#afr

If you did not form your conclusions using textual or contextual evidence, then you must have gotten them somewhere else (be it from the fandom or your own personal biases).

So, of course, when you have an interpretation of a marginalized character that cannot be substantiated with evidence & just so happens to align with historical and popular biases against the marginalized character's identity, I am going to think your interpretations have very little to do with the source material & the character themselve and much more to do with your own personal biases and/or the biases of the fandom.

afr is based. please read it now

first you've got the dice rolling stuff:

those alternating dark gray and light gray boxes, the vertical line between the numbers and the effect, both straight out of a DnD book. they do double work of clearly showing what to do but also evoking that DnD templating that's unique to RPGs

second are the choose your story cards, of which there are tons, and the flavor words to name the abilities:

I've gotta imagine that in playing this it goes something like "I cast You See a Guard Approach. No response? Then I distract the guard." Like just playing Magic and conveying what you do with these cards is going to sound kind of like playing DnD

even just the creatures with only one ability, you're going to get like "When Black Dragon enters the battlefield it uses Acid Breath on Bruenor Battlehammer." I just can't get over how much limited is going to sound like a weird sort of DnD one-shot