Direct sum is not the coproduct in the category of quadratic vector spaces. The absence of terminal objects and (co)products in QVec is due to the fact that projections do not generally preserve norms.
José Figueroa O'Farrill, Spin Geometry
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Pakistan
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Pakistan
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
Direct sum is not the coproduct in the category of quadratic vector spaces. The absence of terminal objects and (co)products in QVec is due to the fact that projections do not generally preserve norms.
José Figueroa O'Farrill, Spin Geometry

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
what is it about the binary coproducts of finite sets that makes A+B = A+C imply B = C? (note: “=“ means “is isomorphic to” in this post)
it’s easy to see that this isn’t the case for general coproducts, and indeed this isn’t even true for infinite sets, since strict inequalities of infinite sets A>B>C imply A+B = A+C = A (maybe you need choice for that?)
so apparently the property of interest isn’t a consequence of FinSet being a topos, nor the fact that its coproducts are freely generated
what’s so special about coproducts in FinSet, and where else does A+B = A+C imply B = C?