hangingeagles replied to your post:if the us constitution guarantees the separation...
because ew gay people are icky, duh //sarcasm
ahahaha don't you love the argument that people try to make that gay people are more likely to spread stds
renkinjutsush1Ā replied to yourĀ post:Ā if the us constitution guarantees the separation...
Itās not only people of religion who disagree with homosexuality; if you were raised an atheist you could be just as homophobic. Also, itās sort of a problem because you canāt just disqualify hundreds of thousands of the nationās votes based on views
true, but i feel like the people who oppose gay marriage on a non-religion-based opinion are easier to sway. i'm not sure of whatever reason they might have for opposing gay marriage but i still feel like they'd be more ok if gay marriage were to be nationally legalised than people with religion-based opposition would be
anyway what do you mean by "nation's votes"? people aren't exactly "voting" for gay marriage- it's more of an addition to the campaigns of government officials, if at all, since people's stances on this topic is largely guided by personal beliefs.
godcardĀ replied to yourĀ post:if the us constitution guarantees the separation...
its explicitly unconstitutional for the federal govt to regulate marriage i think
is it? (i was shit at civics haha if it really was explicitly said in one of the amendments, then i completely missed it) i know it's more of a state's right to regulate marriage b/c they distribute marriage licenses but i don't think it's unconstitutional on the federal level. the supreme court determined a lot of gay marriage decisions that states had huge disputes over, and the supreme court on the federal level.










