Influence + Choice Feminism: a Podcast Recommendation from #CROPT
What happens when feminism runs up against the wild world of social media influencers? When feminism wants to sell us something, are likely are we to disentangle capitalist ideology from pop-feminist rhetoric?Â
On team cropt, we’ve been thinking a little about choice feminism, which in the words of writer Haley Nahman, tells us that “any choice a woman makes is inherently feminist, and any criticism of those choices is therefore anti-feminist.” It’s the feminism that’s concerned (as Nahman puts it) with “individual action and individual empowerment” but “isn’t scalable.”Â
For more on choice feminism, join us listening (and re-listening) to Nahman’s interview on Adulting with Oenone Forbat available wherever you get your favorite podcasts.Â
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
(L to R Hannah Hopkins, Nadya Naumaan, Jared Bellot, and Will Kiley)
Hello! My name is Hannah Hopkins, and I am the Dramaturg for Daria Miyeko Marinelli’s CROPT.
To me, dramaturgy is a collaborative process in support of the play: we’re figuring out how to ask new and better questions together in real time.
We felt it was important to share this play now because in this moment, we have the opportunity and obligation to confront the violence that has always already been just beyond the surface of what we desire and take for granted.Â
My role will help this new play by finding, facilitating, and supporting ways to connect critical voices and ways of knowing to the world(s) of CROPTÂ
Hello! My name is Nadya Naumaan, and I am the Dramaturg for Being Julia Roberts.
To me, dramaturgy is
 being a play detective - serve the truth of the play..  Â
We felt it was important to share this play now because
 Islamophobia still exists in the US. Also levity is important and we love Julia Roberts. Can these things exist in a play together? Only Abbas knows.
My role will help this new play by
 providing research, listening, and providing endless enthusiasm. Â
Hello! My name is Jared (he/him),  and I am the Dramaturg for Michael Jackson and the Devil's Book by Terry Guest!Â
To me, dramaturgy is getting to have lots of really good conversations and getting to ask a lot of really good questions (not expecting an answer in return).Â
We felt it was important to share this play now because Black lives and Black stories and Black myths and Black people matter now. And always.Â
My role will help this new play by helping to facilitate the journey of the creative team through lots of ambiguity and uncertainty. And serving as the biggest cheerleader/sounding board/hype man to the my INCREDIBLY TALENTED AND INCREDIBLY BRILLIANT collaborators, Terry and Wardell.Â
Hello! My name is  Will Kiley,  and I am the Dramaturg for P_A_N_G_E_A by Calamity West.Â
To me, dramaturgy is bridging the rehearsal room and the outside public, advocating for the playwright and director’s intentions, crafting questions that help either open or close the play.Â
We felt it was important to share this play now because the tempo of 2020 is causing us to reevaluate our senses of self while shaking up our histories and dreams.Â
My role will help this new play by listening and responding to Calamity and Regina’s work, craft nurturing questions and feedback, invite the public into our process, notice trends and patterns, track the ways Calamity and Regina’s intentions show up within each iteration of the script.Â
A confession: Neopets is the only reason I have a job. I feel like I’m exactly the right age to have grown up spending countless hours blinking at the Neopets interface, willing myself to understand just what was meant by a long block of HTML. If you’re like me, you remember graduating to Xanga, then MySpace layouts, then the big show: building your own website. I wonder often whatever happened to the pages I designed on Microsoft FrontPage fifteen years ago or the Blogger or Tumblr sites I was so excited to “launch.” I have to believe that they’re all still out there somewhere, locked away to me by chains of broken passwords I swore I’d never forget. In so many ways, that’s where CROPT begins, too.Â
CROPT asks us to think about what’s inside and behind the infrastructures we take for granted, the systems we use to make ourselves into something else. This post is about part of that infrastructure: the internet. We couldn’t be making CROPT right now, of course, without the internet -- without the thousands of blinking data centers around the world that draw energy and resources and labor to support our Zoom connections, our Tumblr blog, our Google Docs and iMessages and FaceTimes and the countless other tools we use to make creative work.
But what happens when we see the things we’re not supposed to see? What happens when we want to see what data centers and cloud computing demand of land?
In April 2015, Google released a short video introducing a new platform for cloud computing. Set against soaring instrumental pop music, the advertisement showcases several Google employees — nearly all white men — extolling the technical excellence of Google Actual Cloud, “the world’s first cloud offering running on servers in the troposphere, inside actual clouds.” Google Actual Cloud appears as just that: actual white clouds of data floating above crowds of rapturous onlookers. As a throng of awed Googlers assembles under the shadow of Google Actual Cloud, one of the only two speaking women in the video adds that, “I just love that I can see it.”
Of course, Google Actual Cloud is an exceptionally well-branded April Fool’s Day joke, but I’m interested to think about why and how it is so effective. Even as multinational tech corporations like Google engage in concerted public efforts to visibilize the cloud through art projects and splashy employment advertisements, there is still a need for interventions that address the felt effects of  our hyper-reliance on the internet,. I think the woman in the video has a point when she says that she loves that she can see “it.”
GOOGLE BOOKS
CRPOT invites us to think about the risks we take when we want to see the violence visited on human bodies in service of the technical infrastructure we take for granted. One site for that kind of seeing is Google Books. Announced in 2004, Google Books is the massive digitization project that made 20 million of books available online. That digitization was done by humans contract workers, bodies that Google attempted to render invisible.
Andrew Norman Wilson, a 2007 Google employee, was shocked when he first realized the cohort of mostly Black and Latinx workers clad in yellow badges he would see each afternoon were actually Google Books digitizers along the fringes of the complex. He writes that his interest began to consume him:
I mined all the information about the yellow badges that I could from Google’s intranet, which led me to the internal name for the team—ScanOps. This class of workers, who left the building much like the industrial proletariat of a bygone era, actually performed the Fordist labor of digitization for Google Books—“scanning” printed matter from the area’s university libraries page by page […] I found some vague meeting notes […] about how they would be excluded from all standard privileges like cafes, bikes, shuttles, and even access to other buildings. […] Why did it seem so secretive?
Norman Wilson’s later project, “Workers Leaving the GooglePlex” attempts to capture the striation and unevenness of Google workers’ status using surveillance camera footage and narration.
Google Books digitization workers’ bodies do appear materially in the content of many Google Books online scans. The Art of Google Books collects images of the many Google Books scans that include errors, including scans that feature the hands of Google Books workers. These images are captivating, in large part because they represent an intimacy with the ScanOps workers that by Google’s own design was impossible. Vulnerable to the occupational hazard of repetitive assembly-line style labor, bodies refuse erasure in the Google Books corpus, and the unpredictability of those traces renders Google’s lack of commitment to workers legible.
From The Art of Google Books, a scan of Red Feather: A Comic Opera in Two Acts that features the ScanOps team member’s hands.
GOOGLE ARTS
A recent effort on Google’s part to make internet infrastructure both visible and beautiful has been the 2016 Data Center Mural Project. A promotional video depicts several artists creating large-scale murals on the exterior of data centers, with one artist defining his mission as “[making] something joyful and colorful and try to make people happy.” According to the video’s prefatory material, the murals are meant to make data centers, and in turn internet infrastructures and involved labor visible to a broader public. The narration explains that in Google’s large global data center campuses, “the people and  machinery work 24/7 to make things run faster, safer and more efficiently. So much goes in to running the internet inside these buildings, we decided it was time to reflect that on the outside.” It is unclear whether such a project’s focus on aesthetics of technological infrastructure does indeed transfer the same positive affect to citizens, observers, or other laborers; but it does call to mind Norman Wilson’s surveillance videos of ScanOps exiting a Google complex. Are workers like the ScanOps team meant to feel joy at the beauty superimposed on infrastructure meant to occlude their very presence? What does that mean for us as users?
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Detached analytical rationalization can result in "Can't see the Woods for the Trees".
The "Cropt" Series explores rare animal hair as measured cubic segments, representing our methods for analyzing creatures so we can better understand them, while we loose focus on their existence as a whole.