The Dakota Access Pipeline and Keystone XL Pipeline have been resurrected. This means we must organize and activate to combat and resist this dangerous administration.
What Iâm doing - contacting my banks asking directly if they use my money to fund pipeline projects. Paying off my loan with Chase Bank *consolidating through a low interest check from Discover Card- in a response from Michael Ristano, from Discover's Executive Office of Customer Advocacy, I was assured "Discover Card does not have investments related to the pipeline.". If they are involved with funding I will borrow money to pay everything off and set up a fair payment plan locally. (Mom? Successful local business?)
The real leaders of this country already deemed both the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines unnecessary threats which should not be completed. But yesterday, with the swipe of a pen Donald Trump signed two actions reviving the dangerous projects. They threaten clean water and environmental health as we go forth in a world that is experience climate change regardless of the ignorance the current administration accepts.
âPresident Trump is showing that heâs in the pocket of big corporations and foreign oil interests,â said CREDO Deputy Political Director Josh Nelson. âApproving these dirty oil pipelines would poison American air and water, supercharge climate change and trample Native American rights,â Nelson continued. âFierce grassroots activism has stopped these pipelines over and over again,â he added. âCREDO will do everything in its power to stop the Dakota Access and Keystone XL pipelines, and keep dirty fossil fuels in the ground where they belong.â
âWe will be taking legal action, and will take this fight head on,â said Standing Rock Sioux Tribe in a press release, after leaders emerged from their morning meeting. âToday, Trump announced an executive order on DAPL; it not only violates the law, but it violates tribal treaties. Nothing will deter us from our fight for clean water.â -motherboard.vice.com
Why the Dakota Access pipelineâs project is invalid, and who we should REALLY be listening to (THE ARMY):
âIn December⊠the Army said it would not â for the time being â allow the pipeline to cross under Lake Oahe. The Army said the plan should be carefully restudied, and alternative routes should be deeply considered.
In her letter to the Army Corps, Jo-Ellen Darcy, the Armyâs assistant secretary for civil works, called for the creation of an official environmental impact statement, a monthslong process that would allow the public to weigh in.â -CNN.com
Why the Keystone XL pipelineâs project is invalid, and who we should REALLY be listening to (EDUCATED POLITICIANS):
âIn 2011, the Obama administration said it would delay a decision on the pipeline until at least 2013 to allow for more time to study the issues and to look at possible alternative routes.
Exercising his veto power for the first time in five years, Obama rejected legislation giving the go-ahead for construction of the pipeline in February 2015.
The White House said then it opposed the bill because it would have usurped the Presidentâs authority to approve or deny the creation of the pipeline and short-circuit the State Department analysis.
In November 2015, Obama nixed the proposed pipeline, virtually ending the fight over the project that had gone on for much of his presidency.
Then-Secretary of State John Kerry concluded the project was not in the countryâs national security interest.â -CNN.com
YOU CANT EAT MONEY AND YOU CANT DRINK OIL
DIVEST
According to Ruth Hopkins, a former judge for the Spirit Lake Nation and Crow Creek Sioux Tribe, People are mobilizing by removing funds from banks with connections to the Dakota Access Pipeline âto the tune of more than 50 million dollars currently,â Trump owns stock in Energy Transfer Partners, the company building the pipeline.
Chase Bank, a corporate sponsor of (advertiser at) Robert Redfordâs Sundance Film Festival is one of many banks that are using your money to fund the Dakota Access pipeline. Urge Sundance to find a more appropriate sponsor and divest your debt from Chase Bank.
Wells Fargo, along with 16 other banks, is a lender to the Dakota Access Pipeline project. Wells Fargo has $120 million in a $2.5 billion credit agreement to fund the pipeline project, according to Jessica R. Ong of Wells Fargo Corporate Communications. Thatâs your money, not Wells Fargos.
Ask a friend or family member to hold your loan and help you divest or transfer to a âconflict freeâ bank or credit union.
TD Bank, Wells Fargo, Chase Bank, Citigroup, US Bank, are all using your money to finance this project. Without your money, they cannot continue. And even you donât want to remove your money, threatening to do so in a letter, email or phone call to your bank urging them to divest is a powerful statement.
Norwegian has pulled out of Dakota Access as one of the largest financiers.
âIn their battles with banks, environmentalists have scored some early victories. After a concerted effort by climate-change campaigners, several global banks, including Barclays, ING and Deutsche Bank, stepped back over the last two years from projects that involve mountaintop removal mining, a practice experts say is particularly damaging to the environment. Earlier this year, JPMorgan Chase announced that it would no longer finance new coal-fired power plants in the United States or other wealthy nations, a retreat that followed similar announcements by Bank of America, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley. The banksâ move away from coal, however, appeared motivated as much by the plunging profitability of coal as by concerns over climate change.â -nytimes.com
17 banks on the project loan for the Dakota Access Pipeline (Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, BayernLB, BBVA, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Crédit Agricole, DNB ASA, ICBC, ING, Intesa Sanpaolo, Mizuho Bank, Natixis, SMBC, Société Générale, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, TD Bank, Wells Fargo)