#code enforcement

Government: Town of Front Royal, VirginiaBody: Town Council & MayorDate: March 23, 2026, 7:00 PMLocation: Warren County Government CenterType: Public CommentTimestamp: 03:07:10Duration: 02:15 Houses in Front Royal Sometimes it only takes one image. One building. One location. One photo that gets shared enough times to start standing in for everything else. That’s what’s happening with Sixth…

As concerns the violation at 4433 Ruthann Court, number VIO2015-06105.  To: BOCC 6/8/2015

- The violation seems to refer to a removable bypass window fan system that I custom made, a personal vendetta courtesy of Lee County employee Vincent Berta, one trashy bribe taking son of a bitch.

Re: Needed Oversight of Lee County Code Enforcement.

Outside examination of issued code violations should be based on two separate conditions, both with equal weight.

Issued violations should be examined as to their accuracy in designating a true condition or instance of variance from or non compliance with ordinances or building code, by building code experts and by County Commissioners, as is the present rule.

A greater effort should be made in determining officer abuse of power by examining the context of issued violations and any relationships between any and all parties involved to discover officers who are inclined to abuse their authority. Officers issuing violations as a means to threaten, harass, intimidate, exact retribution or extort money from property owners or force eviction of a property owner’s tenant should be considered not fit for duty and dismissed.  If examined as a whole, chronologically an officer’s body of violations issued can show clearly patterns of harassment, coercion, bribery and incompetence. Over time such patterns are often extremely revealing, as often entrenched criminality, a lack of collected revenue from fines and other types of extortion become sadly evident. It is of utmost importance that outside personnel with expertise in deciphering the patterns resulting from violations issued should be involved in the oversight management of code enforcement officers.

a) In no way does a violation issued by an officer who does so in a blatantly harassing manner diminish the legitimacy of the content of the violation. If the stated violation does truly does not indicate a departure from code or ordinance the violation itself must stand. There remains the context within which the violation was issued. If the violation is part of an effort of harassment and intimidation both aspects of the issuance of that violation can hold, that is the violation is legitimate but its issuance was a part of a scheme of harassment. Accuracy of issuance doesn't clear the issuance of a violation from being a part of an act of harassment.

b) A sound violation of unquestionable legitimacy, issued by an officer in a fashion obviously meant to extort, harass or threaten in itself holds no sway to exonerate or excuse an officer from disciplinary action, dismissal or criminal prosecution, regardless that the violation is legitimate. Legitimacy of a violation and ulterior intent in its issuance are and will be seen as unrelated and separate considerations.

c) Code enforcement officers may never have the authority to self-determine the lack of harassment in their own or their fellow officer’s suspect issued violations. No code enforcement officer will ever have the last word as to whether his violation should or should not fall under scrutiny for egregious issuance.

d) Officers guilty of harassing owners by issuing violations with an ulterior intent to threaten are subject to criminal prosecution.

e) Officers threatening property owners with excessive scrutiny and a campaign of inevitable violations of their properties as a means of extorting anything shall be subject to criminal prosecution.

Non Enforcement of Trash Code:

  Dismiss all officers, who for whatever reason refuse to enforce the ordinances that require rental property owners to maintain the absence of trash and garbage from the rental properties they own. The prevalence of abundant trash in some of the less affluent neighborhoods in Lee County hints and suggests homes that are rife with disease and neglect; the untended trash supports overlooked and forgotten neighborhoods of squalor, images of children who appear unsafe and uncared for and desolate areas occupied by those of a “lower caste” who would scurry about in filth. Nothing damns a poor neighborhood more than a fucking “tradition” of trash scattered around homes and gathering areas that should be in a solid clean container. A code enforcement officer who would allow a property owner to ignore the trash ordinances and simultaneously describe the people in that same neighborhood as a bunch of trashy people has no business wearing the uniform of a public servant. The trash in these less affluent neighborhoods is not the trash of the people who live their; it is the trash forced on them by the lazy, dishonest and wretchedly evil property owners and code enforcement officers who would falsely condemn other people as something short of human and expect all of us to find their deceit unrecognizable in the haze their longstanding well entrenched corruption. It is shameful. 

M H O’Neal

I was pleasantly surprised by the maps in the report: “Detroit: A New City” from the Mayor’s Committee on Community Renewal and prepared by the City of Detroit, Department Report and Information Committee. The city’s Community Renewal Program (CRP) was the vehicle for studying and planning Detroit’s future amidst the federal urban renewal regime. For better or worse the CRP produced numerous…

Home’s eccentric paint job in Naples attracts criticism from neighbors

:not([class~=ArticleBody-ad]) iframe{border:0;} .Article-paragraph { font-size: 18px!important; line-height: 30px; } ]]>

News

With paint-splattered and sprayed in multiple bright colors all over the house, trees, lawn and even the mailbox, the home almost looks like something out of a cartoon.

Friday, January 24th 2020, 6:22 PM EST by Alex Howard

Updated:

Fri…