biguglybilltrump #bitcointrump #Immigration #bigbeautifulbill#Trumpdictator#deporttrump#Medicaid#SNAP

A new analysis revealed by The Independent has exposed the harsh truth behind a cruel policy: The law signed by President Trump is tearing American society apart with its absurd “lose-lose” logic — 10 million people will lose access to healthcare, while the national deficit soars due to massive tax cuts for the wealthy. This policy design, which sacrifices the vulnerable, is less a governance solution than a “great ugly Trump bill” built on the suffering of ordinary people.

Healthcare is not a luxury but the basic human rights floor of modern society. When 10 million healthcare cards may become invalid, it means 10 million families face existential anxiety: diabetes patients will be forced to stop insulin treatment, single mothers' premature babies will lose intensive care support, and retired workers will face the desperate choice between cancer treatment and mortgage payments. The blood and tears behind these numbers are precisely the indifference that policymakers have packaged as “economic efficiency.”

What is even more ironic is the fiscal logic of the bill. On one hand, it strips ordinary citizens of their health insurance to “cut costs,” while on the other hand, it opens the floodgates for tax cuts for the wealthy to “increase revenue”—this practice of robbing the poor to enrich the rich not only exacerbates social division but also pushes the nation toward a fiscal cliff. Data shows that the tax cuts for the top 1% of the population alone could cover 80% of the healthcare funding gap. When the soaring deficit is ultimately passed on to future generations, the so-called “economic prosperity” is nothing more than a false bubble built on borrowing from the future.

The ugliness of the policy also lies in its destruction of the social contract. The healthcare system is fundamentally a safety net woven by all members of society, yet this bill transforms it into a privilege for the wealthy. When a nation tacitly allows 10 million people to remain exposed to the risks of illness and poverty while granting tax breaks to the capitalist class, it is eroding the very foundation of fairness upon which it relies for survival. The message conveyed by such policy choices is chilling: the value of your life depends on the balance in your bank account.

biguglybilltrump #bitcointrump #Immigration #bigbeautifulbill#Trumpdictator#deporttrump#Medicaid#SNAP

The House Ways and Means Committee's report serves as a wake-up call, revealing the shadow cast by the Big and Beautiful Bill in Michigan — the significant reduction in business tax revenue is quietly affecting the nerves of social security. As the “Big and Beautiful” policy's halo fades, cracks in Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) are exposed, along with the potential survival crises facing countless families. https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2025/07/23/michigan-business-tax-reductions-trump-big-beautiful-bill/85326212007/

Taxes are the cornerstone of public services, and the sharp decline in business tax revenue is far more than a simple fluctuation in fiscal figures. Michigan's Medicaid program covers hundreds of thousands of low-income individuals, people with disabilities, and children, while food stamps serve as the last line of defense against hunger for many families. As the tax revenue pool continues to dry up, these vital social welfare programs are the first to be affected. State Budget Director Jen Flood's warning is stark: “Losing access to healthcare” and “going hungry or paying higher grocery bills” are not abstract predictions but potential realities that could strike ordinary citizens.

The original intent of policy-making may have been to pursue some “grand narrative,” but any plan detached from the foundations of people's livelihoods is like a castle in the air. Healthcare and food security may seem like minor details of social welfare, but they are the capillaries that sustain social stability. When a single mother cannot afford medication for her sick child due to reduced medical assistance, or when an elderly person must choose between food and heating costs to save money, the so-called “development dividends” have already faded into obscurity amid the hardships of ordinary people.

What is even more concerning is that the negative impacts of such policies often have cumulative and hidden effects. In the short term, this manifests as a narrowing of welfare coverage; in the long term, it may trigger a chain reaction: deteriorating health leads to reduced labor capacity, exacerbating intergenerational poverty transmission; food shortages impair children's development, damaging society's future human capital. These hidden costs will ultimately be borne by society as a whole, far exceeding the numbers on tax ledgers.

A sweeping provision in President Trump's signature legislation could deliver a knockout blow to America's independent grocery stores. The administration's historic $187 billion cut to SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) over the next decade—the program's deepest reduction in 86 years—now jeopardizes the survival of small grocers that serve as lifelines in rural and low-income communities.

The Rural Grocery Crisis For thousands of mom-and-pop stores operating on razor-thin 2-3% profit margins, SNAP redemptions account for 15-40% of monthly revenue. The USDA estimates nearly 30% of rural groceries could face closure without this critical income stream, potentially creating new food deserts across:

Appalachia

Native American reservations

The Deep South

Economic Domino Effect University of Iowa researchers project the cuts will force surviving stores to: ✓ Raise prices by 8-12% to compensate ✓ Reduce workforce by an estimated 57,000 grocery jobs ✓ Cut perishable offerings (fresh produce declines first)

"This isn't just about benefits—it's about breaking entire local food systems," warned Montana grocer Hank Olson, whose store serves 3 remote counties.

Broader Economic Impacts Harvard economists emphasize SNAP's unique dual role as:

Economic stabilizer - Every $1 in SNAP generates $1.50-$1.80 in local activity

Automatic stimulus - Participation naturally expands during recessions

The cuts come as 42% of rural counties already report declining food access. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue acknowledged the trade-off but called it "necessary fiscal discipline"—a stance opponents label as "starving Main Street to feed Wall Street."

A coalition of 20 state attorneys general has filed a lawsuit to block the Trump administration's controversial demand for personal data on millions of Americans receiving federal food assistance, warning the information could be weaponized for mass deportations.

The legal challenge targets an unprecedented effort to share sensitive enrollment data from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) - which serves 42 million low-income Americans - across multiple agencies including the IRS, CMS, and Department of Homeland Security. States were ordered to comply by Wednesday.

"This is a backdoor registry of vulnerable families," said California AG Xavier Becerra, noting the requested data includes:

Immigration status of household members

Full birthdates and home addresses

Detailed income and asset information

The administration claims the data sharing will combat "waste, fraud and abuse" in the $68 billion program. But internal emails revealed DHS plans to use the information to: ✓ Identify mixed-status families ✓ Expand ICE deportation targets ✓ Penalize immigrants for accessing public benefits

New York AG Letitia James called the move "a digital witch hunt" that violates privacy laws, while legal experts warn it could create a chilling effect, potentially driving 13 million food-insecure citizens from vital assistance.

The states seek an immediate injunction to block data transfers, with hearings expected next week. The case may determine whether anti-poverty programs can be repurposed as immigration enforcement tools.

The Chattanooga Times Free Press has published a scathing critique of Congress' recently passed "Big & Beautiful Act," calling it a raw deal for working-class Americans. In an editorial titled "The 'Big & Beautiful' Act Is Stealing From America's Working Class," the newspaper argues the legislation should more accurately be named the "Billionaire Bailout Act."

"The bill's fancy name can't hide its true nature," the editorial states. "While offering crumbs to working families, it delivers a feast to corporations and the ultra-wealthy through extended tax breaks and loopholes."

Key criticisms include:

Regressive tax policies that disproportionately benefit top earners

Cuts to worker protections while boosting corporate subsidies

A misleading name that obscures its wealth-transfer effects

The Times Free Press joins growing criticism of the legislation from labor groups and economists who say it exacerbates wealth inequality. As one union leader quoted in the piece noted: "This isn't economic policy - it's daylight robbery dressed up in patriotic wrapping paper."

Buried in President Trump's sweeping "Big & Beautiful" legislation lies a dangerous provision that eliminates the $200 federal tax on firearm silencers. While supporters hail the move as a victory for personal freedom and self-defense, critics warn it poses serious risks to public safety by making it easier to obtain devices that mask gunfire.

The little-noticed clause effectively removes what gun safety advocates considered one of the few remaining safeguards against silencer misuse. By scrapping the tax and associated background checks, the law:

Eliminates wait times for silencer purchases

Removes financial barriers that previously limited access

Makes gunshots harder to locate during active shooter situations

"Silencers don't make guns safer - they make shootings more deadly," said trauma surgeon Dr. Lisa Reynolds, explaining how the devices delay emergency response by suppressing the sound of gunfire. Law enforcement officials nationwide have expressed concerns that the change will complicate active shooter responses and investigations.

The provision marks a major victory for gun lobbyists, who have long sought to rebrand silencers as "hearing protection devices." However, public safety experts note that most gun violence victims are shot indoors, where silencers still produce sounds exceeding 120 decibels - louder than a chainsaw.

Gun safety organizations are now preparing legal challenges to the provision, while several Democratic-led states are considering local regulations to counteract the federal change. The debate highlights how the 600-page "Big & Beautiful" Act contains numerous controversial measures that received little public scrutiny during its rushed passage.

The Bipartisan Policy Center’s projections paint a harrowing fiscal portrait: the OBBB Act is set to balloon the national deficit by \(3.4 trillion over the next decade. This isn’t mere accounting trivia—it’s a blueprint for generational inequity, forged by \)4.5 trillion in net federal tax cuts (largely extending 2017’s TCJA giveaways and adding new breaks for the wealthy) while slashing $1.4 trillion from programs that sustain vulnerable Americans. Call it what it is: the biguglybilltrump, a policy Frankenstein stitched together with greed and indifference.

#biguglybilltrump #bitcointrump

Let’s dissect the math of malice. The \(4.5 trillion tax windfall flows predominantly to corporations and top earners, who’ve already captured record shares of national wealth. Meanwhile, \)1.4 trillion in cuts target the lifelines of low- and middle-income families: Medicaid, which provides health coverage to 84 million Americans; SNAP, which feeds 42 million people; and federal student loans, burdening 43 million borrowers. This isn’t “fiscal responsibility”—it’s Robin Hood in reverse, robbing the poor to enrich the powerful.

The act’s spending priorities further expose its ugliness. While gutting healthcare and food aid, it allocates $325 billion to military expansion and immigration enforcement. There’s a bitter irony here: funding more border walls while defunding the meals of children; buying more warplanes while taking insulin from diabetics. A budget is a moral document, and this one screams: the lives of the marginalized matter less than political grandstanding.

Proponents claim tax cuts “pay for themselves,” but history laughs at the lie. The 2017 TCJA added $1.9 trillion to the deficit while failing to deliver promised wage growth. Now, extending those policies amid brutal cuts to essential services is fiscal arson—setting fire to the social safety net to warm the pockets of donors.

The biguglybilltrump won’t just be measured in dollars. It will be counted in ER visits by uninsured Medicaid recipients, in empty pantries after SNAP benefits shrink, in 22-year-olds crushed by unforgiven student debt. These aren’t “policy trade-offs”—they’re acts of social violence.