[W7: Body, Brand, Betrayal â Your Body Is Expired, Please Update!]
We Are SlaveâOops, I Mean Made of Fakeness
(Itâs Not Just SurgeryâItâs a Show, and Weâre All Cast in It)
We donât just modify our bodies anymoreâwe modify our entire image. Filters sculpt our faces before surgeons do. Aesthetic templates tell us whatâs âhot,â and what's not. If we don't adapt? We risk being erased. In an era where looking good is survival, body modification isnât a choiceâitâs an expectation.
1. The Illusion of Choice: Are We Changing for Ourselves or for the Algorithm?
_Plastic Surgery? How about Image Surgery?
Before we go further, letâs get one thing straight: body modification isnât just about surgery.
Everything gets an updateâincluding what it even means to modify ourselves.
Itâs not just the knife. Itâs filters, contour, gym grinds, fashion overalls, camera angles. Heck, even a swipe of mascara and call it a day counts. Opting out? Not an option.
But hereâs the kicker: Body modification isnât the villainâpressure is. Beauty trends move faster than iPhone updates, and if you canât keep up? Youâre out.
One moment, razor-sharp cheekbones reign supreme. The next? âSoft girlâ beauty takes overâbut only if the softness is sculpted just right.
And letâs be real, the no-makeup makeup look doesnât mean actually bare-faced. Your skin better be flawlessânaturally or, ahem, with a little help. (No hate to my fellow plastic surgery besties - itâs your body, your choice! You're cool.)
So, who decides these trends? Because it sure as hell isnât the people draining their bank accounts trying to keep up.
_JoJo, Have You Learned NOTHING? Youâre Too Old! Also, Grow Up!
Remember that whole thing about stereotypes back in Week 4? (If youâve read it, youâll know what I mean! Just wanna make suređ)Â
Yeah, well, plot twist: Itâs not just about genders and sexuality anymore, because the new girl has arrived: The âacceptableâ way to be an adult.Â
And no one felt that pressure harder than JoJo Siwa.Â
She didnât go under the knife (I think?), but letâs be realâshe had to remodel herself to fit the part. If body modification is about survival, then this is its final form: Image modification.
Now donât get me wrong, what she did is a mess, but letâs be real; she was handed a checklist:Â
đThe bows? Juvenile.Â
âšThe sparkles? Cringe.Â
đSmudge the eyeliner.Â
đDitch the high pitch
đŠ”đżRip the fishnets.Â
đŠAct provocatively.Â
đ»Chug booze on stage
âïžFlaunt tattoos like war medals. (theyâre fake btw).Â
đ¶Talk about little kiddies.
đAnd, of course, sprinkle in some NSFW content.
(not that she had time to figure it out before the world forced her handâbut hey, give the girl a break, sheâs trying)Â
_Insert Coin to Continue: The Cost of Being âSeenâ
Just like that, Jojo wasnât a kid anymoreâshe was reprogrammed. And of course, the internet had opinions (as always).Â
âThatâs what adulthood is supposed to look like, right?â
-little JoJo thinks.
But did JoJo actually choose this transformation? Or was it a survival tactic?
And mate, I call this - âthe trapâ.
Body modification isnât just about lips and hips anymoreâitâs about shaping an entire image to fit a mold. And when the mold shifts, so must we.
JoJo didnât just changeâshe had NO choice. The world would never let her stay the same. And fame? Fame doesnât reward authenticityâit rewards adaptability.Â
New image or full-blown surgery? Doesnât matter. JoJo only gets one real choice: Adapt or die.
2. I Canât Believe Itâs Not Me! A Guide to Looking âRealâ (By coughing the money up)
_When Your Existence Needs a Glow-Up
Weâre told self-love is the answerâbut if you feel ugly?
Every flaw is your personal project to fix. No pressure, though! Just a quick filler here, a gym membership there, a thousand-dollar serumâboom! Youâre âempoweredâ now.Â
You CHOSE this yourself, right?
Yay! You âescapedâ the male gazeâŠ
...Only to be enslaved by capitalism.
Flawlessness has never been more expensive, yet weâre still expected to achieve it effortlessly. Self-love didnât free usâit just gave us new ways to hate ourselves.Â
(Somehow, we still gotta look hot while falling apart.)
And social media? It thrives on this cycle. Algorithms donât just reflect beauty standardsâthey enforce them. The more engagement a body type gets, the more the system amplifies it. Platforms donât just show us whatâs trending; they make sure it stays trendingâuntil itâs time to sell us the next look.
Carah and Dobson (2016) explain that algorithms track which body types get the most engagement and push them even further, making beauty a numbers game where visibility equals value.
If you canât do that? The algorithm swipes left.Â
_Congrats! Youâre a Trend Now. Hope You Age Well
So, weâve dragged modern "body modification"âa.k.a. "Image Surgery"âthrough the mud. But what about the OG version?
You know, the real knives-and-needles kind? The one that doesnât just tweak your Instagram aesthetic but permanently reshapes you?
Once upon a time, the BBL was the must-have body upgrade. And guess who led the charge? The queen of body trends herself - Kim Kardashian.
She didnât follow the trendâshe was the trend. Hyper-curvy became the gold standard of desirability. But the moment slim and ânaturalâ came back? She deflated faster than Wall Street in â29.
Kim didnât just sell a body typeâshe sold an entire industry. And when she cashed out, the beauty economy followed.
As Dorfman et al. (2017) point out, Instagram isnât just flexing glow-ups; itâs fueling a billion-dollar plastic surgery pipeline, turning young adults into prime targets.
âȘïžKim can afford to hit âundo.âÂ
đThe rest of us? Weâre stuck with yesterdayâs trend on bodies that todayâs beauty standard has already abandoned.
Today itâs BBLs, tomorrow itâs something elseâbut the system never changes.
Drenten, Gurrieri and Tyler (2019) make it clearâvisibility is currency, and if you canât cash in, youâre out. The algorithm doesnât do nostalgia.
3. The Ultimate Scam: It Was Never About Bodies, Itâs About CONTROL
_Body Modification: The New Cage of Beauty â If You Donât Change, Youâll Disappear
Body modification isnât just about aestheticsâitâs about proving something.Â
Prove youâre sexy, but not too sexy.
Be strong, but still desirable.
Improve yourself, but in an acceptable way.
Itâs not about personal choice anymore; itâs about survival of the most âbeautifulâ. Change your body, or risk becoming invisible.Â
đȘâStrong women donât care what people think.âÂ
(Yes, we do. Thatâs why we get work done or youâll just shame us into silence again.)
đ
âReal women donât chase validation.âÂ
(Unless itâs repackaged as empowermentâthen go off, queen.)
đâConfidence is power.âÂ
(But not too much confidence. Stay humble, darling.)
So here we are, stuck between two impossible choices:
Modify yourself? Youâre a brainwashed sellout.
Stay the same? Youâre insecure and outdated.
SHOCKER: Weâre Not Modifying OurselvesâWeâre Being Modified
At this point, body modification isnât just about looks. Itâs about staying relevant.
Kim modified her body.
JoJo modified her personality.
We donât just edit our faces or tweak our figures anymore. We modify our entire identitiesâpiece by pieceâuntil we fit whatever the world expects of us.Â
Our bodies are now brands.
Our confidence? A product we have to buy.
And if we refuse to play the game?
We get erased. From relevance. From desirability. From opportunity.
So, tell meâwho really benefits from all this?
Because if weâre all constantly reshaping ourselves to fit the next trendâŠ
Whoâs really in control?
Your body is expired, please update?
Maybe itâs time we stop letting the system install the updates for us...
Atske, S 2021, âThe State of Online Harassmentâ, Pew Research Center, viewed 21 March 2025, .
Haslop, C, OâRourke, F & Southern, R 2021, â#NoSnowflakes: The toleration of harassment and an emergent gender-related digital divide, in a UK student online cultureâ, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1418â1438.
Marwick, AE & Caplan, R 2018, âDrinking male tears: language, the manosphere, and networked harassmentâ, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543â559, viewed .