Dec 4, 2022
Loading...
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from South Korea
seen from Spain
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Media have tremendous power in shaping political and cultural narratives—telling us what and who matters, why things are as they are and wha
An actually useful media literacy guide
The lack of analysis of US involvement in Lava Jato is especially surprising because Greenwald has long been a critic of US foreign policy.
I think there is still room for debate about the intentions behind US involvement in Lava Jato—a Brazilian “anti-corruption” investigation that, as Greenwald shows, pursued aims consistent with the history of US policy towards Latin America that Securing Democracy outlines. However, I see no justification for the complete omission of US involvement in a book that is largely about the politics of Lava Jato, and that draws on the sources from which we know much of what we do about the US role. Whatever Greenwald’s position is here, it deserves clarification, and the failure to examine the US role in Lava Jato is a significant flaw in an important book.
Articles that chided media for being credulous toward Gazan authorities themselves failed to critically examine the claims they relied on.
Of course, a government that is the main supplier of weaponry to another government accused of committing a war crime is not an objective analyst; the US exoneration of Israel (which was also a self-exoneration) should not have been treated as particularly compelling evidence, let alone a definitive judgment.
3 November 2023
The New York Times says that UN Ambassador-nominee Samantha Power "criticized the American invasion of Iraq because it lacked the council's
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
How to Ignore 4.5 Million Deaths
A review of Norman Solomon’s War Made Invisible By Bryce Greene/ Fair.org/ August 1, 2023 Brown University’s Costs of War project released a study this year estimating that US-led wars since 9/11 have contributed directly and indirectly to 4.5 million deaths in the targeted countries. Those countries—Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Libya, Somalia and Syria—have also seen an estimated 40–60…
View On WordPress
So why did news outlets think voters needed to hear about Trump about three times as often as they heard about Sanders?
October 1, 2015
All the cable news channels talked about Trump more often than Sanders—even MSNBC, which often caters to a progressive audience. MSNBC did come closest to parity of any outlet we looked at, however, with 69 percent as many Sanders as Trump stories.
The facts on Iran's nuclear power program should be clear by now--but as coverage by the New York Times and MSNBC demonstrates, evidently th
June 13, 2013
One from the arrives on RM specifically