#captaincleansweep

Yeah 100% fair I find that too

He’s officially rubbed it in too thick when he claims, “I’m utterly lost without you.”

“You’re utterly up my arse,” Lily scoffs, rounding the next corner on the fifth floor. She swears she just saw a blue scarf dart around this way, but now the Ravenclaw is eluding her. She lets out an exasperated sigh.

“Lily—”

“You need to stop swapping onto my rounds, James. The Prefects are going to riot.”

“Markley didn’t care.”

“But it isn’t just Markley, is it? Last week it was Pru Howe. And Felix Finch before that. And—”

She marches around the next corner, but a sharp tug on her arm skews her momentum. She somehow finds herself swung around, back pressed against a cold stone wall, her boyfriend’s heated body pressed flush against hers.

“I’m utterly lost without you,” he repeats, grinning.

“Shut up,” Lily says. Then she kisses him.

I hope this isn’t rude but I think your logic is a bit flawed.

Sure, you could say it’s unfair to compare Daenerys wanting to reclaim and rule a place she didn’t grow to the Starks wanting to reclaim and rule what they did grow up in.

The thing is that it’s not like this is generations of generations of Targaryens being in exile, she was conceived in Kingslanding and would have been born and raised in there had Roberts Rebellion not have happened. Her family reigned there for literally three hundred years. Her mother and father lived and ruled there. Had Aerys not sent Rhaella and Viserys to Dragonstone, they all would have most likely been slaughtered alongside Elia, Rhaenys and Aegon. Daenerys story is very much about home, ever since she was old enough to comprehend, her brother was telling her of how they would take back their home. Hell, Viserys sold her like a horse and told her he’d allow 40,000 men rape her and their horses too if it got him his army, so they could go home.

“...reclaim the throne of a country they've never been to”

Daenerys was born in Westeros, to say that she’s never been to the ‘country’ is incorrect. Sure she was a baby, an infant, but it’s still her place of birth and the place where her family had reigned for three whole centuries prior.

“...that an ancestor they never met conquered and who's line of descendants brought as much evil as they did good?”

I’m not sure what this has to do with anything or than prove my point that there is a double standard when it comes to Daenerys and the Starks even further.

“....that an ancestor they never met conquered...”

The exact same thing could be said about the Starks. The First Men ‘conquered’ the North, and the Stark children have never met them.

“...and who's line of descendants brought as much evil as they did good?”

Daenerys's father being a terrible and evil King doesn't erase the other terrible Kings of winter and horrible lords of Winterfell did that existed before. So I ask, why should Daenerys be punished for the crimes and bad deeds that those before her committed, but the Stark children aren’t? Why shouldn’t you be asking the same question about the Starks when they want to reclaim their home? Every system brings “good” and “bad” to the table. The Starks are loved by the North, but that doesn’t mean they don’t profit off of the poor / peasants labor. Also, this doesn’t erase the fact that a poor / horrible Stark ruler could still emerge in the future. The system is inherently flawed, that’s the problem with hereditary monarchy in general.

morgan stark: said shit. she's a little kid. she shouldn't cuss. that's bad. also she told tony "define lunch or be disintegrated" which meant that she was gonna KILL him and also she stole the rescue helmet out of tony's workshop so she's rude and a thief and threatened to kill her dad, AND she appears to love her dad, who is a known war criminal,

doc palmer: I literally remember nothing from that movie but uhh she didn't trust stephen right away when he astral projected to talk to her. argued with him about whether they were going to call it the strange-palmer or palmer-strange technique which is rude, the polite thing to do would be to let him put his name first

monica rambeau: got ketchup on carol's leather jacket, which is thoughtless and disrespectful,

oh.....good take but i still argue that Fjord is Sokka: underrated intelligence and charisma, intentionally uses humor to deflate tension and keep from talking about himself, is low-key keeping the whole group together, feels Responsible whenever something bad happens to someone because he thinks he should have protected them even if objectively it was not on him....

tbh I don’t even feel like endgame is a team up movie, the avengers barely communicate like a team, they don’t even fight like the Titan team in IW, where there’s a team tactic and everyone gets to use their own power to complement each other and get shit done, endgame is a movie of different individuals, it’s not what a team up movie is supposed to be 😭like I feel a stronger sense of team with the Titan team in IW, Revengers in Ragnarok, Guardians and the 2012 Avengers movie, like they break the Avengers up in civil war but they never actually allow them to talk.. another reason they use the 5 year gap is to simply let time pass so Tony will get over it himself, like that’s so shitty but it’s what the director commentary is basically saying