Approach To Criticize
In Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking (public library) â the same fantastic volume that gave us Dennett on the dignity and art-science of making mistakes â he offers what he calls âthe best antidote [for the] tendency to caricature oneâs opponentâ: a list of rules formulated decades ago by the legendary social psychologist and game theorist Anatol Rapoport, best-known for originating the famous tit-for-tat strategy of game theory. Dennett synthesizes the steps:
How to compose a successful critical commentary:
You should attempt to re-express your targetâs position so clearly, vividly, and fairly that your target says, âThanks, I wish Iâd thought of putting it that way. You should list any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement). You should mention anything you have learned from your target. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
If only the same code of conduct could be applied to critical commentary online, particularly to the indelible inferno of comments.
But rather than a naively utopian, Pollyannaish approach to debate, Dennett points out this is actually a sound psychological strategy that accomplishes one key thing: It transforms your opponent into a more receptive audience for your criticism or dissent, which in turn helps advance the discussion.
