a question about IV rater
i have a burning question about how the IV rater works.
āFirst, he'll rate your Pokemon's entire IV total.
If it is 90 or fewer, he will say that it has "decent" potential.
91 to 120, he will say that it has "above average" potential.
121 to 150, he will say that it has "relatively superior" potential.
151 or more, he'll say it has "outstanding" potential.
Next, he'll rate your highest IV.
If it's 15 or lower, he'll say it's "rather decent".
16 to 25, he'll say it's "good".
26 to 30, he'll say it's "fantastic".
For a 31 IV, he'll say it "can't be beat!"
He'll make note of ties for the highest stat. Also, any stats that have an IV of zero will be commented upon as well.ā
iām IV breeding for Growlithes to evolve into Arcanines in Pokemon X, and the IV raterās system confuses me.
first heāll say itās overall IV total (āoutstandingā 151+,Ā ādecentā < 90, etc.)Ā
then heāll talk about each IV value separately (ādefense is goodā 16-26, speed is equally goodā 16-25, āspecial attack is just as good, thoughā 16-25, etc.)
and by the end he says something like,Ā āthese stats are fantasticā orĀ āthese stats canāt be beat!ā
when he says that bit at the end, is he actually referring to the greatest IV value (ex.Ā āHP has the greatest potentialā means itās the highest, and if he saysĀ ācanāt be beat!ā at the end, then your HP IV is a perfect 31, and no other stat is a perfect one)? or is he referring to all of the values, rendering the information iāve given above moot (is my source shitty? is it not explaining something? have i misunderstood?)?
this is probably a stupid question since i havenāt slept in over 24 hours, but iād like an answer anyway