In which I just babble more than usual regarding this from Fate Anon:
OK. So all of a sudden, after many,many questions have begun to arise about Cait's 'engagement' we are supposed to buy Sam seen dating someone in Glasgow. During the last 4 years, in between his other 'long distance r/ships' he has never spotted with a gf but now he has been. In the 2,3,4,20 years that Cait has been supposedly dating (SECURITY GUARD)no one has reported seeing them out shopping or anything that looks like they're a couple, but now they have been. 4mths of nothing & (3RD PAGE FROM THE LEFT)maybe back? Just fate
(names changed by me to protect the overly sensitive feelings of whomever, why yes I AM rolling my eyes, how’d ya guess?)
and these two from @bdell1
What do you think the chances are that the engagement is just a sham to temper the SM chatter for a while? If you think that is possible, what comes next - a walk back, a Lionsgate merger with Amazon, an announced project for Cait? Something else? Do you think as I do that the S video walking through the water with the comment “Here’s to making waves in 2018”
Im starting to believe the engagement announcement might have been one of those acts of rebellion we see periodically. Sam goes to Ireland in Dec. Then Cait goes to Australia and oops! We have a leak. Sam on a beach “Here’s to making waves in 2018.” Then a GG blurb without acknowledging who the fiancé is.... Can’t necessarily walk back an engagement, but you can put a small dent in SM by shutting down a small but vocal minority. Possible?
I really didn’t unpack these a lot in the above, but, I am planning on doing a few more audios today and tomorrow that might also address some of this stuff.
