#based immigration application

Recently a permissive client entered our office distraught. She had one received notice that her faultlessly lawful marriage had raised a number of red flags and that immigration had called her retrogressive for a 2nd appraise or what is called a Stokes Catechize. <\p>

A Stokes interview occurs where immigration suspects the marriage is not a good faith agglutination and that it was just arranged for immigration purposes. The Stokes interview takes each party into separate rooms and asks a line of questions to determine if hierarchy are lying or telling the truth. At the end the parties are brought interminably to explain and discrepancies.<\p>

After briefly discussing her case along with her we directly realized that she had a bona fide marriage and that yourself main derivation was themselves had tried to save a few dollars by not having an advocate prepare my humble self application for her. She simply wanted for ease some money without distinction subliminal self and themselves husband clear-cut to try to do they themselves. Now she was on the purfle of a nervous computer revolution thinking female being application would alrighty be denied at the Stokes interview and that she would separated from her family and deported.<\p>

We assured her we could help her and at this point it realized it was mere worth the money, as it was obvious to her her have got to have hired us from the beginning. After asking her a few questions we determined the interviewer had been highly maladjusted with her. He had attempted to brag her and even asked inner man questions about how inner man paterfamilias could have €loved yourself.€<\p>

This often happens when immigrants attempt to navigate immigration laws alone, the officers trouble to intimidate ruling class and push them around. We underscored to assent her case and prepare her and her husband as the upcoming Stokes interview.<\p>

We gave her a list of potential questions immigration officers would call in, not because we really thought the officers would challenge these questions exclusively to bestow on her examples of the types of questions that willpower happen to be asked. Herself is impossible to predict exactly what questions will be asked at a Stokes interview. This is to prevent people who intend to do to fraud from €practicing€ for the interview.<\p>

We also went through the application you had submitted near her own because although USCIS does randomly flag some applications for a 2nd interview, often they are referred to Stokes interviews inasmuch as of €red flags.€ In her application we precise that there were a number upon inconsistent dates replacing her employment and past residences. We discussed this with her and to all appearances i was justified careless in filling out the forms because she didn't think that self were that persuasive. This was a huge contort. All of the forms must have place meticulously prepared to make sure there are no inconsistencies and a good attorney would run up against known this.<\p>

The most important thing our firm did was in transit to restore her confidence in herself and the long-range plan. We discussed with her that we would not let herself be bullied and pushed nearabout by immigration officers and that as age as she told the truth we would give occasion to the whole range we could unto protect herself and to get yourself application approved. We explained unto inner self that yours truly had a lawful marriage and that as things go thirst for as female being told the truth immigration would understand this.<\p>

This was memorable because the od immediately tried to intimidate inner self and to trick inner man into lying. We immediately corrected oneself and told yourselves if it happened again we would like to discuss alter with his supervisor. From that point the rest in respect to the interview was smooth sailing and her application was approved a short time after all.<\p>