The ability to think/see things broadly is sorely lacking today. Part 5.
The following is from a comment I made in response to a thread that was discussing the effect of dynamic pressure (pressures generated by movement) in water on watches. I may have gotten a little spicy in my remarks.
The people here who talk about additional pressure due to movement under water (i.e. dynamic pressure) don't know what they're talking about, and the people who claim that 50m WR is not enough for pool activities based on very general guidelines and "recommendations" probably have no personal experience that demonstrates otherwise.
In real-world applications dynamic pressure is negligible under most conditions with regards to human aquatic activity, and I will prove it here.
See this article, particularly the section with the example (about 2/3 of the way down the page). Using the equation (velocity squared) = (2 x dynamic pressure)/density, note that in order to obtain a dynamic pressure in water that is just under 0.1 atm (10 kPa or 10000 Pa, i.e. an additional 1m WR requirement), water flow has to be nearly 4.5 m/s (which comes out to almost 10 mph), which is absurdly fast and humanly impossible even at surface-level swimming. This is assuming that arm speed in water is equal to overall swim speed (but arm speed in water is actually likely to be less than overall swim speed because the legs are also providing propulsion), which may not be the case for other aquatic activities. This also suggests that at surface-level swimming i.e. zero hydrostatic pressure (note that total pressure, which is what is indicated by WR ratings, is static + dynamic pressure), just 1m WR is required to withstand the dynamic pressures generated by the superhuman swimming speed of 10 mph.
Doing the math with regards to my own lap swimming, the only time I do anything at serious speed is my 100m freestyle sprint in the middle of my swim, which at my fastest takes me around 1'15" (or 1.25 minutes) in trunks. This comes out to roughly 80m/minute (or 1.33 m/s), which converts to just under 3 mph, which is half that of the fastest unassisted human swimmers. Plugging this into the dynamic pressure equation (to solve for dynamic pressure, not velocity), we use 1.33 m/s for v (or 8/6 for more precision) and get a dynamic pressure of 888.89 pascals (Pa). Note that 1 atm = 101325 Pa, so the dynamic pressure I generate in my 100m freestyle sprint is roughly 0.0088 atm. With regards to a WR rating, my sprinting speed has added 0.088m to WR requirements.
EDIT: With regards specifically to limb movements (not overall swimming speed) in water, to generate the dynamic pressures needed to substantively increase the WR requirement, say, by an additional 10m or 1 atm, you'd have to be moving your arms in the water at speeds of roughly 14.24 m/s, which comes out to just under 32 mph. For reference, the fastest recorded punch in air is 45 mph by a boxer. Water resistance will likely reduce limb speeds by half or more (due to water being more than 800x denser than air), meaning that it is probably not humanly possible to generate dynamic pressures needed to substantively increase a watch's WR requirement. The overall point is that regardless of whether you consider limb speed or total movement speed in water, it is not humanly possible without mechanical assistance to generate the kind of dynamic pressure that would affect a watch's WR requirement.