so um hdm is gonna break mah heart next year because THAT EPSIODE YES THAT ONE THAT AIRED A FEW HOURS AGO that's the last time lee sees lyra and um im sorry? but??? im literally crying rn???
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
*nails my piece of paper to Philip Pullmanâs front door*
So, I made a joke earlier today about writing up my grievances with the world-building of the His Dark Materials trilogy. I genuinely didnât think anyone would be interested enough to ask me about this. But someone did, so Iâve abandoned the actual jobs I needed to do today and went away to cobble together this post to summarise My Thoughts (and no-one was more surprised than I to find that there were more than two).
Let me say that these are my thoughts and opinions on this particular canon of work. I donât judge anyone who likes them (hell, I love the idea of daemons and I certainly think there are some interesting concepts explored in the series) and you are more than welcome to disagree with me on any (or all) of the points that I outline below. And youâre certainly allowed to acknowledge that there are issues with a text and still find enjoyment from them. Iâm not looking to Cancel anyone â I just have questions and Iâm prepared to shout them into the void.
If anyone does reblog this, I ask that you donât tag it with #hisdarkmaterials or #hdm, because thatâs unfair on the people who are using those tags to curate a positive fandom experience.
Caveat to all of this â I havenât read the books, but I have watched the current BBC/HBO series in great depth. Iâm also writing a fanfic called The Shadow Mandate set in the world of His Dark Materials and that has required me to do extensive research and engage with multiple sources about the world. Itâs as a direct result of this research that much of these questions and critiques have arisen. I am planning to read the books soon though (mainly so I can roast them more thoroughly)
Donât send this to Philip Pullman (or Philman, as I will probably refer to him from here on out). 1 â he isnât going to care what I say (heâll just say itâs a metaphor and to not read too much into it or something equally as infuriating) and 2 â I donât care what he says.
Now all that boring stuff is done, letâs get to it. Iâm putting this all under the cut so the poor folk who want nothing to do with this can ignore at their leisure.
This will possibly get a bit tongue in cheek in places â just a warning
One Church to Rule Them All, One Faith to Bind Them
So, one of my main questions about the world of His Dark Materials is the Magisterium and the Holy Church. And that question is âHow?â
Overlooking the fact that this was probably a conscious decision by Philman to Make A Point, I still have questions behind this behemoth of an institution. Based on my research, Iâm of the understanding that Lyraâs world parted from our own when John Calvin became the Pope, and transferred the seat of Papal power to Geneva. After Calvinâs death, the Magisterium was formed and they consolidated power from there.
In my mind, this just doesnât work. Because it makes it sound like Calvin was the only person standing between the Catholic Church and the Protestant Reformation. Whilst he had a big role in the Reformation, he just wasnât the only person working for reforms (I mean â Luther? Hello? He had 95 problems, and Indulgences were all of them). You could probably argue with me on this, as he was a significant figurehead of the Reformation, but there were so many people working for change in Europe at the time that I would have thought that someone else would have taken that place (you can read more here).
The lack of denominations also doesnât really sit with me because if thereâs one thing I know about Christians, itâs that we love to argue over teeny-tiny details and build whole new ways of worshipping around them. The fact that the Magisterium doesnât just tear itself apart is, to be honest, quite surprising. And, you know, the Eastern Orthodox tradition was already a thing at the time⌠(hereâs a brief overview of the East-West Schism of 1054)
Iâd also like to point out that Papal power was dominant in Western civilization. That leaves a lot of the world for the Magisterium to then suddenly gain power of. Or did Philman conveniently forget that Judaism (although the Jewish people had suffered significant persecution in Europe by this time), Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism (and many others) were all already very well-established religions in other parts of the world that I doubt would have taken too kindly to the Magisteriumâs political advances. This idea of a religion having such a heavy-handed control over the whole world just seems a bit too far-fetched for me to believe.
However, I have to acknowledge that I say this as a white, Western Christian â perhaps people genuinely feel that is the case.
I do know that the witches are mentioned at having their own religion, but I canât really find any information about it, so I canât really compare them. It could well be that other religions and faith practices are mentioned in the books themselves, but Iâm struggling to find them (do the shamans count? Iâm not sure). Perhaps this is just me, but one religion consuming the whole world (or, at least, the vast majority of it) doesnât strike me as particularly plausible.
 Beast from the East
This is probably my most serious critique of the series, and one thatâs actually been the most nightmarish for me to deal with in my own expanded world-building of Lyraâs world for The Shadow Mandate. This is an issue that has been discussed at length Marek Oziewicz in the paper âRepresentations of Eastern Europe in Philip Pullmanâs His Dark Materials, Jonathan Stroudâs The Bartimaeus Trilogy, and J. K. Rowlingâs Harry Potter Seriesâ â which I highly recommend you read!
(And it dunks on Ms R*wling too â what a treat!).
Iâll do a little summary for those of you who havenât got the time to read a whole paper:
The His Dark Materials trilogy is told from a very British point of view (understandable, the author is a white British man)
Britain is a positive and exciting place, where all the characters are individuals with the capacity for good or evil
The general geographical sense of the world-building is that the further East you go (in Europe) that the less ties the people have to the Holy Church and the more barbaric they are â see the Tartars and their âBreathless Oneâ practices
The Eastern European races are frequently described with qualities such as âcruelty, pitilessness, barbarism, fierceness, physical and emotional instabilityâ (Oziewicz, p. 8)
A lot of nationalist stereotypes surround the peoples of these races/countries
I mean, the treatment of the Tartars (which is a living, breathing ethnolinguistic group) as a whole is pretty disturbing. Theyâre described to be like a âwarmongering race of xenophobic genocidal humans who want to conquer the whole of the Earthâ (Quote) - compare that to the complexity of the characters from the West. Oziewicz notes that the Tartars are somewhat akin to the Imperial Guard of Star Wars, as their helmets have âno eyes â or at least you couldnât see any eyes behind the snow slitsâ (Northern Lights, p. 289). As far as I can tell, theyâre pretty much just tarred with one brush â made particularly plain by the fact that all Tartars seem to have identical wolf/husky daemons â unless that was a requirement when the Magisterium put the job posting on Indeed.
So, a whole nation of people has been reduced to a single archetype â one that plays on existing prejudices in British culture. That just feels like extremely lazy world-building to me â I donât know a single country or ethnic population that could accurately be described as one archetype.
I also feel that a lot of other countries in the world are written off with sweeping generalisations â or just kinda lumped together? So, a lot of my research has involved me looking at the canonical list of Globetrotter Maps, and a whole bunch of countries tend to get lumped together â particularly, Iâve noticed, the South American countries. It does this really intriguing and complex world a major disservice. As I said, this is something that Iâve had to grapple with for my own work â and I hope that Iâve done enough work so as to begin to dissemble what Philman started.
 A new and exciting way to get around the âGâ slur
For those of you who are unaware (although, youâre on Tumblr â how could you possibly not be aware?) the G-slur is considered to be a pejorative description of the Romani ethnic group, associated with idleness and itinerancy. It comes from the mistaken European belief that the Romani people came from Egypt (they arenât). You can read more about that here and here.
Philman decided to name his ethnic group known for travelling and trading as they go âGyptiansâ. I wonât insult your intelligence by explaining any further.
Should I let this slide with the explanation that the term is so pervasive in Britain that itâs actually a legal term? Perhaps, but Iâm not going to.
 Kill Bill God
My only issue with this is that if Philman wants to kill God, he should kill⌠God. Not some angel with a superiority complex. But seeing how badly some people took it, I can understand why he didnât. I still think heâs a coward.
 Sex, Dust and Dragons
I have a whole other bone to pick with Philman about his obsession with sex in childrenâs literature, but thatâs not what youâre here to talk about. No, you came to hear about His Dark Materials.
Itâs established in the world that Dust doesnât settle on children because they donât have experience â they are too innocent. Based on the research Iâve done, and the language used in both the film and the mini-series is this maturation from childhood to adulthood is though protosexual experiences e.g. kissing. And this is what Mary Maloneâs role as âthe serpentâ is â sheâs the one that make Lyra think about her sexuality for the first time:
As Mary said that, Lyra felt something strange happen to her body. She found a stirring at the roots of her hair: she found herself breathing faster. She had never been on a roller-coaster, or anything like one, but if she had, she would have recognised the sensations in her breast: they were exciting and frightening at the same time, and she had not the slightest idea why. The sensation continued, and deepened, and changed, as more parts of her body found themselves affected too. She felt as if she had been handed the key to a great house she hadn't known was there, a house that was somehow inside her, and as she turned the key, deep in the darkness of the building she felt other doors opening too, and lights coming on. She sat trembling, hugging her knees, hardly daring to breathe, as Mary went on...
Marzipan, The Amber Spyglass
(Thatâs such a long quote)
Itâs then made explicitly clear that itâs the intimacy of Lyra and Willâs relationship, and the touching of one anotherâs daemons, that causes Pan and Kirjava to settle in their true forms.
Andrew Lloyd Webber was right â love really does change everything.
Hereâs where things get a little bit petty.
So, if Dust begins to settle on children once theyâve had their first âsexual awakeningâ â what about those people who donât ever experience that? Because, believe it or not, asexual people have existed for a very long time. If they donât experience this, then would their daemons settle? What are the implications of this? Are asexual people remaining in the âchildlike innocence of the Garden of Edenâ? (Quote)
Asexual fans of His Dark Materials, I pass this question to you â do you lack a soul because youâve never experienced sexual desire? Is sex truly instrumental on the road to maturation? Iâd love to hear your thoughts, and what youâd do if your daemon never settled. Would you let them shift into a dragon? I know I would if I were in that position.
This issue, to me, is massively indicative of the prevalent attitudes towards the asexual community. There is a tendency for media products to portray a-spec people as immature because they donât experience sexual attraction â which is just not true. The ace community has said many times that they feel that this attitude infantilizes their orientation, and itâs a view that needs to be challenged. Check out this source for more information on the microagressions faced by this community â section six is particularly relevant. Asexuals are mature â despite this lack of âexperienceâ that Philman seems to think all people need to have in order to become free-thinkers. This just isnât true. I donât understand why society seems to believe this theory, but with its prevalence in media itâs not too difficult to see why this view pervades.
Anyway, the only reason Iâm so petty about this particular aspect is that Iâm so bored of reading stories where sex and romance are the most important thing. I think heresy is a much more interesting sin than sex, so thatâs what The Shadow Mandate will be about once Iâve finished it.
I also have some more minor world-building issues both in HDM and the later Book of the Dust trilogy including, but not limited to:
Why is it New Denmark? The Dutch were quite famous for reaching America â New Amsterdam being the original name for New York. Admittedly Iâm only cross about this because I got mixed up in my own world-building.
Thereâs even more âotheringâ of non-British races â particularly the Skraelings who are analogous to the Inuit people (but possibly a term for all Native-American peoples) who carry out âbarbaricâ practices such as trepanning
Witches canât forgive men that turn them down. Well I donât have much of a problem with this as such, but it just makes me think of that quote about fairies from Peter Pan â âFairies have to be one thing or the other, because being so small they unfortunately have room for one feeling only at a time.â
The treatment of Pantalaimon by Lyra in subsequent adventures
Malcolm Polstead needs to leave Lyra tf alone
 I appreciate that this is a very long and whingy list about things that I donât like, so congrats on making it this far! Iâd love to give you something â perhaps your time back â but alas, my powers only extend so far. I appreciate that the His Dark Materials books are well-loved and that most people would probably disagree with what Iâve said â I just have lots of questions and Philman doesnât have as many answers as I would like. But then again, should I really read this much into the work of a writer who seems willing and capable to ignore the personality of their protagonist for a whole book? I donât know. But I do know, that axolotl daemons would require a lot of work.
(I have beef with Philman â thank you for humouring me)