Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer (May 21, 1960 – November 28, 1994), also known as the Milwaukee Cannibal or the Milwaukee Monster, was an American serial killer and sex offender who killed and dismembered seventeen men and boys between 1978 and 1991. Many of his later murders involved necrophilia,cannibalism and the permanent preservation of body parts—typically all or part of the skeleton. (source: Wikipedia)

Jeffrey Dahmer was both air and earth dominant—a man rooted in logic, yet suspended in the isolation of his own mind. He carried a cold, stoic demeanor, often detached and unable to fully access or express his emotions. Locked away within himself, he lived a life of mental seclusion, where intellect and disconnection reigned.

Dahmer was a serial killer who claimed the lives of numerous men during a time when such horrors were disturbingly frequent. On the surface, he didn’t appear to be a killer—his face gave nothing away. But behind his composed exterior lay a mind plagued by bloodthirsty, necrophilic urges and a hunger for control that festered in silence. His atrocities weren’t worn on his sleeve; they were buried deep in the caverns of his psyche.

His elemental dominance is striking: earth and air—two incompatible forces. Both are logical, yet they operate differently. Air is unorthodox, erratic, and cerebral, while earth is grounded, rigid, and governed by what can be proven and seen. In Dahmer, this created an internal dissonance. One part of him remained anchored in cold rationality, while the other drifted into abstract fantasies. Emotionally, he seemed lost—unable to grasp the depth of his own feelings, yet tormented by them. He struggled with human connection, teetering between profound isolation and a desperate yearning for intimacy.

This internal contradiction eventually combusted, culminating in a series of gruesome murders that led to his arrest, imprisonment, and eventual death behind bars.

Let us now begin to dive into the natal chart of Jeffrey Dahmer—to peel back the layers and explore the astrological roots of his psychological collapse. In doing so, we seek to understand not just the man, but the complex intersection of shadow and psyche through the lens of the stars.

HOUSE 1: THE SOFT AURA

Jeffrey Dahmer’s first house is in Libra. He came across as charming—someone who could seem friendly, even magnetic. There was an airiness to his presence, a subtle way he would scan a room as he entered, maintaining a detached but seemingly benign demeanor. A man of few words, he made those words appear meaningful—carefully chosen, never disruptive, never abrasive. He carried himself with composure, as though he didn’t want to disturb the energy of the space around him.

That was the surface.

But Neptune in the first house added another layer to his persona—one of fog, illusion, and mystery. His detachment wasn’t just politeness—it veiled a deeper absence, a kind of vacancy in his gaze, as though he wasn’t fully there. He drifted inward, often lost in fantasy or mental abstraction. This added a softness to his energy, a disarming sensitivity that made him appear docile, even harmless.

There was something ethereal about him—something otherworldly. With Libra rising, his charm was heightened. He exuded a quiet allure, a mystique that drew people in. His presence seemed gentle, artistic, and inoffensive. But this very quality became the mask—the deception. His perceived gentleness concealed a deep corruption, and it was this blend of charm, illusion, and shadow that made his presence both captivating and dangerous.

HOUSE 2: INTENSELY POSSESSIVE

His second house was in Scorpio, indicating a deeply possessive nature. In the House of Possession and Security, this placement suggests he needed total control and dominance over anything he became attached to. However, with no planets placed in the second house, this influence remained more of an undercurrent—subtle, rather than a central force in his chart.

HOUSE 3: MEANINGFUL CONVERSATIONS

His third house was ruled by Sagittarius. He likely enjoyed conversation and was intellectually curious—someone who sought meaning through words and exploration. There was a hunger in him to understand, to communicate, and to experience life through social interaction and mental engagement. However, the lack of planetary placements in the third house suggests that while the desire was present, the development of his communication skills and social connections may have been undernourished or inconsistent. His longing for meaning through friendships and conversation may not have materialized, pointing to early struggles in forming authentic social bonds.

HOUSE 4: THE NEGLECTED HOME

With Capricorn ruling his fourth house, Dahmer’s childhood may have been marked by emotional coldness, early maturity, and a sense of isolation. Capricorn here often denotes a home environment where emotional warmth was lacking—where duty, structure, or ambition outweighed nurturance. The absence of any significant planetary influence in the fourth house suggests that while his home life may not have been a prominent shaping force, it still bore the imprints of distance and detachment.

Moreover, the fourth house represents the maternal figure, and its lack of planetary emphasis could indicate an emotional disconnection or absence in that relationship. Looking elsewhere, his Sun in Gemini points to a father figure who may have been intellectual or socially active—perhaps someone known in his community. Yet, with Gemini’s signature inconsistency, this influence may have been marked by emotional detachment and erratic expressions of affection. The combination of a cold, distant home and inconsistency in both parental roles may not have been overtly traumatic—but subtly destructive, contributing to his emotional fragmentation.

HOUSE 5: COLD LOVER

His fifth house was ruled by Aquarius, pointing to unconventional romantic interests and an atypical approach to pleasure. Detached, cerebral, and possibly emotionally disconnected, he likely intellectualized romance rather than emotionally engaging with it. Pleasure may have lived more in his mind than in lived experience.

With no planets in the fifth house, this energy was more like a dormant thread—an influence, not a dominant force. A subdued fifth house can suggest a person who didn’t actively pursue romantic relationships, or who viewed love and sex through an abstract or fantastical lens. In Dahmer’s case, it’s possible that romantic connection remained detached, unexpressed, or distorted—more of an internalized fantasy than a lived reality.

HOUSE 6: FOGGY DAYS

Jeffrey Dahmer’s sixth house was in Pisces, a placement that often leads to negligence in daily responsibilities. Imagination, fantasy, and fluidity tend to overtake structure and order. With Pisces here, routine becomes inconsistent—no two days are the same. Structure dissolves into dreamy haze. However, with no planetary placements in this house, this was a subtle undercurrent in his chart, not a prominent or defining theme.

HOUSE 7: SEEKING THRILL THROUGH CONNECTION

His seventh house was in Aries, and this energy was unmistakably present in his chart. Aries on the seventh house cusp points to someone who seeks passionate, intense, and aggressive romantic connections. He was drawn to lovers who were bold, independent, and fiery—those who stirred a primal sense of excitement within him. Passion lit him up; freedom seduced him.

With his Moon in Aries placed in the seventh house, his emotional world was intricately tied to his relationships. The Moon here suggests that his emotional needs were volatile and reactive—quick to spark, quick to shift. The Moon in Aries often symbolizes a dominant or emotionally aggressive mother figure, and it’s possible he unconsciously tried to replicate the dynamic between his parents within his romantic connections.

The Aries Moon added volatility to his emotional world—passionate, impatient, and impulsive. The Moon, already a fluctuating, ever-changing force, gains even more instability in Aries. This often results in relationships that start fast, burn hot, and collapse quickly. With Mars ruling Aries, and Mars being the god of war, it’s no surprise that his romantic life was entangled with conflict, aggression, and emotional combustion. His relationships became the battlefield where his inner chaos spilled outward.

HOUSE 8: INTENSELY ATTACHED

His eighth house was ruled by Taurus. If we know anything about Taurus, it’s that it’s slow, steady, and deeply fixated. Taurus in the eighth house meant that his engagement with taboo, death, darkness, and intimacy didn’t happen suddenly—it unfolded gradually, like a hunger that grew over time. He didn’t dive headfirst into darkness; he crept into it, savoring it, and once submerged, he wouldn’t let go.

Being a fixed earth sign, Taurus brought an obsessive persistence to his eighth house themes. What began as curiosity calcified into compulsion. His darkness became routine. With Venus in Taurus in the eighth house, his attachments became dangerously deep and consuming.

Venus here shows he wasn’t just romantic—he was possessive. His love wasn’t soft; it was devouring. The eighth house already deals with intensity, death, and the merging of souls. Put Venus in Taurus here, and you have someone whose love becomes fixation—something he clings to with primal resistance, even as it rots. Letting go was nearly impossible for him. What he loved, he consumed. Literally and metaphorically.

HOUSE 9: JACK OF ALL IDEOLOGIES

His ninth house was ruled by Gemini, suggesting a philosophical curiosity and a restless mind that skimmed various belief systems without fully diving into any one ideology. He was an experimenter—dabbling, questioning, shifting perspectives—but not settling. Yet, with no planets placed in his ninth house, this energy remained faint—a background tendency rather than a strong influence. His quest for meaning lacked anchoring.

HOUSE 10: THE HOMEBODY

His tenth house was in Cancer, a placement that would typically suggest a public image of gentleness, sensitivity, or nurturing presence. It’s the image of someone seen as soft or unthreatening. However, with no planets in the tenth house, this Cancerian influence wasn’t dominant in his chart. His public persona may have appeared innocent, but it wasn’t a core part of his astrological identity.

HOUSE 11: BOYS JUST WANNA HAVE FUN

In his eleventh house, Leo reigned. This placement points to a deep desire for friendship, connection, and recognition. He longed for belonging, for attention, and perhaps even fame. Leo here suggests he craved community and took pride in being seen or acknowledged.

But again, with no planetary placements in the eleventh house, these desires went unmet. The yearning was there, but it was isolated—left to echo in the background of his psyche. The need for friendship, admiration, and social integration never fully found expression. The emptiness of this house may have contributed to his profound loneliness and isolation.

HOUSE 12: UNCONSCIOUS DETAIL

His twelfth house was ruled by Virgo, placing the energies of precision, order, and practical problem-solving in the realm of the unconscious. These qualities were hidden, repressed, or inaccessible to him. He likely had a blind spot when it came to structure, discernment, and purity. With no planets in this house, these Virgoan gifts remained dormant, lost within the fog of his subconscious. They were traits he didn’t easily access—elements of himself he neither understood nor integrated.

Why Did Jeffrey Dahmer Kill?

From my perspective, I truly believe that Jeffrey Dahmer didn’t fully understand his own nature. With Neptune in the first house, it’s easy to get lost in Neptune’s fog—especially around identity. In the formative years, when the sense of self is still forming, this placement can create deep confusion about who one truly is. That fog, cast over his identity, led to major blind spots—especially regarding his motivations, urges, and why he acted the way he did.

When we look at his victims—most of whom he was romantically or sexually inclined toward—we see that Libra in the first house made Venus his chart ruler, placing love and attraction at the forefront of his life’s expression. But his Venus was in Taurus, in the eighth house. That’s significant. Taurus is intensely possessive. It clings, it holds, it needs to have and to contain. For Taurus, stability comes from ownership—knowing something is theirs.

Now, place that Venus in the eighth house, the realm of death, taboos, obsession, and transformation, and you begin to see how his desire for love, affection, and even connection became darkened, distorted, and devouring. His concept of love was intertwined with consumption—he wanted to own the object of his desire, even if that meant destroying it.

This was exacerbated by his Moon in Aries in the seventh house. Emotionally, he was drawn to aggressive, bold partners—people with fiery, assertive energy. Aries is about conquest. He wanted someone he could conquer, someone he could dominate. Once that conquest was felt—once he felt he had emotionally subdued them—his Venus in Taurus in the eighth house stepped in with its urge to consume, possess, and never let go.

And with Neptune still in the first house, the entire process remained clouded. His desires, urges, and attachments were steeped in delusion and fantasy. That fog blurred the line between love and domination, attraction and destruction. He likely didn’t even understand what was driving him. He became lost inside the spell of his own compulsions.

I genuinely believe Dahmer got carried away with his own darkness. And he enacted that darkness through his attempts to form relationships—not necessarily ones that were mutual or healthy, but ones he could control. It wasn’t always about being in a romantic relationship in the traditional sense, but rather, about the idea of romantic ownership. His desire to connect, fueled by distorted love and obsession, took a monstrous turn.

Killing, for him, became a method of possession—a way to solidify control. It allowed him to act on his Moon in Aries (emotional aggression), his Venus in Taurus in the eighth house (possessive, obsessive love), and his foggy Neptune in the first (distorted self-image and motivation). Death, in his psyche, may have been the sacrifice required to claim what he believed belonged to him.

Notable Points in Jeffrey Dahmer’s Natal Chart

• He had an 8th house stellium, which I believe is incredibly significant. His chart was steeped in darkness. He operated within the terrain of the 8th house—death, control, obsession—and remained there for much of what he did. Not only did he have 8th house placements, but he also had 7th house placements. This created a fusion of connection and darkness—connection that became distorted.

Most notably, he had Sun in Gemini in the 8th house, Mercury in Gemini in the 8th, and Venus in Taurus in the 8th. The Sun and Mercury in Gemini intellectualized the darkness for him. They gave him the ability to rationalize his desires, to dance in and out of obsession without full integration. This inconsistency made him a weaver—threading light and shadow, unable to truly discern the boundary.

But it was Venus in Taurus in the 8th house that I believe truly turned desire into danger. Venus in Taurus is fixed—it clings, it attaches, it refuses to let go. When that love becomes entangled with 8th house themes, it turns love into possession, into consumption. His affections were not soft; they were ravenous. His Moon in Aries in the 7th already carried rage, volatility, and a drive to conquer emotionally. But the 8th house stellium sunk his teeth in deeper. While it offered potential for transformation, it also opened the door to a darkness he never learned to master.

The Neptune fog in the 1st house added confusion around boundaries—both with others and with himself. He didn’t know where he ended and others began. That, combined with the possessive Venus in the 8th and a volatile Aries Moon, created a combustible internal storm.

• His Moon and Mars were both in Aries, so his emotional world and primal instincts were both inflamed. He felt with fire. He reacted with aggression. His desires were raw, impulsive, and consuming. Yet with Libra rising and Neptune in the 1st house, this fire was veiled—he appeared soft, charming, and harmless. It was a disguise even he may have believed.

His Mars in the 6th house made his compulsions part of his daily life—routine, instinctual, embedded into the rhythm of his every day. Violence became habitual.

• His Jupiter and Saturn were both in Capricorn in the 3rd house. This is a clear theme of growth being intertwined with karmic weight. Where he longed to expand, he also met his greatest obstacles. Saturn in the 3rd often signifies a cold, restrictive early environment. Emotional warmth may have been absent. Social isolation, learning difficulties, or rigid expectations likely marked his childhood. Capricorn makes this even heavier—he felt like an outsider, misunderstood, and burdened early in life.

• His Vertex in Taurus in the 7th house indicates that his fate was intertwined with relationships and connections—for better or for worse. Once his mind became consumed by darkness and possession, that fate bled into those he connected with. The people he was “destined” to meet became the canvas for his inner chaos.

• Sun conjunct Mercury in the 8th house meant his identity and his thinking were deeply fused—and fused with darkness. The 8th house wasn’t just something he visited—it echoed through his mind, body, and bones. His thoughts were steeped in taboo, his identity marked by inner shadows.

• Sun square Pluto is where things become eerily complex. His Sun was in the 8th, so darkness shaped his very selfhood. But Pluto was in the 11th, the house of social connection, community, and ideals. This square created deep inner tension—between who he was and how he belonged. He likely felt exposed in his darkness yet simultaneously desperate to hide it. He probably chose his victims with meticulous care. This aspect also suggests ancestral trauma. His father or other men in his lineage may have wrestled with similar demons.

• Moon square Saturn, especially with the Moon in Aries, suggests a deeply strained relationship with his mother. The environment he grew up in wasn’t soft—it was cold, emotionally barren, and possibly oppressive. Saturn in the 3rd supports the idea that his parents restricted social development. This aspect reveals inherited emotional karma—his parents likely carried trauma of their own.

• Mercury square Pluto is a hallmark of someone mentally wrestling with darkness. In his case, exacerbated by the 8th house stellium, it created a mind that couldn’t escape the gravitational pull of the underworld. His thoughts were laced with control, secrecy, and psychological torment.

• Venus square Uranus and Mars square Jupiter tell a clear story: he didn’t know how to love or form stable bonds. His desires were out of control—unpredictable, obsessive, and excessive. Mars square Jupiter doesn’t favor moderation—it inflames impulsiveness and indulgence. He was led by urges he couldn’t master.

• Ascendant opposite Moon reveals the mask he wore. With Libra rising, he came across as gentle, even graceful. But Moon in Aries boiled underneath. Few saw it coming. Paired with Ascendant square Saturn, his charm was intermittent—he could be cold and severe without realizing it, shifting between poise and emotional frost.

• Lilith square Mars and opposite Jupiter show a volatile relationship with his shadow. Lilith stirred rage, dominance, and sexual intensity. The square to Mars made him act on it; the opposition to Jupiter exaggerated it. He indulged in the darker feminine archetype—wild, forbidden, and uncontrolled.

• Chiron square Sun and Neptune in the 1st house made him a lost soul. He struggled deeply with his identity. He didn’t know who he was and felt disconnected from his inner truth. Chiron square Mercury added mental insecurity—he doubted how he thought, how he spoke, how he existed. These wounds only intensified his need for control.

THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS