**When the Human Eye Disappears: The Silent Threat to AI’s Self‑Improvement Cycle** AI systems that power document review, code analysis, and early‑stage research depend on continuous human evaluation to catch subtle errors and inject nuanced judgment. Yet, as venture capital pours billions into autonomous self‑improvement, the industry is quietly cutting the very reviewers who keep models honest, raising a systemic risk that could stall or even reverse recent gains. ### Key Takeaways - **Human reviewers are the last line of defense** for AI‑generated outputs in high‑stakes domains such as legal contracts, software quality assurance, and scientific literature synthesis. - **Funding trends favor automation over evaluation**, leading startups to downsize or eliminate dedicated evaluation teams. - **The loss of nuanced feedback accelerates model drift**, increasing the likelihood of undetected errors and biased outputs. - **Talent pipelines are narrowing** as new‑grad hiring for evaluation roles declines, creating a skills gap that may be hard to remediate later. - **Long‑term AI safety hinges on maintaining a robust human‑in‑the‑loop** process; without it, “self‑improving” systems risk reinforcing hidden flaws. Read Full Article: [Read Full Article](https://news.ababil360.com/ai-replaces-human-evaluation-the-hidden-risk-no-one-is-modeling/) #AIEvaluation #HumanInTheLoop #ModelSafety #AIResearch #AutomationRisk #VentureCapital #TechTalent #EthicalAI #MachineLearning #newsababil360