A common superstition in DewClan is that, if someone has been extraordinarily lucky in succession, then horrible fortune will befall them soon. Lucky cats are viewed as bad omens in this Clan, and many take care to avoid someone with a lucky streak until the streak is broken.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
4. Prey is killed only to be eaten. Give thanks to StarClan for its life.
As you might have noticed, I removed this rule from this blog’s Warrior Code, and replaced it with the third law (Do not hunt needlessly, for StarClan shows no mercy to the wasteful).
Why, you might ask?
Simple. Cats, from what I could gather, usually don’t hunt nicely. They play with their prey until it runs out of energy, and then kill it. Cats don’t go straight for the killing bite, because it leaves them exposed and the prey could fight back and attack, and that scratch or that bite could get infected. For cats, infected wounds are pretty bad. Playing with your prey means it gets tired, and tired prey don’t fight back, or at least, not as well as they could.
I vaguely remember how the rule in canon was added, and that was because some ShadowClan kits were playing with a dead mouse or something. After a while, an owl swooped in and stole the mouse from the kits and flew off. A nearby warrior sees this and tells the kit, “This is why we be respectful of our food.”
That wouldn’t work well with how cats hunt, not to mention how they teach their kittens how to hunt before it can leave home. Cats bring home live prey to their kittens, and the kittens play with it. Granted, in canon, the cats were playing with a dead piece of mouse, but I still felt it unnecessary to add to the Code.
Lightningnose here with another question. What do you think would happen with your Clans if there was a half-Clan relationship ousted? Whether the cats were discovered together, or X cat gives birth and someone in the Clan goes "woah, that doesn't look like a pure Xclan kit to me!"
Hello, Lightningnose!
This is an excellent question and one I’ve put a lot of thought into creating a process for, for while forbidden love grinds my gears and I’d like to avoid it for the most part, I have enjoyed working out a reasonable method of dealing with it where the culprits are punished but the clans don’t lose as badly. (Because if I was a clan leader I really wouldn’t want to lose a warrior and a potential windfall of kits).
At it’s base, what would happen first is that the Keepers of both clans would get together with another uninvolved clan Keeper (let’s say Mountainclan and Hillclan are involved, and they ask a Marshclan Keeper to come). This is to keep things fair and have a third-party as both potential mediator and a tie-breaker. They’re going to hold a Council of Keepers, and basically go ‘look, you broke our base Code, you’re in trouble, here’s what’s going to happen, will you cooperate?’
Then, if the culprits agree (which is pretty much guaranteed), the two cats are going to be put on ‘probation’. They’re demoted to apprentice level. They are not allowed out of camp for a number of moons that is determined by the Keepers collectively; probably based on how long this has been going on. So let’s say four moons here. Now, if there’s a molly involved who’s had kits, her probation doesn’t begin until her after kits are apprenticed.
Brief Tangent Ahead (BTA)
Excuse this quick little seg about the kits: If mum’s still alive and all is well, her clan has total rights to the kits and the other clan has zero claim. If the mother is dead, and the mother’s clan has another queen who can care for the kits, then the mother’s clan still has total claim over the kits. If the mother dies and the mother’s clan has no other queens who can care for them, the father’s clan gets total rights to the kits.
Additionally, the kits (if there are any) are absolutely not to be harmed or blamed in any way, and while they might be a glaring mark of a broken Code (depending on how ‘different’ they look) every clan regards it as an equal shame to blame or punish kits for their parents’ offenses.So if Hillclan here is ragging out little Rabbitpaw, Deerpaw, and Mousepaw for being fat ‘n fluffy like their Mountainclan daddy, you can bet some other clans are going to jump on their tails about their behavior.
Tangent done.
Now, after being confined to camp for X number of moons (during which they will be addressed as and treated like apprentices and will be doing duties in-camp, like helping the healers keep watch over the elders and kits, cleaning dens, training with other apprentices, teaching kits, etc.) they have a six moon period of being allowed out of camp on patrols and duties. If they successfully complete all of this without any rule-breaking or recalcitrant behavior, they are welcomed back as a full warrior and the clan’s attitude towards them is restored.
Should they ever break another serious rule again, they face potential exile by a Vote of Nine (nine Voting Cats– which depending on the clan will be Keeper, Successor, any healers, leader, potentially elders/warriors).
So that’s the general idea; it was created by the Keepers as a note under the Code of (summarizing here) ‘don’t take mates in another clan’. This probably one of the oldest notes.
Admittedly, each clan has a bit different personal attitude towards this sort of thing. Some will be more pissed than others (Forestclan, Hillclan). ). Some will be most concerned about the kits, and brand it as ‘look what blemish you’ve placed on these poor innocent lives!’ (Marshclan, Islandclan, Mountainclan, Roamingclan, Graveclan). Of course, this can vary over generations and the current mindset towards other clans, if any other rules have been broken, how the culprits were viewed before their affair was discovered, etc.
I hope I answered your question thoroughly enough!