The Fairness Doctrine
The Fairness Doctrine was a controversial policy enacted by the FCC.
As a whole, its purpose was to monitor news in broadcasting through ensuring that public issues were presented from opposing viewpoints. However, many believed that the policy in fact limited free speech and was full of ulterior motives.
 â...âthe fairness doctrine, on its face, violates the First Amendment and contravenes the public interest.ââ
âOnly Connect: A Cultural History of Broadcastingâ 3rd edition, p 323
For a fuller understanding on its opposition along with those who supported the policy, see the following:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZrdLYtLPx0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRZYrFwwN
Ultimately, the Fairness Doctrine was repealed by the FCC in 1987:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-fairness-doctrine-in-one-post/2011/08/23/gIQAN8CXZJ_blog.html
What would happen if the Fairness Doctrine was put in place today?
â The result of a reinstituted fairness doctrine would not be fair at all.â
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/1993/10/em368-why-the-fairness-doctrine-is-anything-but-fair
The FCC claimed that the Fairness Doctrine was instilled in order to bring unbiased, hard news to the forefront. However, what it was intended to do and it what it actually did showed why the policy would not be a positive addition to media especially today. As outlined in the above article, news outlets have increased exponentially with the growth of technology and âit is hard to understand why the federal government must police the airwaves to ensure that differing views are heard.â I believe that every media outlet should have the right to exercise their freedom of speech. However, the Fairness Doctrine has shown that repercussions would be faced if certain broadcasts did not line up with what they deemed to be regulated.















