dandeliondaisy replied to your post: I’m quite puzzled here. You continue to post some of the most laudable works of art ever produced in history and even choose them with a certain degree of discernment or taste. And yet you intermingle these masterpieces with animated gifs and other childish, girlie, groupie kind of infatuation for music and television idols. I’m left wondering whether you truly admire these paintings you post to some extent or if it’s just a nice attachment with which to decorate your blog. No offense, please.
I like the addition of “no offense, please” to the end of the message.
I know, right? A real charmer.
earnestfreckles replied to your post: I’m quite puzzled here. You continue to post some of the most laudable works of art ever produced in history and even choose them with a certain degree of discernment or taste. And yet you intermingle these masterpieces with animated gifs and other childish, girlie, groupie kind of infatuation for music and television idols. I’m left wondering whether you truly admire these paintings you post to some extent or if it’s just a nice attachment with which to decorate your blog. No offense, please.
It’s spelled “girly”, actually, and no amount of fancy language gives you dignity when you’re insulting someone else.
Eh people should learn that calling someone 'childish' isn't really an insult. He/she tried though.
electric-eels replied to your post: I’m quite puzzled here. You continue to post some of the most laudable works of art ever produced in history and even choose them with a certain degree of discernment or taste. And yet you intermingle these masterpieces with animated gifs and other childish, girlie, groupie kind of infatuation for music and television idols. I’m left wondering whether you truly admire these paintings you post to some extent or if it’s just a nice attachment with which to decorate your blog. No offense, please.
what the fuck? this is obnoxious.
Nah, it's actually hilarious. Second anon hate message I got.