#caste census

-- Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, Essays on Untouchables and Untouchability

Why did the Hindus suddenly turn to reduce the population of the Untouchables from millions to fractions? The figure of 50 millions had stood on the record from 1911. It had not been questioned by any one. How is it that in 1932 the Hindus made so determined an effort without any regard to the means to challenge the accuracy of this figure? 

The answer is simple. Up to 1932 the Untouchables had no political importance. Although they were outside the pale of Hindu Society which recognises only four classes namely Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Shudras, yet for political purposes they were reckoned as part of the Hindu Society. So that for political purposes such as representation in the Legislature etc., the question of the population of the Untouchables was of no consequence. Up to 1932 the political question was one of division of seats in the Legislature between Hindus and Musalmans only and as there was no question of the seats that came to the lot of the Hindus being partitioned between the Touchables and the Untouchables and as the whole share went to the Touchables they did not care to inquire what the population of the Untouchables was. By 1932 the situation had completely altered. The question of partition was no longer a question between Hindus and Musalmans. The Untouchables had begun to claim that there should not only be a partition between the Hindus and Musalmans but that the share allotted to the Hindus should be further partitioned and the share of the Untouchables given to them to be enjoyed by them exclusively. This claim to separation was recognised and the Untouchables were allowed to be represented by members of their own class at the Indian Round Table Conference. Not only was the separate existence of the Untouchables thus recognised but the Minorities Subcommittee of the Indian Round Table Conference had accepted the principle that under the new Constitution the depressed classes should be given representation in all Legislatures in proportion to their population. It is thus that the population of the Untouchables became a subject of importance. The less the population of the Untouchables the greater the share of the political representation that would go to the Touchable Hindus. This will explain why the Touchables who before 1932 did not care to quarrel over the question of the population of the Untouchables, after 1932 began denying the very existence of such a class as Untouchables.

The ostensible grounds urged by the Hindus before the Lothian Committee for reducing the population of the Untouchables were two. One was that the figures given by the Census Commissioner were for Depressed Classes and not for Untouchables and that Depressed Classes included other classes besides Untouchables. The second ground urged by them was that, the definition of the word should be uniform throughout all India and should be applied in all Provinces in determining the population of the Untouchables. In other words they objected to a local test of untouchability. 

The first contention was absolutely untrue. The term Depressed Classes was used as a synonym for Untouchables and the term Depressed Classes was used instead of the term Untouchables because the latter it was felt, would give offence to the people meant to be included under the term. That, it was used to denote only the Untouchables and it did not include the Aboriginals or the Criminal Tribes was made clear in the debate that took place in the Imperial Legislative Council in 1916 on the Resolution moved by the Honourable Mr. Dadabhoy. The second contention of the caste Hindus was that the test of untouchability should be uniform. The object of putting forth this contention was to reduce the number of Untouchables. It is well known that there are variations in the forms which untouchability assumes in different parts of India. In some parts of India, Untouchables are un-seeables i.e. they cause pollution if they come within the sight of a Touchable Hindu. In some parts Untouchables are unapproachables i.e. they cause pollution if they come within a certain distance of a Touchable Hindu. Of these unapproachables there are two classes. There is a class of unapproachables who cannot come within a certain fixed distance of a Touchable Hindu. 

There is another class of unapproachables who cannot come so near a Hindu as to let his shadow fall upon him. In some parts of India an Untouchable is not an unseeable or unapproachable. It is only his physical contact which causes pollution. In some parts an Untouchable is one who is not allowed to touch water or food. In some parts an Untouchable is one who is not allowed to enter a temple. With these variations it is clear, that if unseeability was taken as the only test of untouchability, then the unapproachables would have to be excluded from the category of Untouchables. If unapproachability was taken as a test, then those whose touch only caused pollution will have to be excluded from the category of Untouchables. If causing pollution by touch be taken as a test, then those whose disability is that they are not allowed to touch water or food or those whose only disability is that they are not allowed to enter the temple, shall have to be excluded. This is what the Hindus wanted to do. By insisting upon uniform test they wanted to eliminate certain classes from the category of Untouchables and thereby reduce the population of the Untouchables. Obviously their point of view was fallacious. Untouchability is an outward expression of the inner repulsion which a Hindu feels towards a certain person. The form which this repulsion takes is comparatively a matter of small moment. The form merely indicates the degree of repulsion. Wherever there is repulsion there is untouchability. This simple truth the Hindus knew. 

OBC empowerment in India remains delayed despite constitutional provisions, with vacancies unfilled and leadership positions largely inaccessible. Creamy layer rules and selective policies block deserving OBC youth from education, jobs, and promotions. Political reluctance and systemic bias prevent true representation in government, judiciary, and top institutions. Urgent reforms like nationwide caste census, inclusive EWS, and scholarship updates are essential for justice. Collective awareness, unity, and advocacy are key to achieving constitutional rights for OBC communities.

To know more: https://obcrights.org/blog/reservation/whos-afraid-of-obc-empowerment-the-truth-behind-policy-delays/

Learn more and join the movement for OBC rights at www.obcrights.org to secure education, jobs, and representation.

New Delhi News: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने सोमवार को एक महत्वपूर्ण आदेश दिया है। शीर्ष अदालत ने साल 2027 की जनगणना में जाति दर्ज करने और सत्यापन की प्रक्रिया को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका (PIL) पर सुनवाई से इनकार कर दिया है। हालांकि, कोर्ट ने केंद्र सरकार और जनगणना आयुक्त को याचिकाकर्ता के सुझावों पर विचार करने का निर्देश दिया है। यह मामला भारत के प्रधान न्यायाधीश (CJI) जस्टिस सूर्यकांत की अध्यक्षता…

New Delhi News: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने सोमवार को एक महत्वपूर्ण आदेश दिया है। शीर्ष अदालत ने साल 2027 की जनगणना में जाति दर्ज करने और सत्यापन की प्रक्रिया को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका (PIL) पर सुनवाई से इनकार कर दिया है। हालांकि, कोर्ट ने केंद्र सरकार और जनगणना आयुक्त को याचिकाकर्ता के सुझावों पर विचार करने का निर्देश दिया है। यह मामला भारत के प्रधान न्यायाधीश (CJI) जस्टिस सूर्यकांत की अध्यक्षता…

India News: कांग्रेस नेता जयराम रमेश ने जनगणना 2027 के लिए जारी नए प्रश्नावली पर सवाल उठाए हैं। उन्होंने कहा कि केंद्र सरकार की अधिसूचना जाति गणना को लेकर उसकी मंशा पर संदेह पैदा करती है। सरकार ने हाउस-लिस्टिंग के लिए 33 सवालों की सूची जारी की है। पहला चरण अप्रैल से सितंबर 2026 तक चलेगा। जयराम रमेश ने सोशल मीडिया पर एक पोस्ट में मोदी सरकार पर निशाना साधा। उन्होंने जाति गणना को लेकर सरकार के…

India News: कांग्रेस नेता जयराम रमेश ने जनगणना 2027 के लिए जारी नए प्रश्नावली पर सवाल उठाए हैं। उन्होंने कहा कि केंद्र सरकार की अधिसूचना जाति गणना को लेकर उसकी मंशा पर संदेह पैदा करती है। सरकार ने हाउस-लिस्टिंग के लिए 33 सवालों की सूची जारी की है। पहला चरण अप्रैल से सितंबर 2026 तक चलेगा। जयराम रमेश ने सोशल मीडिया पर एक पोस्ट में मोदी सरकार पर निशाना साधा। उन्होंने जाति गणना को लेकर सरकार के…

मराठा समाजाला आरक्षण द्यावे ही खूप जुनी मागणी आहे. त्यावर सरकारने गांभीर्याने विचार केला नाही. या मागणीच्या मागील अर्थकारण, समाजकारण आणि शैक्षणिक धोरण या सर्वांचे अपयश लपलेले होते. हे समजून घेण्यात राज्यकर्ते कमी पडले. मराठा आरक्षणासाठी पुन्हा एकदा मोठे आंदोलन मुंबईमध्ये झाले. या आंदोलनाचा शेवट काय होणार..? मागण्या मान्य होतील का, मागण्या आहेत तरी कोणत्या आहेत..?…याच्यावरती त्या अनुषंगाने चर्चा…