pre-class response, class 22, group B
The reading, “On The Tartars”, has Ibn Al-Athir stating:
“For even Antichrist will spare such as follow him, though he destroy those who oppose him, but these Tatars spared none, slaying women and men and children, ripping open pregnant women and killing unborn babes.”
This shows the Mongols as unbelievably cruel and torturous. If anyone were to read Ibn Al-Athir’s account, it would seem as the Mongols are the worst people to exist. After all, they are worse than the Antichrist himself, which is saying a lot.
However, reading “The Account of The Mongols”, William of Rubruck has a lot of positive language that is used to describe the Mongols. They are described as systematic people, with a place for everyone in society (the Master, the Mistress, the men, the women). Reading William’s account, one would assume that the Mongols are just another group of people with their own ways of doing things.
William had a more neutral language in describing the Mongols. On the other hand, the extreme contrast in these two readings just goes to show the extreme bias that Ibn Al-Athir could have had against the Mongols (perhaps because he was not treated as well as he would have liked to be).









