#electron speed

The Trouble With Physics.

11 Nov., 2016

I don't, often, have the opportunity to talk physics with anyone.  When I do, it can often be with people who seem intent upon proving to me how much they have read, not how much they think.  Anyhow, yesterday I had an opportunity to talk about my Electrons being the measure that sets the speed of light, with a young man with some physics education and who seemed quite interested in theoretical thought.

I think he got the concept... it's pretty easy if you understand physics and have understanding of frequency, wave lengths, and energy concepts vs motion... relativity, as it were.  Everything is relative, which is what makes observing anything, with accuracy, difficult, sometimes.  Anyhow, I realized, when we talked about the size difference between quarks and electrons, that there is a lot of confusion out there about that kind of thing.

To clear it up... in conventional physics, nobody gives a crap... they are considered point sources and any issues with size, or relativity, or time... Plank can take care of it, somewhere in the math... i.e. Max Plank, who gave us a kind of ruler, of measure, of what is zero and how we might measure things from there, by means of wave length.  Wave length, by definition, takes care of the time issue... unless you live in a reality where the speed of light is not the same as here, on Earth.

One must assume that the speed of light is pretty constant, in open space.

Keep in mind, it bends towards stars.  Whether by gravity, or curved space... take your pick, it's pretty much going to happen... light bends.  Remember that when thinking about expanding universes... the farther the light, the exponentially farther it has to travel, the farther out it is, because of all tha bending, and bending, and bending, and bending, and bending... I think you might get my drift.

But, it is important, when I start talking about electrons having shape, and that there are smaller particles, actual physical particles, smaller than the electron, I'm not talking about Quarks.  It takes, at least, three quarks to make a proton, or neutron, and there, yet, heavier quarks than UP/DOWN Quarks.  Mass is important, and our best shot is the electron volt mass times the speed of light squared.  It gives some measure of size and, if you check the numbers, electrons are the smaller of all quarks, by that measure.

My concern, in the world of physics, is that nobody pays much attention to electrons because they are so much a part of our life we don't think of them as unusual... electricity/magnetism is anti gravity, as it were, and we haven't noticed, yet.  This ignoring, of electrons, has many thinking of quarks as being the smallest 'particles' in existence.  It's important to remember that these quarks have lives so short, they barely exist, as themselves before being absorbed back into atoms, or converted to another form of energy as they dissipate back into the background of electronic noise that surrounds us.  But... I alluded to 'The Trouble With Physics" and that trouble is this....

In both particle and quantum physics, the electron and the quark are both considered as point sources, singularities as it were... but they occupy space.  Giving them Plank values helps, but it avoids the issue of size and shape, most particularly shape,  That is, in my opinion, a serious issue and we must come to assume that there are physical particles the size of gamma rays... of that wave length, and that they have shape and volume in space... they are HERE and THERE 'at the same time' for themselves... unto themselves they are a singularity, but not vs the background.

Is there a zero space?  There must, logically, be a point, at which, there is no space, at all.  The trouble with physics is the failure to reconize that there are physical particles smaller than electrons, together with a solid definition of time... what time actually is. Measuring time vs the speed of light, which might vary, will cause variable errors in all mathematics involving the speed of light... i.e. variable outputs relative to some unknown constant value.  We can never find where X marks the spot, as it were.  Did you get that?

When God said "Let there be light", in Genesis, remember, there was only water, everywhere.  What was light?  Did God invent light?  Remember, light is just a  narrow band of frequencies about one micron wide... conveniently the same length as your nerve cells, and nerves in your eyes... to resonate with those frequencies.

Maybe God just turned on a flashlight.  He had yet to come up with the idea of a sky, or the sun, or moon, or night and day.  Very weird, don't you think?  I'm an atheist, by the way.  I think religion is superstitious nonsense.  I have a traditional, orthodox Jewish approach to life... there is no heaven, nor hell... when you're dead, you're dead, as in forever.  As a physicist, I am aware that time is a kind of illusion of physical size, so it's hard to say, exactly, what time really is, anyway.  Have a nice day.

The Shape of an Electron

Nice warm sunny day in Vancouver, today.  Was out to see my specialist.  My red blood cell count is high, so I have to reduce the amount of testosterone I’m taking.  My body is not making it so I have to get injections every twelve days.  Called Hormone Replacement Therapy, it’s working great for me.

Here is my http://ElectronSpeed.Tumblr.com blog entry for today...

14 September, 2016.

If you are new to this blog, you will want to start at the beginning and work your way to here.  I am attempting to show you that the Speed Of Light is set, to us humans who rely on an electrical brain, by the actual physical size of the electron... more specifically, the half spin distance... half of the diameter of the electron.  Increasing voltage will, electronically, make electrons spin faster, and physically, move MORE electrons, at the SAME time... amperage, as it were.

To PHYSICALLY move an electron requires VECTOR forces... physical vs physical.  It is important to remember that electrons are both waves and particles AT THE SAME TIME.  In this blog, you will have to start thinking as all things having a shape... that shape is universal at all levels of size and reality.  Electrons must have a shape, and must be composed of even SMALLER bits, of something.  What that is, is likely related to Dark Matter... might actually BE dark matter as a standing wave.

So... what has been on my mind, the past few days, is the SHAPE of electrons.  It was thinking about their shape that got me onto the idea that they were the cause of the speed of light... that electron size was the measure around which we measure time.  But, what is it's shape.  I had been going with a Dodecahedron, for the longest time.  It has really nice faces for making connections to other particles, while being extremely stable, as a shape.  Hard to break that sucker to pieces.  Mathematically, one must consider the Octahedron... two four sides pyramids back to each.  That would provide nice poles upon which to spin, and resistance to spin with such blunt surfaces, while being as small as one can get, be symmetrical, and use the least number of parts.  Only a Tetrahedron will be smaller, but it lacks two cute little poles, diametrically opposed to each other.  Tetrahedrons are not good building blocks, contrary to what one might imagine.  They don't stack neatly together to make larger structures very well... almost not at all.  The ancient Greeks screwed up on that idea... when they were looking at basic shapes.  Spheres, likewise, while they can have spin poles, don't stack up without leaving a lot of in between spaces.... and if you get small enough, that left over space is very tetrahedron shaped... with slightly curvy sides.

Not being a spherical shape, also provides an answer to physical resistance when electrons move through a conductor... why is there resistance?  The thing is, one also wants the electron to have as many surfaces as possible while remaining extremely stable, and the smallest shape, like that, that might mathematically exist.  Another shape... one that might be a better candidate for electron shape, is to give it 60 surfaces.  Doing that makes it available to divisions of 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12.  Mathematically, it's a very lovely shape... and it covers a complete whole scale, musically, and 6 octaves.  It has many more possibilities than a 20 surface particle.

What are the parts?  I have no idea, but suggest they are particles... YES, particles, of dark matter.  We must start to assume that the universe is FRACTAL in nature and simply continues to get smaller and smaller.  Nothingness may be a kind of illusion of perception of both time and space.  If you were extremely small... say, the size of an electron, than a centimeter is a very LARGE distance that would take time to travel, physically... electronically, if the electrons don't have to actually move... just spin and vibrate, then ENERGY can travel AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT... one electron at a time, to it's destination.

If you increase the voltage you will attempt to move MORE electrons, using DIRECT CURRENT, or you will get them to spin, in resonance, with the PHASE of the source current.  It turns out, using lower voltages and LARGER conductors works well for direct current.  If you use alternating current and increase the frequencies to 100,000 cycles, or more, you can quite easily transmit energy, electronically, through the air, or a vacuum... we call them radio waves.  However, if you wish to move large numbers of electrons, a good way is a high voltage, alternating current with large wires... high voltage transmission lines, as it were.  There seem to be optimum voltages and frequencies for doing that... the most efficient combinations.  That seems to depend upon both distance, size of wire, temperatures, etc.

I'll leave you with this... I'm beginning to think the electron is most likely a 60 surface spheroid which might, I suggest, be composed of a  number of other stable shapes based upon a 5 part 'particle''of Dark Matter.  In any case, the electron seems to be a unique kind of expression of matter, and the vehicle which can move both physically, and be used to TRANSMIT energy.   It can BE energy and transmit it.  That's pretty cool.  We are an electron dependent reality.  The much larger structures we know as Protons and Neutrons might even be constructed of thousands of electrons.  Electrons are the smallest particle we can detect because we use electrons to detect things... but, lately, we have found ways to show the shadows of smaller 'particles' we call X rays and Gamma Rays.  We need to start thinking of those things as being both waves AND particles.  While particles, at high velocity, they are dangerous to us.  They can sever DNA connections if strong and directed.

ARE WE THERE YET?

http://ElectronSpeed.Tumblr.com

ANTENNAE

A signal is nothing more than energy on the move.  To be an effective signal, the energy but flow like a stream, or in packets.  If it flows like a stream, we call it analogue information… smooth and continuous, or if in a packet, we call it digital… off and on signals.

Either way, signals are useless unless there is a detection system.  For we humans, our detection systems lie in our skin, eyes, ears and nose.  But, what are the actual detectors.  In the case of a human, the detector is a body cell, sometime associated with a hair… the thing is, every signal needs an antenna to receive it.

Antennae work best when “in tune” with the signal.  What that means is the antenna should be the same wave length as the signal… have the same TIME signature… i.e. the antenna should be the length it would take, IN TIME, to travel from one end of the antenna, to the other, in one complete wave.  Or… another way, is to be exactly the same wave length, or so very close, IN SIZE/WAVELENGTH that it will begin to VIBRATE with the incoming signal… this is called RESONANCE.

The antennae of the body are located in the nerve cells of the skin, the tongue, the ear, and the eyes.  You may be surprised to find they are approximately one micron in diameter… that is the wave length/frequency spectrum of light and heat… exactly the CORRECT size to detect THOSE SIGNALS… heat and light.  Some people can see a slightly wider range of colours and feel a slightly wider range of things.  Wave lengths SHORTER than light can cause damage to the skin (Ultra Violet) rays.  And even shorter waves can cause damage if strong enough, and close enough, such as radio, X Ray, and Gamma Rays.  They have the ability to destroy nerve connections and cells, themselves, which are made up of SMALLER parts called atoms and molecules.  A molecule is an assembly of atoms that like being together on a permanent basis… water is an example.  It consists of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen molecule that can not be torn apart except electrically… using an electric current.

The skin needs only a large one micron dish to soak up infra red rays.  It also soaks up all the other smaller rays… so watch out for sunburn.

The ears use a combination of surfaces and hairs attached to nerve cells to detect sound.  Sound is NOT electronic… it belongs to PHYSICAL WAVES.  Physical waves are prone to energy absorpbtion from waves both longer and shorter than its size… it does NOT depend upon resonance of the hair.  The hair/nerve combination translates the physical energy into electrical energy with is sent BY ELECTRONS to the brain.  Pain is not understood, at all… why we feel pain.  We know it is the result of being exposed to wave lengths in the heat range of the electromagnetic spectrum, but PAIN occurs in the BRAIN.  Colour, likewise, is interpreted in the brain.

Colour is a break down of the visible spectrum.  Colour is individual frequencies… discreet frequencies associated with each colour.  We like to say there are three primary colours… RED, GREEN, and BLUE, but there are a zillion hues and shades ‘in between’.  Interestingly, there are three SECONDARY colours that also can be used to compose a full spectrum of the colour rainbow… these colours are cyan, magenta, and yellow.  We use both systems of colour assembly… computer screens and projection systems with light use red, green, and blue, while printed systems… relying on REFLECTED light, use magenta, cyan, and yellow.  Look carefully, with a magnifier, at the dot colours in a magazine and you will clearly see magenta, cyan, yellow, and black.  The black is added to accentuate dark and shadows.

What happens in the human eye?  We have TWO kinds of receptors… RODS and CONES.  Now that is weird, isn’t it?  Why bother with two when one antenna is usually good enough for signals… not quite.  If you were born in the 40’s and 50’s you will remember TV antennae on roof tops.  They would have a variety of different length pipes aimed in parallel rows, horizontally.  As regards the TV antenna, they are aimed horizontally because the signal is somewhat directional, and they want the rods of the antenna to be lined up at exactly 90 degrees to the source signal for best reception.  The TV signal is exactly a ratio of the length of the poles/pipes on the antenna… but shorter in a ratio of ½, or ¼, or 1/8th.  Notice radio waves like being divided by 2, 4, or 8.  This is to help them RESONATE with the signal and generate an electrical signal in the pipe/tube which is then amplified to produce the TV picture or radio sound.  TV uses two circuits… an AM (amplitude modulated) circuit for the picture, and a separate radio FM (frequency modulated) circuit for the sound.

Your eyes need dual antennae too.  Why?  It’s mostly for efficiency.  Rod cells are good at detecting LEVELS of light across the ENTIRE spectrum of light.  They do not distinguish between colours, and can be MORE sensitive to light by being the exact wave lenght long as the entire visible light spectrum… about 600 nanometers.

The other detectors, in your eyes, are the cones.  The cones, likewise, are about the length of the light spectrum… one micron maximum, but they are CONE SHAPED.  Why?  It has to do with the detection system for different colours.   The cone shape makes the entire cell tuneable… the narrow top part of the cone is more sensitive to very short frequencies and will begin to vibrate/resonate before the LOWER part does… sending a signal to the nerve saying it is receiving very short (blue) light waves.  If it is getting more of one frequency than another, it will send a combined signal.  This is very much like a radio antenna which is as long as the longest waves, but the tuner can pick out shorter waves with filters.  A filter, in a radio, is a coil, a kind of transformer. Coils, as Tesla figured out, can alter the frequency of a wave.  It can also alter the voltage, at the same time.  One must be careful not to confuse voltagte with frequency, but they are closely related.  You don’t need high voltage to get a high frequency, but you need voltage to make that signal go anywhere… have strength.

Your eyes can not send information to your brain any faster than electrons can move, or spin.  While it is not necessary for the electrons to move (direct current), the BA, the background energy, MUST traverse every electron, one electron at a time.  It can move as fast as the voltage pushing it, but it CAN NOT be here and there without traversing each electron on the way.  While the strings that are the BA are smaller, and are here and there FASTER than electrons, they are NOT physical to us… they are energy… stuff so small we can not detect it.  In any case, a single BA can only be HERE and THERE as LARGE as it can be, but it is NOT a solid, liquid, or gas, to us.  The smallest PARTICLE, moving at LIGHT SPEED reality, is the ELECTRON.

http://ElectronSpeed.Tumblr.Com ‪#‎LightSpeed‬  ‪#‎TheSpeedOfLight‬

The Speed of Light, a theory,

by:  Terry David Silvercloud (BUTCH)

Emulsions and Solutions

It would seem reasonable to assume that the universe structures will be the same, or similar, at all levels of size reality.  We know, for certain, that there are suns/stars that are so large, that our sun is little more than a grain of sand, by comparison.  The universe is a very BIG place.

In our day to day reality, here on Earth, we are quite familiar with emulsions and solutions.  Things that are emulsions with which you will be familiar are things like milk, paint, mud, while solutions you may be familiar with are alcohol and water, cleaning liquids.  There are many examples of both, but it can often be difficult to discern which is what.

An emulsion is a non soluble that is suspended in a liquid because the bits and pieces are so very, very small, they find a kind of buoyancy and don't easily settle out with gravity.  But you always shake/stir paint... just in case.  And, even, chocolate milk usually has a lable that says "shake well" or such.   Solutions do not settle out with gravity.  The can do this because the molecules/chemicals of which they are made, have a way of becoming separated when in water.  They form what are called ionic compounds while in solution, and there are many practical things we can do because of that.  I won't get into that here.

What is important is that you get it into your head that the universe has two really good ways for things to mix it up, but they are decidedly different in nature and results.

I want you to start thinking of the universe as a gigantic solution of, at least, two distinct kinds of something, or other, and that solution gives rise to it containing particles and acting, as well as a solution, the universe has the properties of an emulsion.  The parts are what we call matter.  But WHAT is the solution made from?  THAT... and you are going to have to take my word for it until I convince you it is the best solution to understanding reality, is called... I am introducing a new term to humanity... it is called THE BA.  The BA is the background... the STUFF that makes the solution we live within.  The emulsion part is a product of the BA and motion.   Motion initiates left and right spin which initiates TWO types of BA.   Left spinning, and right spinning BA.  Spin initiates poles.  Poles are always in conflict... and reality will go on, and on, and on forever.   With us, or without us.

The BA is like soap and water... they mix, but they don't.  Soap goes into a solution, but that initiates electronic spins and relationships which will cause it to eventually form solids... they may be rather slimey solids, but there is no longer a solution.

The BA are SMALLER than electrons.  The BA form electrons... and many other short lived 'particles' such as MUONS, and NEUTRINOS.  Under the right conditions, large BUBBLES of electrons can form PROTONS and NEUTRONS.  The key that holds these large bubbles together is their shapes and the critical linking of parts by ELECTRONS.  Electrons  hold atoms together but there is an upper limit of stability and it is related, directly, to the mathematics of the JOHNSON SOLIDS.  I mention, off and on, there are a lot of VERY LARGE numbers in the universe, but not many SMALL ones.  The universe follows simple mathematical rules.  It has no choice.

The BA are SMALLER than electrons, and serve as the grease/energy of the universe.  The Ba is always trying to get from HERE to THERE but can't go as fast as light speed... so light speed becomes defined by how long it takes the physical BA to traverse the diameter of an electron.  The BA is energy, from our point of view.  Energy is a differential in pressure, really.   Sometimes, electrons move.  When that happens we have electricity.  The electrons don't have to move too far if we spin, or vibrate them... but we can, quite easily, make electrons move through wires, or vacuums.  We do it every day.  It's happening while you look at this screen... electrons are, physically, on the move lighting up this screen causing resonance in the diodes that create the light for you... in the screen.

The universe is a solution of smaller than electron size strings and loops, all trying to find dynamic equilibrium between absolute nothingness, and the somethingness that is the BA.  They form 'bubbles' or closed strings or various shapes, but mostly closed stings of nothingness.  You will not be able to prove this until we develop tunneling gamma ray scanners... resolution at the 1 pico metre size dots.

7pm  At the Central Library uploading photos and video stuff. I try to write, a bit, each day.  Here is today's lesson from Butch... For my Blog... ARE WE THERE YET?

http://ElectronSpeed.Tumblr.Com ‪#‎LightSpeed‬  ‪#‎TheSpeedOfLight‬

The Speed of Light, a theory,

by:  Terry David Silvercloud (BUTCH)

Emulsions and Solutions

It would seem reasonable to assume that the universe structures will be the same, or similar, at all levels of size reality.  We know, for certain, that there are suns/stars that are so large, that our sun is little more than a grain of sand, by comparison.  The universe is a very BIG place.

In our day to day reality, here on Earth, we are quite familiar with emulsions and solutions.  Things that are emulsions with which you will be familiar are things like milk, paint, mud, while solutions you may be familiar with are alcohol and water, cleaning liquids.  There are many examples of both, but it can often be difficult to discern which is what.

An emulsion is a non soluble that is suspended in a liquid because the bits and pieces are so very, very small, they find a kind of buoyancy and don't easily settle out with gravity.  But you always shake/stir paint... just in case.  And, even, chocolate milk usually has a lable that says "shake well" or such.   Solutions do not settle out with gravity.  The can do this because the molecules/chemicals of which they are made, have a way of becoming separated when in water.  They form what are called ionic compounds while in solution, and there are many practical things we can do because of that.  I won't get into that here.

What is important is that you get it into your head that the universe has two really good ways for things to mix it up, but they are decidedly different in nature and results.

I want you to start thinking of the universe as a gigantic solution of, at least, two distinct kinds of something, or other, and that solution gives rise to it containing particles and acting, as well as a solution, the universe has the properties of an emulsion.  The parts are what we call matter.  But WHAT is the solution made from?  THAT... and you are going to have to take my word for it until I convince you it is the best solution to understanding reality, is called... I am introducing a new term to humanity... it is called THE BA.  The BA is the background... the STUFF that makes the solution we live within.  The emulsion part is a product of the BA and motion.   Motion initiates left and right spin which initiates TWO types of BA.   Left spinning, and right spinning BA.  Spin initiates poles.  Poles are always in conflict... and reality will go on, and on, and on forever.   With us, or without us.

The BA is like soap and water... they mix, but they don't.  Soap goes into a solution, but that initiates electronic spins and relationships which will cause it to eventually form solids... they may be rather slimey solids, but there is no longer a solution.

The BA are SMALLER than electrons.  The BA form electrons... and many other short lived 'particles' such as MUONS, and NEUTRINOS.  Under the right conditions, large BUBBLES of electrons can form PROTONS and NEUTRONS.  The key that holds these large bubbles together is their shapes and the critical linking of parts by ELECTRONS.  Electrons  hold atoms together but there is an upper limit of stability and it is related, directly, to the mathematics of the JOHNSON SOLIDS.  I mention, off and on, there are a lot of VERY LARGE numbers in the universe, but not many SMALL ones.  The universe follows simple mathematical rules.  It has no choice.

The BA are SMALLER than electrons, and serve as the grease/energy of the universe.  The Ba is always trying to get from HERE to THERE but can't go as fast as light speed... so light speed becomes defined by how long it takes the physical BA to traverse the diameter of an electron.  The BA is energy, from our point of view.  Energy is a differential in pressure, really.   Sometimes, electrons move.  When that happens we have electricity.  The electrons don't have to move too far if we spin, or vibrate them... but we can, quite easily, make electrons move through wires, or vacuums.  We do it every day.  It's happening while you look at this screen... electrons are, physically, on the move lighting up this screen causing resonance in the diodes that create the light for you... in the screen.

The universe is a solution of smaller than electron size strings and loops, all trying to find dynamic equilibrium between absolute nothingness, and the somethingness that is the BA.  They form 'bubbles' or closed strings or various shapes, but mostly closed stings of nothingness.  You will not be able to prove this until we develop tunneling gamma ray scanners... resolution at the 1 pico metre size dots.

5 September, 2015

ARE WE THERE YET?

The Speed of Light, a theory,

by:  Terry David Silvercloud (BUTCH)

Relativity and Waves

Quantum Mechanics is, fundamentally, about measuring matter and energy in units of quanta.  Thus, the quantum becomes a yardstick of our reality.  The thing is, relativity gets left in the dust.  The reason for this is that a quantum, while having the property of a wave, is never defined by frequency... or its wave length.  Thus it is not defined in time.  We think of things as a FREQUENCY and forget about the actual individual waves... the relativity, in time, of the energy packets.  Not all energy packets are created the same.  A long wave has more energy than a short wave.  A quantum has the energy of a quantum defined in electron volts... the amount of energy needed to make it stronger/whatever... becoming two quanta then three, then four, perhaps, but the relativity of it all is lost in the fog somewhere.

Waves are not always nice and smooth.  In electronics we have square waves and saw-tooth waves... you may think of them, physically, as explosions.  You may think of your average sine wave as a gentle breeze, by comparison.  In electrical/electronic circuitry, square waves are the OFF/ON waves, while saw-tooth waves are the dimmer switches.  Computers use square waves because all they know is ON/OFF.

Your computer is millions of switches that are either ON or OFF and they change with every tick of your computer clock which is running at thousands of ticks per second. The switches are contained in micro circuits... millions of transistors all on one big bed together, but separated by just enough stuff to avoid any actual body contact, and these switches turn off and on in accordance with the program that is telling them what to do and when to do it.  You don't have to have a clue how it works, because engineers and programmers figured it out and tried to make it all idiot proof for you.  You just move your mouse, or finger and click on stuff.

How large/high a wave is, tells us something about its likely IMPACT, but not how much energy it actually has... that is ENTIRELY dependent upon its WAVE LENGTH.  So, a blue wave does not have the energy of a red wave.  We tend to think of blue as a continuous stream of data packets called blue but... if we look at them as apple to apple and orange to orange, we MUST look at a SINGLE wave.  And a single wave of blue would have to be ginormous to have anywhere near the energy of a red wave.  This causes a lot of confusion in astronomy because blue stars are considered to be high energy, but the real energy is in the red stars and the red stars occupy more wave length and time/space.

Now, I will repeat this analogy from time to time... imagine you are on a beach and nice little short wave length waves are lapping at your feet... one wave a second.  No big deal.  Now you wander out a bit and you encounter larger waves... a couple of feet high and one every three seconds or so... you need to think about swimming now but, it is really no big deal.

BUT... while you are swimming you see a large wave coming... it is about 15 feet high... you are concerned... you should be... it's a mile long. You'd best be swimming for you life which will end shortly as you drown in the tsunami.

So, the question is, what kind of waves have the most energy and what is it about short waves that make them destructive?  A red hot stove is radiating heat... heat wave lengths are the same range as most body cells, and most organic cells... if they get hit with these waves they will begin to resonate so severely that the electronic bonds begin to break down and new relationships are formed with more aggressive atoms... such as oxygen.  We get fire. But... and you've heard this, the HOTTEST part of the flame is the blue part.  That, by definition, is true.  But where do these definitions come from?  Mostly, the Kelvin scale which came about when Lord Kelvin notice the changes in colour of heating up stuff like iron and carbon etc.  And, it turns out, thermometers do read higher temperatures for blue waves.  What is going on?

Quite simply, we have gone smaller than the molecular level of reality into the atomic level of reality and the atoms, themselves, are shaking... sometime so violently, that no electronic bond is going to hold them back from destruction, or recombination with whatever atoms are at hand.  The atoms are being attacked with... from their point of view... RAY GUNS.

If you get into the ULTRA VIOLET range of frequencies, you are causing resonating of atomic structures that are very very small... often at the atomic level where DNA can be torn apart from the violence of the resonating of the atoms to this frequency hitting them.  Once the frequencies become higher...  X rays, then they will pass fairly freely through most matter without too much destruction... perhaps DNA might be damaged at high levels, but it's not going to cause you to burst into flames easily... not that that isn't possible at high enough energy levels. Then we get into radio waves which are harmless, enough, at low levels.

Once we get into extremely short wave lengths... they require a lot of power to travel a lot of distance, so they can be useful for things like wi-fi, blue tooth so we get wireless head phones and wireless pretty much everything as well as flash and go credit transactions... very short range radio.  These things can require so little power that they can be powered by induction from a nearby source... the very source sending them a radio wave.  So... when you flash your credit card, the chip in the card is, momentarily powered by the very energy that asked it who it was, and it responds with a coded response word... your ID.

Tesla didn't quite understand what he was on to when he began playing with the ultra high frequencies and, although he knew he could send power through the air, he didn't quite remember all the basic laws of physics because they were still being written.  Marconi figured it out pretty quick, but Tesla didn't quite grasp that the energy, while very high energy, had little UMPH and PUSH... just data.  It can send lots, and lots of data, but not a lot of energy.   For that you need LONG waves. How electrons move more energy is quite simple... more of them do it at THE SAME TIME.  It is simple strength in numbers.  Get a trillion electrons on the job and they can move a lot of energy very fast.  If you spin them faster, they do it at a higher frequency rate.  That takes voltage.  You need to remember, if you plan to move a lot of energy, at once, you'd best build a large highway... a really big wire.

But... I digress.  I'm a motor mouth.  You need to remember that blue and red wave lengths exist, relatively, for different periods of time.  Red takes more TIME to be RED, than blue does to be BLUE.  You must take time to NOT think of the bit stream... the continuous reception of blue waves or red waves.... more blue waves will arrive AT THE SAME TIME than ONE RED WAVE.  Waves and time are linked... Einstein wasn't paying attention to that.  Just like we lump photons into "light" without thinking about the relativity of their TIME existence.  Relativity is going on so quickly we don't notice it most of the time in our electron speed/light speed reality.  Our brains are computing with electrons as bits and the bytes are very long and random because we work in analogue, with digital input provided by electrons.

Back to Quantum Physics... it's all very well that there are photons, but just what the heck is that, anyway?  All very nice is has assigned values, mathematically, but what colour is it?  Does it even have a colour or is it white.  And what is white, anyway?  The problem with photons is they defy relativity because they are not defined by wave length which would define them "in time" much better.  Are they for one second, or less? The thing is, a blue wave... a single blue wave of blue light, is so extremely short lived, you might be troubled to notice it even happening.

Frequency defines time... or is defined by time. Either way, one must not ignore wave length at the peril of ignoring relativity happening before your very eyes.   It does anyway... as you look out into the past by looking at the stars at night. Red light survives longer, in time, than blue light, so red light is what we see best... and astronomers use long, long, long time exposures to make their observations... favouring the long waves more than the short waves... so the farther anything is away, the better chance it will have red shift... just like a receding train whistle.

Remember... Einstein did not pay any attention to frequency at all.. .none in his initial ideas about relativity and light and the observer.  He paid not the least amount of attention to Doppler shift, at all.

Enough for today... one more thing, before I go...

Try to start thinking of all that matter, out there, as being bubbles of nothingness and the space 'in between' as being the something-ness of our reality so that what you see, is bubbles resonating to the frequencies around them, some of which are in the visible light spectrum... those reflections bounce right back out into the universe and we just happen to be in the path of some of them RIGHT NOW.

Now is almost a thing of fiction.  Your brain looks at its data in packets about 1/10th of a second long.  If your brain images are not refreshed that fast, your reality will begin to flicker... really, it's true.

Your nervous system, however, works at electron speed... light speed, so there is no delay in the data coming from your eye  and ear and skin receptors... just like a computer, you have a basic clock speed and it is about 12 times a second for most humans.  Your brain is updated 12 times a second and depends upon data over that kind of time spread.

http://ElectronSpeed.Tumblr.com

ARE WE THERE YET?

The Speed of Light, a theory,

by:  Terry David Silvercloud (BUTCH)

SHAPE AND SPACE

Although there are more large numbers than there are small numbers, we need to remember that large numbers are composed of small numbers.   Large things are made of smaller things.  How small is small?

Humans have examined shapes for some time.  We know the Greeks were particularly interested in shape and they get their names from that Greek investigation of shape.  Plato had decided that the tetrahedron, being the smallest 3 dimensional shape… the least number of faces, edges and vertices, must be the basic shape that tiles the universe.

The problem is, no matter how efficiently one tiles tetrahedrons, one may only fill about 85-87% of the universe… there is space ‘left over’. There is a technical glitch in those kinds of searches in that one must decide if one if looking at a cubic or spherical universe… i.e. does it have an edge or border?  That, by logic, can be decided easily because the infinite has no boundary, nor edge.  While our minds have a problem with infinity, there is no other logical choice… the universe has no choice but to be infinite.  The exact meaning of that, however, can be open to questions.

For instance, does the 'past’ still exist? Logic dictates that the past is not a place to which one may 'return’. Practical evidence shows that all things are in  motion, all at once, all of the time, therefore, returning the universe to some state in which it existed, in the past, is impoosible.  So… time travel is a ridiculous idea because you can’t go to a place if it was never a 'place’ to begin with.  Time is NOT a place.

Meanwhile, we have to ask ourselves, 'is there a smallest shape?“.  And… if so, what is that shape.  In mathematics, in a 3 dimensional reality, the smallest shape seems to be a tetrahedron because it has the least number of faces, edges, and vertices.  But, the sphere seems a better candidate because it can be equi-distant from its center at all times.  Looking around us… at the sky and at nature, it would appear that the sphere is a much better candidate under MOST situations… but not all.  It is quite apparent that solids like to take on flat surfaces (crystals) and, faced with shapes having faces, edges and vertices, the CUBE is the desirable shape, under most conditions, but the tetrahedron and octahedron are smaller and more efficient.  Also, one may take a tetrahedron, mark the centre of each edge and cut them off… making yet a smaller shape, a dual shape that can be divided in 2.  Things are not so simple to figure out as it seems.

Recent observations indicate that electrons are spheres… spherical in shape.  This has not been shown, conclusively, but the evidence is quite good.

Let’s look at tetrahedrons, again.  You could fit 4 spheres into any tetrahedron.  If you were to do that then look at the 'in between’ shape left by those 4 spheres, you have yet another interesting shape… a kind of 'keystone’ shape with 4 poles that are NOT opposites.  Such a shape would behave rather oddly in a magnetic field, would it not?  A sphere has no poles until it spins… and it can spin in TWO possible directions creating TWO DIFFERENT kinds of spheres.  You should not that fact carefully.  Spin creates poles and there is always TWO kinds of spin… left and right. This is well known to physicists, but I need to be sure you are aware of this fact.

It is easy to spin a sphere, it is hard to spin a tetrahedron.  We are looking for a basic building shape that likes to spin, or can spin and, what of those things that don’t much like to spin because of their shape and difficulty locating poles?  What is the most basic of shapes.

We tend to not like spheres as a basic shape because, mathematically, they have an infinite number of surfaces, edges, and vertices.  It is hard to construct a perfect sphere with "parts”.

There is a shape that is complex but has a lot of flexibility and that is a torus.

We could view a very skinny torus as a closed loop or closed string.  If you have oil and water, or two fluids that don’t want to mix, you have what we call an emulsion.  Emulsions have a tendency to settle out with gravity, but would, seemingly, remain in an emulsified state if under constant energy input/output (such as being shaken), or if gravity were non existent or without a center.  We see bubbles all the time… it seems all quite natural for reality to form bubbles… spheres.  And spheres can become torri if they spin quickly, or flatten out a bit and develop a 'hole’ in themselves.

The beauty of 'strings’ is their flexibility… to change shape, as it were.  Strings are just stretched out 'bubbles’ if you think about it.  If you had a material that, like soap or oil, easily formed bubbles, you have a very neat material with which to construct material reality.

I propose that electrons are composed of strings that have formed a mathematically stable shape… not certain what it is, but my mind suggests it should be an icosahedron.

ARE WE THERE YET?

The Speed of Light, a theory,

by:  Terry David Silvercloud (BUTCH)

LIFE

What is life?  Well... that's the $64 question, isn't it?  All I can tell you is what I have observed.  Life requires pattern... a circuit.  It seems to need to be initiated in one way, or anther.  And, one thing I'm fairly certain of is this... when electron flow stops, so does life.

Our bodies use electricity for its nerve circuits.  It is direct current and alternating current... frequency based/vibration based circuits.  In both cases, it is an analogue kind of circuitry for the most part.  The only digital part is that an electric 'spark' or current can cause a muscle to contract, an eye to blink, as it were.  Or a heart to beat.

When it comes to the brain, it seems the thinking is based upon analogue inputs from various circuits such as the eyes, skin, nose, etc. and digital outputs to muscles while messaging inside the brain is both analogue and digital.  We know that sparks jump in nerve cells.  One might assume that is a digital signal. The only reason I'm really bringing up the subject of LIFE, here, is that I want to remind you that our bodies depend VERY much upon electrons, and the flow of electrons.  We would be very much dead without that.

And... to remind you I keep telling you that we live in a "LIGHT SPEED" world and reality... an electron speed reality.  Our reality is composed primarily of electrons... so much so, one might say it is composed entirely of electrons with 'holes' in it.  That is to say... take time to think of the universe... of reality, kind of like the way you view a negative that makes a photograph.  What you see is the photograph, but what it really looks like... is the negative.  Think of reality as SOMETHINGNESS with lots of tiny holes/bubbles in it.  The empty holes are what we think of as matter, while the 'in between' stuff we think of as nothingness is actually the somethingness... lots, and lots, and lots, and lots of electrons.  And the electrons are made of yet smaller 'strings' that become stable balls/holes/structures (icosahedral shaped particles) that can, and do spin, or move, or 'wiggle' as required.

These electrons form a field, sometimes... kind of like you would think of the Higg's Boson/field and, in the exact right conditions, form a more complex shape, or shapes.  Some of these shapes are very short lived... neutrinos and muons etc. but, sometimes, if things are just right, just long enough, larger structures can form... quarks that might have enough time to become protons, etc.  Or neutrons.  All are dependent upo shape and numbers.

Remember, kids, what I told you... in the infinite, there are a LOT of VERY LARGE numbers, but there aren't a lot of small ones... 1, 2, 3, 4 etc.  And, so, it is with all things... math has a way of predicting how many of what have to happen when for such and such to happen.  The thing is, the very large numbers are the numbers of small numbers... weird, huh?  The point is that there are lots, and lots of singles out there in the particle world looking to get 'hooked up' under the right conditions.

[Start thinking more of how bubbles form in a soap dish, or anywhere... how clouds form.  Nature has a desire to join up or break away.  Reality is a bit like oil and water.  Some parts want to join, others to push away.  The electrons are doing the pushing out of the way because they are material reality... but very, very small.  Even if they filled the universe, there would always be a bit of space left over... I'll talk about that in another blog... how it is impossible to tile tetrahedrons, etc... or spheres.  I'll talk about spheres and tetrahedrons in a separate blog.]

Life is like that... under the right circumstances, once a pattern is made, it might simply keep reproducing itself.  How mind works... I ain't gots a clue. Of one thing I am certain... I'm very sure the universe is unfolding exactly as it must and should.  It has no choice and what will be, will be.