seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from Canada
seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Germany
#diwali WITH 2 FORMER #hongkong LEADERS #cyleung 2012-2017 #donaldtsang 2005-2012, SECRETARY FOR HOME AFFAIRS @caspartsui AND OUR #policecommissioner #roshanmelwani #samstailor #hongkong (at Conrad Hotel, Hong Kong) https://www.instagram.com/p/CV2d0IpPoM1/?utm_medium=tumblr
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Political Own Goal
How Hong Kong has come to this? It is a sad day for Hong Kong that it has lost the power to enact a security law that was given to the government of the Special Administrative Region under Article 23 of the Basic Law. Defining treason, sedition, subversion from the perspective of the People Republic of China will no doubt be very different from defining these terms from a Hong Kong perspective. Article 23 has just one sentence and no ambiguity. It says,
"The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People’s Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies."
Basic Law is the mini-constitution that sets out how Hong Kong should be governed after 1997. The intention is to set out the parameter and impose restraints and obligations on both the government of the People Republic of China and the SAR government. Article 23 is very clear and the responsibility rests with the HKSAR government to enact a security law. After 23 years and 4 chief executives, different political parties in the legislature (the LegCo) have failed to work together, find a compromise and enact one piece of legislation that could have far-reaching consequences on the human rights of Hong Kong citizens. Is 23 years a reasonable time-frame to pass one piece of legislation? What does it say about the competence of the political class in Hong Kong? Quite rightly, people understand the significance of this piece of legislation and its ramifications. Their concerns are on full display to the world by the passionate demonstrations on the street. Hong Kong people deserve an answer but there is no hope for a public inquiry on this blatant dereliction of responsibilities and how we have come to this. Two things we can be certain: (1) the blame game continues, and (2) this is not the fault of millions of hardworking Hong Kong people making sacrifices daily and earning a meager wage to make Hong Kong such a vibrant city. The political class on both sides of the divide since the handover from Britain to China and those who have the ability to influence the political process and outcome directly or indirectly will have a lot to answer for to the Hong Kong people. It is a political own goal that gives the Beijing government the opportunity, at this chaotic time, to step in to enact such an important piece of legislation. History will judge those responsible harshly.
測試facebook新表情方法
多謝偉大嘅特首！
CY喺fb 出po，等我地呢班冇得留comment嘅廢青，
一齊俾唔同emotion佢。
點答我係香港人定係中國人而又唔會跌民望或減Like. 簡單三個字以後唔使唔知點答#CYLeung #必睇 #網民Friendly #goeasynow #donthatetheplayerhatethegame http://youtu.be/v6eX3ciwXnU
梁特的回應[回帶?]模式
發現呢個pattern嘅，唔係時事分析員，係the pancakes。
街外人都睇穿，係咪得佢自己唔知？
LINK
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
【世界上最契弟最小學雞的語言偽術】 10月20日，《紐約時報》梁振英專訪節錄：「你需要盡可能照顧到香港每一個階層，如果選舉只是數字上的遊戲，那你就會向那半數月入低於一千八百美元的市民埋手。」 10月29日，特首辦發表聲明：「行政長官從未發表『月薪一萬四千元的人士不享有行政長官選舉的提名權』的言論。」 689又真係冇講過「14K論」，因為佢講嘅係「一千八百美元」（一千八百美元約為一萬四千零四十港元）。
My links with foreign countries are limited to my Korean cellphone, my American computer and my Japanese Gundam. And of course, all of these are ‘Made in China'.
Hong Kong student leader Joshua Wong (黃之鋒), in response to Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) who said in an interview with ATV that he wouldn't "... go into details, but this is not entirely a domestic movement".
His comments echoed Chinese state media, which has repeatedly alleged that “anti-China forces” such as the US are manipulating the protesters, while Beijing has warned against foreign meddling in what it says is an internal affair.
Commentaries on the mainland have also increasingly described the Hong Kong protests as a “color revolution” — a term used by Beijing for political movements funded by international forces.
