seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from China
seen from India
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Kazakhstan
Ibn al-Haytham goecentric model: Bridging Ancient and Modern Astronomy
Table of Contents Key PointsBackgroundHis View on the Geocentric ModelCriticisms and ContextSurvey Note: Detailed Analysis of Ibn al-Haytham’s Geocentric ModelHistorical Context and Ibn al-Haytham’s BackgroundAcceptance of the Geocentric ModelCriticisms of Ptolemy and RefinementsInfluence and LegacyComparative Analysis and Unexpected DetailsTabular Summary of Key Works and ViewsConclusionKey…
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
You Can't Disprove The Geocentric Model.
You Can Only Exclude It On Philosophical Ground.
🧿 A global model claim is baseless under non-critical analysis of one's own individualistic thought. Shrouded ignorance under the guise of an expert fallacy turned authoritarian. Formulations created like calculus confuse the layman of understanding observations over equations forced to make sense by changing its formula depending on, for example likened to gravity. Issac Newton himself does not ascribe to the formulations of innate gravity to which he created and quoted it is of great absurdity that any competent faculty of thinking can fall for that dogma. Science is relatively an indoctrinated narrative formed by formulations too incomprehensible even by definitive numbers sake.
Please ascribe to the idea of a Geocentric model, that to which ancient Astronomers based evidential research on. Any scientific claims past the 1850s should be observed carefully and not without critical thought. 🧿
The Fellowship Of Disillusionment -- Philip Yancey's "Disappointment With God"
The Fellowship Of Disillusionment — Philip Yancey’s “Disappointment With God”
I never write book reviews … until now. Now I am making an exception for three reasons: (1) Philip Yancey’s book Disappointment with Godis an unflinching appraisal of how long-term disappointment precipitates crises of faith in the life of religiously devout people, (2) the theodical implications of that process, and (3) the theological consequences of (1) and (2). If you have been reading…
View On WordPress
Mu'ayyad al-Din al-'Urdi
Mu’ayyad al-Din al-’Urdi (died 1266) was an Muslim astronomer, mathematician, architect and engineer working at the Maragheh observatory. He was born in Aleppo,todays Syria, and later moved to Maragheh, Azarbaijan, to work at the Maragha observatory under the guidance of Nasir al-Din Tusi.[1]He is known for being the first of the Maragha astronomers to develop a non-Ptolemaic model of planetary motion.[2] In particular, the Urdi lemma he developed was later used in the geocentric model of Ibn al-Shatir in the 14th century and in the heliocentric Copernican model of Nicolaus Copernicus in the 16th century. As an architect and engineer, he was responsible for constructing the water supply installations of Damascus, Syria, in his time
The Urdi Lemma
"Urdi's lemma" was an extension of Apollonius' theorem that allowed an equant in an astronomic model to be replaced with an equivalent epicycle that moved around a deferent centered at half the distance to the equant point. Anythony Grafton's demonstration of Maestlin's proof to Kepler may help to visualize. You can also drag the al-Shatir and al-Tusi sliders to zero in Dennis Duke's animation to see al-'Urdi's equant-less model for Mars in operation.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
When astrology was a real thing
#science #astronomy #astrology #Kepler #Brahe #Heliocentrism #Geocentrism #History
Hi, it is important to distinquish the difference between astrology and astronomy. The most basic is that nowadays astrology is no longer science field.
Today I want to talk about astrology when it was mainstream. For this to be true we have to move back few years, I want talk about renessaince, so that is about 400 years.
These days astronomy has gained a great improvement since old times. This…
View On WordPress
Nagai Kakzumasa (永井 一正)
Bartolomeu Velho,1568. Geocentric model
