2737, being rightful King for one hundred years".
The difference between Herucalmo and PharazĂŽn is that PharazĂŽn is still married to MĂriel and thus he is a legitimate king. Which brings to mind again Elendil's insistence that the marriage was not just a product of coercion, but that it was illegal anyway because cousins that close can't marry under NĂșmenorian law. I've mentioned before that it sounds so weird on page the first time you read it, that a lame ass law about cousin marriage would be put on the same level as rape/forced marriage... and I always come away with the same impression, that it is easy to assume Elendil is just using every single argument he has to say that PharazĂŽn's kingship is at best dubious...
Also thinking, of course, of FĂriel and Averdui and this post by @anghraine...




