happy pride to the gay people in my computer <3
One Nice Bug Per Day
Cosmic Funnies
AnasAbdin
todays bird

if i look back, i am lost
tumblr dot com
h
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

titsay
Sweet Seals For You, Always

JBB: An Artblog!

shark vs the universe
sheepfilms
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Monterey Bay Aquarium
hello vonnie

Janaina Medeiros
Misplaced Lens Cap
we're not kids anymore.
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Guatemala

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia

seen from Argentina
seen from Guatemala
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Latvia

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Spain

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from South Korea

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Ukraine
seen from Guatemala

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United Kingdom
@sunnylovesgirlythings
happy pride to the gay people in my computer <3

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Hi patience! What are you doing here? Wrong game buddy!
Itâs here !! The guide for two-legged people who donât know how to draw wheelchairs !!! 7 pages of infodump ! Disclaimer : I donât know everything, I have one (1) experience of wheelchair user who used both bad and good chairs, and I share what I learned.
Image description :
1) Calvin in his wheelchair saying âyoâ under a huge title âhow to draw manual wheelchairs properly by Calvin Arium, a wheelchair user comic artistâ.
2) A character says âmy character self propels in a chair that was outdated in 1970 lolâ Calvin says âso it looks like you two legged people donât know the difference between an hospital chair and a chair made to be independantâ an arrow point the crapppy chair, saying âwe never want to see this againâ
a bubble says âthe hospital chair is extremely unpractical, tough considering itâs cheaper than a good custom chair a lot of us have only thisâ
3) a character hurt himself trying to reach the wheels of the hospital chair. Several arrows point why the chair is unpractical : âhigh backrest restrain shoulders movementâ âhuge armrest restrains wheel accessâ âseparated footrest : amovible, cheap, bulkyâ âx structure, foldable but heavyâ âhuge front casters for stabilityâ âheavy wheelsâ
4) Several arrows point an active wheelchair (the KSL by KĂźshall) : âusually no armrestâ âa low backrest allow more movementâ âlight, design, ferning expersiveâ âspecial cushion to avoind injuriesâ âknee angle is usually 90°â âone single piece of frame, sometimes entirely weldedâ âweight : from 4 to 10kgâ âoften rigidâ âcenter of the wheel is the center of gravityâ âhigher quality wheels : less spikesâ
5) A hand grab different parts of the wheel, pushing harder in the second half. Bubbles says âsome have gloves, some donât. The hand must grab the biggest area possible. Less movement = more energy. This is a common but not only way to push.Calvin is on his back wheels, rolling on grass and dirt bubble says âpopping a wheelie is when a wheelchair user rolls on their back wheels to roll on every complicated surface.
6) several drawings illustrate the folding frame, the ergonomic but rigid and expensive backrest, the separated footrest (only for folding frame), the handles, the folding handles, athe amovibles handles, or no handles, the cool fancy loopwheels, the pretty custom colorsÂ
7) More Features ! The fancy rigid-foldable frame, the anti tippers (sometimes used by beginners), the motorization (wheels, smart drive) when propelling yourself is difficult Calvin says âand now vroom vroom motherfuckersâ
Consider also supporting me by buying me a coffee on ko-fi : ko-fi.com/calvinariumÂ
Thanks !
EDIT : Here is a youtube playlist about choosing, cleaning and using active manual wheelchairs in the public space, I learned a lot from those videos when I was a wheelie newbie. (Not sure theyâre all captionned tho) https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3j9XB2x5HYmZqgLakRCNt_fjsVZjDAkJ
Sharing
Oh my gosh my daughter Uta looks so cute in the movie/new show transformations. In love with the red upgrade for the show. So sheâs a confirmed red cure too, thatâs so cool
With how theyâre rereleasing almost all her merch in the new colours part of me wonders if the staff behind the scenes always wanted her to be a red cure but the pink got pushed by the marketing department and this was the compromise.
Like not making new merch to market it. Theyâre remaking her old merch.
Because theyâre not marketing the show form as a power up. This isnât how they market those. This is almost being marketed like a permanent upgrade. Which not sure itâll be that yet but this seems to be leaning that way!
And you want to know the last time a character got a core outfit upgrade that wasnât due to it being a sequel season?
Splash star. All the way back in 2006.
Back when cure bloom and egret became cure bright and windy.
So if this actually is a proper upgrade form? Iâm excited! That almost never happens in just one season!
I KNEW IT!!!! I FUCKING KNEW IT!
I KNEW SHE WAS ORIGINALLY SUPPOSED TO BE RED LIKE HER POWER UP!!!
VINDICATION!!!!
I CALLED IT!!!
And theyâre absolutely wrong. She looks a lot better in Red. Makes her pop more in the precure lineup.
Her arbitrary red form that ended up meaning nothing was because she was originally meant to be that colour from the start. I was right on the money.
Happy pride month!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I genuinely do not care what the masters of the universe films do with She-ra. I genuinely donât. I fully support media taking creative liberties with characters. Any characterisation of her is fine. Have fun!
But she better still be a lesbian. She doesnât even have to get with Catra specifically. But she better like girls.
They donât get to make a massive deal out of her being gay in the reboot. Marketing it around as this big step forward and then just quietly back out of it when itâs no longer convenient for them.
If there is any part of a brands pathway through the years that is to be a permanent point of no return for a character? Itâs making them canonically Lgbtqia+.
You donât get to do this.
Only to just pretend it didnât happen. Thatâs irreversible.
Reminder. These characters are lgbtqia+.
They are queer and were written with that in mind by their writers. Writers that wanted to do more. Did do more before Disney forced them to self censor.
Disney and Pixarâs decisions to hide these characters queerness away is not one to be respected. Itâs not to be accepted.
These characters are queer. And thereâs nothing Disney or Pixar can do about it.
We see them for what they are. And what they couldâve been had their shows aired in a better time and world.
And we long and fight for a world where they can be retold completely as intended. As who they were always supposed to be.
also titus too. they really should not have made titus a cisgender male. we already have too many like syndrome, ernesto de la cruz, you name it. honestly titus (and in a realistic sense king george too) should have been female like the ant queen as beaver and ant colonies are matriarchal and butterflies are female coded even more so than both, but at least king george had a patriarchy to back him up therefore him being male is justified and brings more variety especially since this is a fictional work and beavers and ants arent really feminine symbols. for titus however this isnt justified.
he is literally sandwiched between two females: his mother and the ant queen and it just makes no sense why him, out of them three, is male. especially for his other reasons. he literally was gonna be insect queen too and was happy to be one when his mother died. this makes it just so confusing as to why they made him male. especially when disguising as jerry, he literally struggled with masculinity hard like a woman disguising as a male. plus his butterfly didnt get screentime making it sound as if dave franco only voiced the jerry robot especially when they make scenes when francos voice glitches as his robot gets destroyed, something that wouldnt have happened if this were his actual voice making it seem like francos voice as butterfly was small enough it was only out of convenience thanks to the lack of screentime and making it sound like eman abdul-razzak voiced him in the entire movie. abdul-razzak as titus sounded like a teenage girl rather than a child of either gender throughout. on top of that in that stage he really had a bratty personality like a teenage girl. not to forget where he was the LEGITIMATE heir to his mother and still the council was hesitant to hail him.
all combined shows where he stands. pixar has always casted actual boys as boys, even when their first movie was ever released that featured a boy at a time where women voicing boys was standard and always stood by this for a very long time and even did so internationally for almost every dub not just domestically, it was only until titus that these things started to happen which shows they knew what mess they made: half of the dubbing agencies cast girls or women and the rest boys??
we already have a shortage of female pixar villains and somehow he has everything but his titles and official documents to back him up?? should have made him a female villain. it only would make sense cus he literally was so feminine in terms of attitude and appearance as a teenager, wanted to be insect queen, but got tired of one gender expression so he tried to explore another form of gender?? especially when he tried to impersonate a male mayor, he literally struggled with disguising as a male. even when he was not redeemable he still had his struggles and ups and downs. he shouldve just been a female who is questioning her identity and exploring her true self. like her struggles when impersonating the male mayor already implies this and the way people hesitantly hailed her as king implies this and the movie canon never called her a prince only credits and promos did and they only called her king AFTER she declared herself king??? we have mulan why cant we have titus too.
I agree but this post was about developmental queer erasure. Queerness that was fully intended and meant to be present in the story that they either were forced to remove by a request from higher ups (kai, Priya and Brooklyn) or preemptively removed themselves due to expecting pushback (Elio)
And Hoppers is an interesting case when discussing this because it actually does have potential developmental queer erasure in it. Though we donât know for sure.
But itâs not Titus.
Itâs the Reptile Queens.
I cannot find the piece of concept art right now for the life of me but there was one that referred to them as girlfriends. âshe + her snake girlfriendsâ specifically. Could be romantic, could be not.
Which they are not in the final film. I believe theyâre sisters in the final film? Theyâre kinda left ambiguous.
Which is an issue. Because theyâre routinely portrayed in marketing imagery all knotted together into a ball like that.
If you know even a little bit about snakes you know why itâs kinda inappropriate to portray anything but a snake couple like that.
Snakes do that when theyâre mating.
Itâs called a mating ball. Snakes coiling, curling and knotting together is an explicitly romantic imagery. Itâs just actual nature.
So if they really were changed from a poly couple to a set of sisters they accidentally did a sailor moon Dub and chose incest over queerness by not tweaking that part of their visual design.
And if it was up to me? Iâd just have them be a couple. Itâs less weird.
And itâs a lesson to all other character designers. Learn why an animal does a behaviour before you use it as a design quirk. Lest you get snake incest.
They did and they didnât. What they did to Riley was kind of a different queerphobic issue. And it centers around Rileyâs admiration of an older girl in her School called Val.
Now Riley and Val were never going to be a couple. They shouldnât considering thereâs quite a noticeable age gap between them. Val being 17 while Riley is 13. The best anyone couldâve ever read between them was a one sided crush coming from Riley.
And thatâs what Disney was freaking out about behind the scenes.
They were terrified and horrified at even just the potential that people could think Riley had a crush on Val. So they constantly giving notes to the animators to tone down Rileyâs reactions around Val as to try to make them feel less romantically inclined.
They were trying to Gayproof Riley. To make sure there was absolutely zero way she could be potentially read as bi. Like that was the worst thing that could happen to her.
And obviously as we all know literally from the reaction to the first trailer drop? They failed. Super failed. People immediately clocked that it felt like Riley had a crush on Val.
Because when you try that hard to make something not seem queer? It near universally makes the even unintentional queer undertones all the more obvious.
Because thereâs a queer reading someone could make to literally anything. And those readings are completely normal just like any other.
They were so terrified of a bi reading in fact that they still didnât clock that thereâs an even easier queer reading for Riley.
Which is the fact Riley is the only person in the story whose emotions are different genders.
With every other character in the story to a universal degree their emotions line up with their gender identity. Even other children.
So Riley? Could pretty easily read as genderfluid couldnât she?
Theyâre so terrified of queerness in their stories but they overlook the much more explicitly queer imagery of them.
More pony OC commissions! Starring: Rosaria Celeste (both regular and chaosified versions), Midnight Oddity, and Beetle the Clown
there is a lot of praise that can and should be given to Witch Hat Atelier's artwork, but something that should not go underappreciated is how FUCKING good Shimahama is at physical gesture. look how well they READ!!!! look how much you understand the scene just from POSE and POSTURE!!!!!!!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Aro
It's June, motherfuckers, and you know what that means! Apart from firing a few rent-lowering shots to filter out the chuds from my following, it's probably also a good time to post a reminder that there are many strange ways to be queer, and this is one of them.
video transcript below the cut, may be slightly inaccurate, I tend to ad-lib when reading my scripts into voiceover
Reminder. These characters are lgbtqia+.
They are queer and were written with that in mind by their writers. Writers that wanted to do more. Did do more before Disney forced them to self censor.
Disney and Pixarâs decisions to hide these characters queerness away is not one to be respected. Itâs not to be accepted.
These characters are queer. And thereâs nothing Disney or Pixar can do about it.
We see them for what they are. And what they couldâve been had their shows aired in a better time and world.
And we long and fight for a world where they can be retold completely as intended. As who they were always supposed to be.
also titus too. they really should not have made titus a cisgender male. we already have too many like syndrome, ernesto de la cruz, you name it. honestly titus (and in a realistic sense king george too) should have been female like the ant queen as beaver and ant colonies are matriarchal and butterflies are female coded even more so than both, but at least king george had a patriarchy to back him up therefore him being male is justified and brings more variety especially since this is a fictional work and beavers and ants arent really feminine symbols. for titus however this isnt justified.
he is literally sandwiched between two females: his mother and the ant queen and it just makes no sense why him, out of them three, is male. especially for his other reasons. he literally was gonna be insect queen too and was happy to be one when his mother died. this makes it just so confusing as to why they made him male. especially when disguising as jerry, he literally struggled with masculinity hard like a woman disguising as a male. plus his butterfly didnt get screentime making it sound as if dave franco only voiced the jerry robot especially when they make scenes when francos voice glitches as his robot gets destroyed, something that wouldnt have happened if this were his actual voice making it seem like francos voice as butterfly was small enough it was only out of convenience thanks to the lack of screentime and making it sound like eman abdul-razzak voiced him in the entire movie. abdul-razzak as titus sounded like a teenage girl rather than a child of either gender throughout. on top of that in that stage he really had a bratty personality like a teenage girl. not to forget where he was the LEGITIMATE heir to his mother and still the council was hesitant to hail him.
all combined shows where he stands. pixar has always casted actual boys as boys, even when their first movie was ever released that featured a boy at a time where women voicing boys was standard and always stood by this for a very long time and even did so internationally for almost every dub not just domestically, it was only until titus that these things started to happen which shows they knew what mess they made: half of the dubbing agencies cast girls or women and the rest boys??
we already have a shortage of female pixar villains and somehow he has everything but his titles and official documents to back him up?? should have made him a female villain. it only would make sense cus he literally was so feminine in terms of attitude and appearance as a teenager, wanted to be insect queen, but got tired of one gender expression so he tried to explore another form of gender?? especially when he tried to impersonate a male mayor, he literally struggled with disguising as a male. even when he was not redeemable he still had his struggles and ups and downs. he shouldve just been a female who is questioning her identity and exploring her true self. like her struggles when impersonating the male mayor already implies this and the way people hesitantly hailed her as king implies this and the movie canon never called her a prince only credits and promos did and they only called her king AFTER she declared herself king??? we have mulan why cant we have titus too.
I agree but this post was about developmental queer erasure. Queerness that was fully intended and meant to be present in the story that they either were forced to remove by a request from higher ups (kai, Priya and Brooklyn) or preemptively removed themselves due to expecting pushback (Elio)
And Hoppers is an interesting case when discussing this because it actually does have potential developmental queer erasure in it. Though we donât know for sure.
But itâs not Titus.
Itâs the Reptile Queens.
I cannot find the piece of concept art right now for the life of me but there was one that referred to them as girlfriends. âshe + her snake girlfriendsâ specifically. Could be romantic, could be not.
Which they are not in the final film. I believe theyâre sisters in the final film? Theyâre kinda left ambiguous.
Which is an issue. Because theyâre routinely portrayed in marketing imagery all knotted together into a ball like that.
If you know even a little bit about snakes you know why itâs kinda inappropriate to portray anything but a snake couple like that.
Snakes do that when theyâre mating.
Itâs called a mating ball. Snakes coiling, curling and knotting together is an explicitly romantic imagery. Itâs just actual nature.
So if they really were changed from a poly couple to a set of sisters they accidentally did a sailor moon Dub and chose incest over queerness by not tweaking that part of their visual design.
And if it was up to me? Iâd just have them be a couple. Itâs less weird.
And itâs a lesson to all other character designers. Learn why an animal does a behaviour before you use it as a design quirk. Lest you get snake incest.
boop boop be doopđ
Absolutely heart wrenching Backrooms idea.
Someone getting lost in there with their dog.
Not only having to navigate themselves through a non-Euclidean nightmare world but also navigate an animal through it as well. Who would probably understand it even less.
We know animals can end up there too thanks to the seagull.
Extra angst points if they get separated at one point and we have to see the dog trying to find its owner from its own perspective.
stuff is happening

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I really love that the backrooms film answers probably something that everyone has at least wondered once.
âWhat happens if I just⌠choose to stay.â
It kills you. It will eventually kill you. Because youâre choosing to live in a memory. An echo of the past.
To live in the past is to no longer experience the future.
To no longer experience the future is to run out of the present.
To run out of the present allows the past to catch up to you. Quickly.
Clark was dead the second he made that choice. Not just because of the captain. But because in that very moment he let go of his future.
And became someone who only exists in the past.
A once-in-a-lifetime shot â the moon perfectly framed by a rainbow. Caught at just the right time. đ đ
Sourcing the photos as taken by Mark Ham on Instagram, according to one of the replies.
Happy Pride month to the moon