Why do you think nobody ever discusses the most problematic aspects of the first book?
There is obviously the complete disregard for Al’s mental health and problems leading up to suicide, which was then painted to be some sort of cowardice by our lovely protagonist, who them make it all about herself and then shares a moment with Four.
Everybody seems to have complete amnesia about the fact that Tris was sexually assaulted on TWO OCCASIONS. For every single one of them she not only doesn’t report it, but implies that there is weakness in reporting. Emphasis: weakness not shame. Many women as we know are afraid to speak up for the fear of embarrassment, and when they do it is nothing short of brave. But the brave heroine here believes that there is true courage in not telling and almost makes it look like if you did, you’d be a tattletale. It’s sickening. She made it look like she would be called weak. Which is scarily probably true in that world.
Moreover, the most terrible offense on Roth’s part was what she did with Peter after that. Over the series, he is used as comic relief and even given some sort of redemption, to the point where he now has fans in a largely female preteen audience who seem to forget his predatory actions. They even ship him with Tris. Which is vomit worthy.
Also, how come Al, the formerly good guy, with obvious issues, that none of his friends helped, committed suicide and it was never spoken of again. How come Tris doesn’t feel any regret, not for not forgiving him, but for not being a better friend? But most importantly how come he gets such bad rep in the fandom when Peter is sanctioned by Roth to be a more redeemable character, which is wrong on so many levels.
It is irresponsible of Veronica to have written this this way, but also for never talking about it. Your blog is divergent discourse so I think we should start talking about this more in the fandom.