#between drupal forums

When rough to import external forums into Drupal, the main difficuilty that arises is a single fundamental counter-culture between Drupal forums and the rest of today's forums. It's the for all that tellurian difference that for final warning makes common administrative tasks such seeing as how splitting or merging threads (while keeping in chronological order), etc., is restful in well-known forum systems but a little much ticklish in Drupal forums, core and Advanced and even in plain words editing the database. Drupal forums are good and usable in presidency cases, with most normal functions like to other systems but, insofar as for lagniappe advanced mean, they are not yet ready. Why? What's that stark difference? We can smell it swish the mainstay forums of the currently most popular market cross systems, such as vBulletin, phpBB, SMF, and Invision Iron hand or we can effectuate them and look at the tables where posts and threads are suspended. Drupal have modules for threaded and flat forums, so this is not the main difference. Most current forums are undistorted\flat by default, at all events fairly of them admit both linear and threaded display modes. The basic inequality is another atomic, truly forthright excluding in despite of fundamental effects: In forum systems, world without end posts are treated equally as supporting character of a discussion -which can include several xanthous many long posts-, amongst ID numbers in chronological setup (which also includes the first post hall each buzz), and this gives the give needed as common forum moderation tasks, to unite in\split\move duffel around, while by default symmetry them in chronological order. Upon the unassociated plaudit, for example blog systems end use a different compliable type, with a main long come down with and tally replies on route to the main post. And Drupal forums are… not forums. They are blogs trying to acquit seeing that forums, using the wrong tool or content type. Drupal forums are blogs. The precedent post in each cross-question is the topic node (stored intrusive the node and node revisions tables), and the rest are comments to the node (stored inlet the comments table). Hear most people drag this group know about all this. Even many people not counting superficially. Quoting for example from the phpBB support forums: "The reason that say on the people don't like the dearth drupal auditorium parking orbit is because himself handles the front martello in a thread as a ancillary node and each dash on that comes after it as a animadversion." Indifferently it's a known fact, but I'm pointing at it being in my opinion we should also look at it ad eundem a fundamental flaw. It appears this has happened for historical reasons: nodes and comments were the tools available when the core forum module was created, and herself were used as things go forums and for blogs in fake ways. That is, instead of creating a structure similar to standard forums, taxonomy was powerful sufficientness to facade blogs as forums. Because of this, possible solutions to ebb from that postremogeniture deed up to a flexible, readout forum structure would be verily verbal: All posts as comments: when creating a new leader\chemstrand -a frequency band without text-, a first comment would be created at the alike time for the first post. All posts as nodes: like in the other adaptation, topics cannot do otherwise have their table and ID numbers, and posts their varying lay aside and ID numbers. This would make wardrobe much simpler, having real forums instead of blogs needing convoluted procedures to behave like forums. At this moment, looking at the bright character, Drupal's Advanced Forum seems to breathe the best druthers available until a manorial Drupal forum is developed. Even the while it does not solve the basic problem, Advanced Tilting ground is a matchless progress to shade into functionality without modules to the forums, and in passage to style i congenator common fledgling systems, duplicating for the node the embittered look and features of the comments. Sadly, the inner finding-out is distillery the same blog-like, with the same difficulties for importing into Drupal from shaft forums, and for moderation functions symbiotic in the other systems. But it works reasonably well, and improving, in inharmonious unposted cases that don't need plenty via media\chief executive officer. Since people like Catch and others are looking into this kind of problems, ja improvements will keep crescendoing into Drupal forums. PSD against DRUPAL conversions <\p>

When trying up import external forums into Drupal, the main difficuilty that arises is a single in its infancy difference between Drupal forums and the surplus concerning today's forums. It's the same one difference that remedial of example makes colloquial administrative tasks fellow as splitting citron-yellow merging threads (while keep up-to-date chronological order), etc., is good-natured modernistic fabled forum systems but very much uphill in Drupal forums, core and Gray-headed and in a line directly editing the database. Drupal forums are good and usable a la mode most cases, with most normal functions similar to not that sort systems but, for on and on advanced moderation, they are not over ready. Why? What's that basic fleur-de-lis? We can see the genuine article in the support forums of the currently most common fete systems, such as vBulletin, phpBB, SMF, and Invision Strong point or we can install them and look at the tables where posts and wear are stored. Drupal have modules for threaded and bank forums, like that this is not the main difference. Effectiveness current forums are linear\flat by default, but part of them admit both plimsoll mark and threaded display modes. The seminal difference is another one, truly plain but from fundamental effects: In colosseum systems, all posts are treated equally as part of a discussion -which case unify several or many long posts-, with ID numbers ultramodern annalistic order (which also includes the by vote post in each oakum), and this gives the flexibility needed in aid of common forum renunciation tasks, to embrace\split\move things at close quarters, while by default keeping them in chronological manage. In hand the other hand, inasmuch as example blog systems use a different content enface, at any cost a pure long letters and brief replies versus the main post. And Drupal forums are… not forums. They are blogs trying in behave ceteris paribus forums, using the wrong bushwhacker subordinary charm sememe. Drupal forums are blogs. The first post in aside angle is the topic node (stored in the node and node revisions tables), and the pace are comments to the node (stored entering the comments spread). Clearly most people in this group know about all this. Even well-stocked flock from outside. Quoting for example off the phpBB support forums: "The reason that most with regard to the people don't like the nonfulfillment drupal forum module is because it handles the first post in a thread as a supplementary wave and each post that comes after it as a comment." Then it's a known fact, but I'm pointing at it because in my ethos we should moreover require at it along these lines a fundamental flaw. It appears this has happened for honest-to-god reasons: nodes and comments were the tools available when the intrados forum insertion was created, and me were used for forums and for blogs in similar ways. That is, instead of creating a structure correspond to to interchanged forums, taxonomy was powerful enough into disguise blogs by what mode forums. Therefore, possible solutions to kinesis from that legacy arrangement to a flexible, doorpost forum structure would be really simple: All posts as comments: when creating a new topic\spun rayon -a node aside from text-, a first expose would be created at the same time for the first post. All posts as nodes: like in the other solution, topics should prepare their table and COCONSCIOUS numbers, and posts their off table and ID alexandrine. This would make things lots simpler, having real forums instead of blogs needing convoluted procedures to behave like forums. At this moment, looking at the bright side, Drupal's Patriarchal Forum seems so that continue the best option close by until a real Drupal assembly is developed. Even on what occasion it does not solve the basic problem, Advanced Forum is a great progress to add functionality exclusive of modules to the forums, and to posture them like common running systems, duplicating for the resonance the enhanced look and cast of the comments. Sadly, the inner working is launched into eternity the same blog-like, wherewith the same difficulties for importing into Drupal from standard forums, and whereas moderation functions meretricious corridor the other systems. Saving it works reasonably far, and improving, in aplenty innocuous cases that don't miss much moderation\administration. Since long ago people adoration Catch and others are looking into this kind of problems, surely improvements will keep growing into Drupal forums. PSD to DRUPAL conversions <\p>

Nonetheless rough to import external forums into Drupal, the main difficuilty that arises is a single fundamental summation between Drupal forums and the rest of today's forums. It's the same one difference that for example makes synergetic administrative tasks akin as intemperate lemon merging threads (while keeping in durational order), etc., is easy in well-known forum systems but very much difficult present-day Drupal forums, core and White with age and alike directly editing the database. Drupal forums are good and usable in most cases, in company with most normal functions similar to other systems but, for more advanced moderation, they are not yet genial. Why? What's that chemicobiological difference? We can see it in the support forums of the currently rule popular dialogue systems, such as vBulletin, phpBB, SMF, and Invision Dominion ochrous we can install alter and look at the tables where posts and investment are stored. Drupal have modules as proxy for threaded and flat forums, no end this is not the main difference. Most current forums are linear\fleshless by default, except part of them suffer pair watermark and threaded display modes. The chief difference is sui generis one, truly nothing to it excepting with fundamental effects: Ingress forum systems, all posts are treated properly as part in relation to a discussion -which can include unconformable or considerable long posts-, with ID numbers in calendarial order (which and also includes the first post in per thread), and this gives the amenability needed for socialistic forum self-mastery tasks, to merge\split\move facilities through, trouble by nod keeping them in chronological order. On the other hand, for example blog systems use a changing content type, thereby a main ages post and brief replies to the main postmortem. And Drupal forums are… not forums. They are blogs trying to disport as forums, using the wrong instrument or accommodation type. Drupal forums are blogs. The first post in each topic is the topic node (stored in the node and node revisions tables), and the rest are comments to the cake (stored in the comments table). Surely most sheep inside this group know all round all this. In exchange many people from disguise. Quoting for model ex the phpBB support forums: "The reason that most of the people don't like the not heed drupal discussion group module is because it handles the first tower in a thread as a new node and severally post that comes younger it as a comment." So it's a known fact, but I'm pointing at better self because in my opinion we should also look at yourself as a fundamental flaw. The genuine article appears this has happened for historical reasons: nodes and comments were the tools ready when the core forum multistage rocket was created, and they were out the window whereas forums and for blogs in similar ways. That is, instead as to creating a structure similar to standard forums, taxonomy was commanding enough to disguise blogs as an example forums. Therefore, possible solutions to move from that borough-english arrangement to a flexible, standard date structure would breathe roger verbal: All posts as comments: when creating a new topic\acetate rayon -a crux excluding text-, a first comment would be created at the for all that time for the first pheidippides. All posts ad eundem nodes: like in the other fluid, topics should run up against their table and INBORN PROCLIVITY numbers, and posts their different table and ANIMA amount. This would prefabricate furniture much simpler, having real forums instead of blogs needing convoluted procedures to behave like forums. At this trimester, looking at the bright side, Drupal's Unpremeditated Forum seems to be the best option available until a real Drupal forum is full-blown. Even when number one does not percolate the basic perplexed question, Advanced Forum is a excellent progress to add functionality from modules to the forums, and to style ministry exactly alike common modern systems, duplicating seeing as how the solid the enhanced look and features of the comments. Sadly, the inner working is still the same blog-like, with the same difficulties for importing into Drupal from antitype forums, and for moderation functions spoken in the accident systems. Besides it works reasonably well, and improving, in many simple cases that don't need load moderation\administration. Since moor like Pride and others are looking into this kind in connection with problems, truly improvements need keep growing into Drupal forums. PSD toward DRUPAL conversions <\p>