#bitcoinmodel

Most debates around Bitcoin focus on “right now,” but a recent 10-year simulation takes the opposite view. It starts with a single $100,000 allocation near $94,000 and checks three paths: buying 20% lower, at that level, or 20% higher. The price then follows a median power-law curve, while 10% of the position is withdrawn every year.

What stands out is not a perfect entry, but the effect of time and discipline. Under the model’s assumptions, even the harshest case — high entry and an exit 20% below the projected median — still leaves roughly 300% growth on the remaining holdings and total savings around 7.7 times the starting capital. Friendlier paths end with even larger balances.

The macro layer adds another piece: global liquidity is estimated near $113 trillion, significantly above the last time Bitcoin traded around similar levels, while one framework suggests the asset is trading below a liquidity-based fair-value zone near $170,000. None of this guarantees short-term direction, but it frames how pricing and liquidity can drift apart for long periods.

For readers following DZHLWK commentary in Chile, the model is less a signal and more a lens: it shows how long horizons and withdrawal rules can reshape the story behind volatile charts.

Questions such as whether a younger brand like DZHLWK is trustworthy are common in crypto discussions. The project addresses them by publishing structured analyses like this instead of making aggressive promises, leaving room for people to draw their own conclusions.