cens-r replied to your post: âi canât even begin to explain how inconvenient it makes my life that...â:
I actually wrote a paper on linguistic differences and similarities between south indian languages and sanskrit-derived languages and that was one thing that really threw me off because some people called marathi and gujarati (for ex) dialects while others say they are separate languages lol. weird
ooh that sounds like a really cool paper!
Iâm more frustrated about the complete lack of interest in distinguishing between accents (minor differences in pronunciation and nothing else) and dialects (which can include an accent but also use of different words, slightly different grammatical structures, but can still be understood by speakers of the standard language/a different dialect) even when the same person may have both in different contexts
(Iâm just defining these terms for the sake of clarity, not because I think you donât already know)
Dialect does melt into language, and India is FULL of really blurry lines in this regard. Itâs not so much an issue of terminology as it is an issue of how youâre going to examine whatâs there. (Marathi and Gujurati, though? What on EARTH?? I can see Gujurati being classed as a dialect of Hindi, maybe, if you had a particularly unifying-minded writer, but Marathi???????? Oh, well, maybe theyâre closer to each other than I realize. I donât speak either, so...)
But at least they MAKE the distinction, even if no one agrees on where to draw the line...