I recently saw a heavy criticism of The Beach saying "it's the single least realistic portrayal of teenagers on television: spoiled, rich kids don't actively shun Zuko for having a disfiguring scar on his face, no one tries to start shit with Azula over the volleyball game, teenagers referring to themselves as teenagers, a teen boy tells people not to make a mess, a bunch of 14-16 year-olds sit in a circle and psychoanalyze each other, everything else about the campfire scene." Your thoughts?
:â) that someone looks at the Beach and dismisses it for being âunrealisticâ by whatever their cultural standards are is probably enough of a sign of the irrelevance of said personâs opinion. I mean, obviously theyâre free to think what they will, but...
Fire Nation society is not American society. Iâm going blind here, maybe this person isnât American at all, but somehow I mostly see such kinds of narrow-minded criticism from first-worlders who are seldom exposed to lifestyles outside their particular, contemporary bubble of experiences.Â
Now then, letâs get into the actual debate: Fire Nation society values violence quite a lot. Fire Nation society is full of people who saw Zukoâs literal Agni Kai burning scene, and didnât look away: the only character who does is Iroh, a very obvious hint by the writers that Iroh has discarded the cruel moral values the rest of the Fire Nation upholds.
With this in mind, a boy with a scarred face might earn all sorts of âewsâ from our societies, damn right. From Fire Nation society, though? If even watching how the burn is inflicted didnât bother most of them, why would the result be a problem? If anything, I wouldnât be surprised if people with burn scars are even seen more attractive because it implies they were caught in violent scuffles with fire and still survived? Of course, the argument might go that Zukoâs burn is meant to be a mark of shame... but itâs a mark of shame for PRINCE Zuko. For that mysterious boy with the emo haircut in Ember Island, whose real identity is a mystery? It is shown, instead, to result in this reaction:
Now then, we could say that this is meant to be a jab by the creators and writers at Zukoâs hordes of fangirls, because frankly, Book 3 has several instances of groups of girls swooning over Zuko and it might be what they were going for. In this case, though, theyâre swooning over him WITHOUT knowing who he is, as opposed to the fangirls in Nightmares and Daydreams. So, while it absolutely can be inspired on the many Zuko fangirls the staff knew about, this actually ends up serving to characterize a society, a culture: they donât think his scar makes him unattractive. Itâs blatantly stated that their reaction is the opposite. So, instead of thinking âoh god thatâs so unrealisticâ, how about we actually stop trying to measure everything by our standards and consider that this could be an element of WORLDBUILDING...? :â)
(Also, Iâm pretty sure thereâs a fair share of privileged young women in our current society who think Kylo Ren was hot as hell with a huge scar across his face... are those people not real, by any chance? :âD If anything, theyâre living proof that girls swooning over a scarred boy in ATLA are absolutely feasible, no matter if not everyone shares their opinion)
Continues under the cut becasue this got long....
Now then, Azula is shown to take the Kuai ball game too far. She outright causes the ball, in the final kick, to burst into flames and burns the net. Going by Chan and Ruon Jian, these kids are privileged idiots, why lie... but are these privileged idiots stupid enough to see a girl flying three feet into the air, kicking a firebent ball and then giving a foreboding speech, and say âOKAY WEâRE GONNA PICK A FIGHT WITH YOU FOR BEING SO COMPETITIVE!â???? I mean... honestly. Why would anyone do this? Azula turned an inoffensive Kuai ball game into a battlefield singlehandedly: THIS, as well, is meant to be a display of characterization. That people donât take the game so seriously, that they wouldnât pick a fight with her because sheâs dangerous or because they just donât care as much as she does... itâs characterizing Fire Nation people every bit as much as it characterizes Azula.
Azula and Zuko are both shown reacting in ridiculous ways to casual things in this episode: Azula takes the game too far, potentially stages the burning down of a house in retaliation for being rejected by a boy, Zuko is hysterical and jealous and snaps at Mai over stupid things... itâs, again, a matter of showing how poorly adjusted these characters are. Theyâre not normal kids. They DONâT behave like normal kids. Normal, privileged kids in the Fire Nation, are kids like Chan and Ruon Jian. The episode literally gives you the chance to see Fire Nation society for what it is, in a way no other episode does... and because itâs not like our societies, itâs somehow wrong?
... Also, teenagers referring to themselves as teenagers is somehow unrealistic? I mean... is it nowadays? I donât think any teenagers had a problem with saying they were teens in my youth :âDDD literally remember MCR released a song called Teenagers and a lot of us loved it to pieces. What exactly is so outrageous about it? Might be that this worked better in the mid-00â˛s, but I hardly think this makes no sense? Aang refers to himself as a kid earlier in the show, is that unrealistic too and worth rebuking a whole episode over? Are all teenagers supposed to be pretending to be grown-ups, like so many 16-year-olds on Tumblr who always talk like theyâve figured out the world and try to impose rules on fully-grown adults upon whom they have absolutely no power? :âDDDDD Yeah, I think this particular point is a stupid thing to make a fuss over. Honestly, it is.
Chan tells people not to make a mess = unrealistic. Ha. Did this person ignore his reactions at the chaos Azula, Zuko, Mai and Ty Lee caused in his house? âYOU BROKE MY NANAâS VASE!!!â, anyone? Like... Iâm sorry, but this IS characterization, yet again! This shows Chan is a spoiled brat who wants to stay in his familyâs good graces. The party isnât at all as crazy and wild as youâd expect from, again, an American teenage party... and why? Because, for one thing, Chan is clearly afraid of the consequences of too much chaos in the beach house: this implies fear of authority, of his parents, perhaps even his grandparents.Â
For another, again, FIRE NATION SOCIETY: what does this clever critic know, by any chance, of Nazi Germanyâs Hitler Youth? Iâve watched a few documentaries about it, and basically if you were a boy and you werenât in Hitler Youth, you were no one. You were worthless. And what happened in Hitler Youth? Conditioning to the extreme. These kids were taught all the alt-right ideology that Tumblr despises, and they were made to believe it was an undeniable reality. Were there cases of kids who didnât like it, kids who didnât approve of it? Surely. But the general idea of Hitler Youth was to educate every kid to behave in the way Hitler considered appropriate, to the point where âthe notion "Germany must live" even if they (members of the HJ) had to die was "hammered" into them.â
This is, of course, an extreme example and Iâm sure Fire Nation education wasnât that extreme because we saw it for ourselves, itâs not. But a slightly milder version of it? Thatâs absolutely feasible and consistent with what we see in The Headband. Therefore, kids getting high and drunk at a party? Maybe that kind of thing simply DOESNâT happen in a Fire Nation party? :â) Maybe theyâre taught that those kinds of things are off-limits to anyone under a certain age (or outright forbidden, might be the case with drugs), and as they live in a tyrannical society that priorizes the Fire Lord and his decrees above all else, where his word is treated as that of a god, even mischievous teenagers refuse to act out? :âD oh, what an implausible concept, this just canât possibly make any sense! Hitler Youth is unrealistic too!
Lastly, that a bunch of kids would sit in a circle psychoanalyzing each other seems implausible to this person is actually laughable for me. Not only have I constantly found myself, from my early teenage years to current days, serving as some sort of unofficial therapist for many of my friends, who share their woes and ask me for advice (whether theyâll heed it or not), most importantly, I once had an experience with a friend, back in high school, much like what happens with these kids in The Beach, after Iâd spent years doing a lot of post-depression introspection. I shared a lot of stuff I didnât often talk about, and beats me WHY I felt completely comfortable sharing it with my friend that day, but I did. She understood me, listened, offered her opinion, and we talked about her problems too. This happened when I was 15-16. If this person has never experienced such situation... why, thatâs not anyoneâs business. But itâs certainly not their business to determine this just DOESNâT happen, to anyone, ever. I can safely say it does, to people who do have problems and who sometimes just need a friendly shoulder to rely on. Maybe this criticâs life is just so perfect theyâve never had to share their woes with anyone else :â) Iâm afraid that doesnât invalidate those of us who are different, and it doesnât invalidate the possibility that those four could talk, as they did, without breaking characterization, in the scene of the fireplace at the beach.
Saying that a show about a group of kids who save the world and then effectively become leaders of such world, facing very little opposition in the process, is unrealistic because âteenagers arenât like that becuase I wasnât like that as a teenagerâ may be one of the most ridiculous and shortsighted things Iâve seen in this fandom, AND IâVE SEEN A LOT OF RIDICULOUS AND SHORTSIGHTED THINGS. A personâs experiences are NOT universal, regardless of how widespread their culture may be. More importantly, fiction does NOT have to abide by rules established by our current societyâs state and cultural values. ATLA, as it is, is a completely different world from our own, regardless of its inspiration in many Asian cultures.
I, personally, find it a lot more unrealistic that Fire Lord Zuko can become Fire Lord without much in the way of visible protesting or boycotting when he was a banished prince who didnât even win in his Agni Kai against Azula since itâs Katara who ends up defeating her and, as far as the rules go, Azula technically won even if not in the most dignified of ways. I find it even more unrealistic that LOK tells us Zuko was Fire Lord successfully for 70+ years and the Fire Nation has been fully reformed into a non-warmongering country despite the 100+ years of indoctrination started by Sozinâs rule. That this gets swept under a rug, not only in the neatly wrapped finale that leaves a thousand unanswered questions, but in the sequel show that merely confirms Zuko succeeded and shows NOTHING of how he managed to reform such a fucked up society...? That is a thousand times more important to me than âprivileged kids arenât acting like privileged kids OMG!â. Honestly, you want privileged kids abusing all their privileges in our society? Go watch Gossip Girl, I genuinely recommend it. You want something that proposes a completely different possibility and a glance at what a society guided by a tyrannical dictator looks like? Feel free to watch The Beach again with a completely different focus and MAYBE youâll understand what the writers were going for.
If this person happens to see my answer, I hope they learn that worldbuilding, for a storyteller, entails CREATING a world that isnât necessarily like the one weâre familiar with. There are multiple layers to such a world, and society and culture are some of them. Not all cultures and societies work the same way, which is part of why sometimes youâll find behaviors from people who belong to wholly different cultures and wind up perplexed because whatever theyâre doing is completely unfamiliar for you. Are there any universal behaviors in humans? Maybe! But in a work of FICTION, even the most universal of behaviors can be changed, deleted, altered however the writer sees fit! :âD itâs not a novel concept, and as far as logical fallacies are concerned, this show features a whole slew of those that have nothing to do with this peculiar sense of ârealismâ, fallacies that absolutely can and should be called out. Namely, things that contradict the internal logic of the show, rather than things that are incompatible with OUR world. Portraying a world thatâs very different from ours, on virtually every level you can think of? Thatâs called creativity, not lack of realism. Please learn the difference.