#DanLaustsen, ASC: It was a small movie so we had a lot of problems with that. I think it was roughly 19-1/2-million-dollars budget and a fifty-five day shoot, plus everything is shot in one camera. There are a lot of camera movements, of course, so everything is shot on a Steadicam, or on a dolly, with a hot head on. We also couldn’t afford to to have catwalks around the sets, so that was just kind of a drag, especially because the sets were so tall and wide.So all the key lights had to come from above. What I was doing, a lot, we would try to track the camera with handheld lighting from the camera’s axis. We’ll be starting with a big wide shot, like the first time Sally is coming in to the lab, for example, and the fish man is going into the tank. That’s a big, wide Steadicam shot, which comes in to a close-up of her.So we are carrying an LED light, together with the camera, at a 45 degree angle to keep the close up of her lit very, very nicely. On Crimson Peak, we had the money, so we could put lights in the frame and just paint it out later on. We didn’t have those monies for the Shape of Water, so we had to be more practical with our lighting, and more straightforward.We would carry some of our key lights into close ups, and I think that worked pretty well. I’m using negative fill all the time, too. That’s more so that we can come in closer. The brakes would come in, and flags, so a lot of negative fill. As much as possible we wanted to have this “direction” look of the light. The light had to have a direction, and that can change from shot to shot.Sometimes we were using an old fashioned camera light, just above the camera. You know, a small 300w, with diffusion on, just to lift up her eyes a little bit. We used that in the bus, for example, where she’s sitting there and she feels happy. We had this small 300 camera light just above the camera to lift her up a little bit.
Read full article with @dan.laustsen on Chimera Lighting Chasing Light blog. link in bio.http://chimeralighting.com/shape-of-water/