Right. Because it’s not like many of the people who are against police abolishment explicitly say they’ve experienced violence, including folks who’ve personally had to stop assailants.
And absolutely none of those people explicitly say citizens should be armed able to use violence in self-defense.Â
Which would mean the state does not have a monopoly on violence.
And attacking the critic is totally an actual response, and not a deflection., daggers-drawn.
And nobody ever has a monopoly on violence in anarchist states. No warlords, ever.
Ol’ DD continues to be an intellectual Lilliputian.

















