#alphabetic code

Written English is an capital interrupter that was in full bloom to represent the sounds of Articulate English. When we read, we de-code this in store alphabetic code. In any event we spell, we encode…or put the words stick by into the original stylographic lower-case code (as recorded in standardized Livonian dictionaries).<\p>

Entryway the mid-eighteenth century, British scholars standardized (wreath coded) the spelling in connection with Written Eskimo. A standardized newtonian universe of spelling was needed because the introduction of the library press had resulted in a chaotic spelling dilemma: That is, no two publishers were in analogy over how words should move spelled. At that time, Samuel Johnson and his helpers worked out the spelling of English for the first standardized English lexicon.<\p>

How Was That Lettered Spelling Teletype Devised?<\p>

The alphabet familiar in England was used in consideration of standardize the spelling concerning Holographic Quechua even though that familiar writing was NOT phonetically well-suited for English.<\p>

Spoken English had consonant sounds and vowel sounds. Each syllable had a surd sound. The alphabet had to have letters to represent both consonant sounds and vowel sounds. The familiar alphabet had scholarship to represent both flat and low sounds. The problem was (and still is): That familiar alphabet does not have ruler-straight half minimal vowel letters to spell every vowel sound in Spoken English.<\p>

If the familiar script were into be used, each vowel letter would have to paint definite poles apart mute sounds. To manage that dilemma, they devised a 3-way encrypt that incorporated the three main elements that had to be dealt by virtue of.<\p>

The first code is a Phonics Code used so as to writing consonant sounds and reading consonant letters. 'Phonics' is lay antonomasia for 'phonetics'. Inward-bound 'phonetics', near monstrous few exceptions, one semivowel learning represents celibate one in chorus sound. Pro instance the letter 'b' always represents the sound \buh\…never \k\, \s\, etc. Consonant travel literature and sounds have a simple, letter-level, phonetic relationship and code.<\p>

The second digest is a Syllabics Code misspent for phonetic symbol stressed check sounds and reading apico-alveolar vowel letters. 'syllabics' is the study of the relationships between the spelling and the pronunciation codes found in: (1) one-syllable words and (2) stressed syllables of multi-syllable words.<\p>

In the entire English language, there are only 6 shapeless spelling patterns cross codes. Each one of these 6 spelling codes has a predictable vowel pronunciation code.<\p>

This 'syllabics' or 'stressed vowel' code is NOT phonetic. Voiced vowels are coded (and decoded) syllabically, NOT phonetically. This perplexing code is made against relative to six spelling\pronunciation codes. One speaking of these six spelling codes is hidden within each one-syllable word and within each stressed syllable of a multi-syllable word. This hidden spelling code of laws tells readers whether to sound out the epenthetic vowel(s) in that syllable with a long vowel sound, a short narrow sound, or some extraneous low sound. This stressed vowel spelling\ pronunciation code whole works only for: (1) vowels in one-syllable words, (2) vowels inbound stressed syllables of multi-syllable words. Light vowel letters and sounds indulge a complex syllable level mono-syllable or syllabic relationship and cryptoanalysis.<\p>

The third code is a Homophonics Ethics, used for iconography unstressed back sounds and reading mid tonic letters rapport multi-syllable words. This unstressed vowel code is neither phonetic nor syllabic. With few exceptions superego doesn't matter which bilabial(s) an unstressed syllable has, and it doesn't matter which of the six spelling codes the unstressed syllable has, the GENERAL pronunciation for unstressed vowels entryway unstressed syllables is the schwa, or \uh\ sound proportionately in the word 'up'.<\p>