One Nice Bug Per Day
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
h
dirt enthusiast
Jules of Nature
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Janaina Medeiros
NASA
⁂
Discoholic 🪩
oozey mess
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
🪼
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
shark vs the universe
RMH
d e v o n
@theartofmadeline
Andulka
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Nepal
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada
seen from Japan
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@syscoursefrog
This is my syscourse blog.
I am an adult who lives with DID.
i am syscourse unaligned. i am NOT pro, neu, or anti endo. my opinions are complicated and ever evolving.
I interact with every side of syscourse, and greatly value the opinions of those who disagree with me.
i don't even know what I'm doing anymore.
no DNI.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Or you could just stop being ableist and larping DID. Creating OCs and making them into your imaginary friends is free btw and harms nobody. But instead, you choose ableism.
i love how CDDs weren't even mentioned in the original post. you just had to invent something to be pissed about.
Your entire account is dedicated to spreading ableism towards systems, stfu
lmao k
Or you could just stop being ableist and larping DID. Creating OCs and making them into your imaginary friends is free btw and harms nobody. But instead, you choose ableism.
i love how CDDs weren't even mentioned in the original post. you just had to invent something to be pissed about.
I feel like some of you don't see people who ID as endogenic as actual human beings with thoughts and feelings and an equal right to love and happiness, and it makes me physically ill and scared to be around you. If something as small as an identity label makes you think and act this way, you are not safe to be around. Not when your respect and love for other human beings is conditional.
as a CDD system who does NOT identify as plural, it pisses me off to no end when anti-endos insist that CDDs are the only way someone can be plural.
Not only is that just factually incorrect (plurality has always included nondisordered endogenic systems), it also boils CDDs down to "alter disorder" and invalidates many many pwCDDs who don't consider themselves plural.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
CDDs do not own the word "system". there are many definitions and hundreds of use cases for the word.
Just like the respiratory system is not the same as the political system, nondisordered endogenic systems are not the same as traumagenic CDD systems. but they are all still systems.
been seeing an endo talking point frequently and i just wanna know.
where the fuck did they get "traumagenic systems can be nondisordered and nontraumagenic systems can be disordered" from?
how are you a system but not disordered and how is your system not caused by a disorder but somehow your "plurality is disordered"
i don't fucking like any of you
traumagenic nondisordered system = "my system stems from trauma but we work together well/have good communication/have no amnesia/our plurality otherwise doesn't disrupt our functioning or quality of life"
disordered endogenic system= "my system does not stem from trauma (maybe I was born plural) but we have amnesia/poor communication/high conflict/etc (perhaps caused by trauma later on) that disrupts our functioning and negatively impacts our quality of life".
it's really not that hard
I'm anti endo myself, but alot of anti endos need to remember that a traumagenic system being pro endo doesn't somehow make that system fake or endogenic. They're still traumagenic and fakeclaiming them isn't ok.
(Endos DNI)
- 💜
— “endogenic plurality is under-researched”
“under-researched,” you say? no. it is simply unresearched.
why would scholars squander their time and resources upon a phenomenon the alleged existence of which extends no farther than the confines of social media? delusion does not become legitimacy merely because enough fools repeat it in unison.
not researched, you say?
i would beg to differ
I think that expecting every blog to have a syscourse stance has gotten out of hand. How realistic truely is it for a DID/OSDD/P-DID system who may not have even acheived functional multiplicity yet to have a consistent unified stance on any issue, let alone on this issue?
anti endo posts generally present this is an issue of abilisim, but expecting consistent unified behaviour and stances on anything from a system, especially new systems who might not even have communication with each other, let alone anything close to functional multiplicity is itself abilist
The closest thing to a unified collective stance you'll get out of us is that we are collectively a grumpy old woman with DID who views sources like pluralpedia as a bunch of teenagers spouting nonsense. We consider ourselves a pwDID and do not consider ourselves plural.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
WHY DO ANTI ENDOS FORGET THAT SO MUCH OF THE PRO ENDO COMMUNITY ARE DISORDERED AND TRAUMAGENIC
"Youre harassing a deeply traumatized community" SO ARE YOU. SO. THE FUCK. ARE YOU.
MOST PRO ENDOS I KNOW ARE FULLY TRAUMAGENIC. NOT ALL PRO ENDOS ARE ENDOS THEMSELVES AS MUCH AS YOU'D LIKE TO BELIEVE ONLY ANTI ENDOS HAVE "REAL DID" OR "REAL TRAUMA"
could just be a me problem but why do --> some <-- pro endos/ntgs insist on only tagging their posts as "plural" and no actual tags regarding their stance on endos
I'll say it again and I've said it before, it is so irritating to scroll through hundreds of posts just to find out if a user supports ableism or not
(Like I understand people not wanting to interact with "syscourse" and all, but that shouldn't even be considered syscourse in the first place)
hot take I guess but no one owes you their opinion on endos. it affects you in no way shape or form.
Something I've noticed with lots of anti-endos online is that more often than not, in their attempts to prove and/or deny the existence of endogenic systems, end up dumbing down CDDs to being alter disorders rather than the dissociative disorders they actually are.
It gets to be concerning since it comes off as incredibly ableist.
My interpretation of the Florality thing.
"Only CDDs can cause systems."
"Ok well I'm not a system, I'm multiple people in the same brain."
"That's a system. Either you have a CDD or you're faking or delusional. And also CDDs aren't multiple people. They're multiple dissociative states."
"Well I'm not dissociative states, I'm people. You can't have it both ways."
"Nuhuh cuz I said so. I'll only believe you if you have proof."
*gives forty pages of resources*
"Those don't count cuz I said so."
Siiiigh. This kind of thinking is so annoying. If you want to be on the side of science, it would help if you could A) be logical minded and B) understand that people use words differently so getting on the same page with definitions is super useful and C) really understand how science works. You don't need brain scans to prove stuff. We knew CDDs were a thing before brain scans existed. We used the same processes to validate CDDs before brain scans were possible, as are currently used to validate endogenics. Brain scans aren't proof. They show how something affects the brain, not if it exists.
the only argument that I still see anti-endos use that makes more or less sense to me is the use of the term "system" in non-cdd systems. Like, it's one of the only arguments that has validity to them. "If you don't have a CDD you aren't a system", it's one of the only arguments they seem to parrot over and over.
So, why don't to people who are non-cdd systems use another word? what's the reasoning, genuinely? Because I see that's the main problem that CDD/ant endo systems have with the non-traumagenic plurality community as a whole. I know the word "system" is not only for CDDs (it comes from IFS therapy, I know), but it would reduce the conflict from anti-endos, right? /genq (all of this /gen)
i don't think it's fair to ask a whole demographic (endos) to change the language and labels they use just to appease those that hate them.
with more specific, medical terminology (alter, polyfragmented, etc) it's reasonable; but when the word "system" has a bunch of different meanings and use cases, some of which the concept of endogenic plurality fits under by definition, it's ridiculous.
also, at least in my experience, that wouldn't even be enough for a lot of anti-endos. i mean, look at how many of them are anti-polymind; polyminds don't use system terminology at all, and plenty of anti-endos STILL say they're mocking pwCDDs.
it's clear that the language, a lot of the time, isn't even the problem. the problem is anti-endos thinking that the experience of being many is unique to CDDs, and to say otherwise is offensive or mocking in some way.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
amazing how alienating the CDD tags are if you don't viscerally hate endos. you go there to find someone to relate to and connect through shared difficulties and they're like "if you talk to me about the disorder we both have you're harassing me because you don't think endos should kill themselves" idk how to tell you that you should care for other people
99% of people doing syscourse hate anti-endos/pro-endos/whatever side they’re against more than they love systems and I think that’s one of the reasons why it’ll never go anywhere.
